Prognostic value of quantitative multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging parameters and histopathologic features for disease-free survival in locally advanced non-mucinous rectal adenocarcinoma
IF 2.3 3区 医学Q2 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Zhiyu Chen, Xiaofei Wu, Yuxi Ge, Jianmin Xu, Zhijian Su, Bo Liu, Yuanyuan Gao, Zi Wang, Binghua Xu
{"title":"Prognostic value of quantitative multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging parameters and histopathologic features for disease-free survival in locally advanced non-mucinous rectal adenocarcinoma","authors":"Zhiyu Chen, Xiaofei Wu, Yuxi Ge, Jianmin Xu, Zhijian Su, Bo Liu, Yuanyuan Gao, Zi Wang, Binghua Xu","doi":"10.1007/s00261-026-05480-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>To develop a postoperative risk stratification model integrating baseline T2 mapping and histopathologic factors for predicting disease-free survival (DFS) in patients with locally advanced non-mucinous rectal adenocarcinoma after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (NCRT) and surgery.</p><h3>Methods</h3><p>This retrospective study included 116 patients with non-mucinous rectal adenocarcinoma who underwent NCRT followed by surgery. Baseline T2 values and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values were measured. Prognostic factors for DFS were assessed using Cox proportional hazards regression. Given the limited number of DFS events, the multivariable model size was prespecified, with baseline pretreatment T2 forced into the model. To assess the incremental prognostic value of T2, a clinicopathologic model was compared with a full model additionally including baseline pretreatment T2. The full model was refitted in the entire cohort and presented as a nomogram. Internal validation was performed using 1000 bootstrap resamples. Model performance was assessed by Harrell’s concordance index (C-index), bootstrap-estimated calibration slope, bootstrap calibration plots, time-dependent receiver operating characteristic analysis, and decision curve analysis.</p><h3>Results</h3><p>During a median follow-up of 51 months after surgery, 35 of 116 patients (30.2%) experienced DFS events. In multivariable analysis, EMVI positivity (HR 2.42, 95% CI 1.21–4.68; <i>p</i> = 0.013), ypN-positive status (HR 4.37, 95% CI 2.07–9.92; <i>p</i> < 0.001), and perineural invasion (HR 3.97, 95% CI 1.90–8.29; <i>p</i> < 0.001) were independently associated with worse DFS, whereas a higher baseline pretreatment T2 value was independently associated with better DFS (HR 0.88, 95% CI 0.82–0.94; <i>p</i> < 0.001). The full model included baseline pretreatment T2, EMVI, ypN status, and perineural invasion. After refitting in the entire cohort, the model showed an apparent C-index of 0.796 and an optimism-corrected C-index of 0.780 after 1000 bootstrap resamples. The bootstrap-estimated calibration slope was 0.914, and calibration plots showed reasonable agreement between predicted and observed 3-year and 5-year DFS probabilities.</p><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>A postoperative risk stratification model integrating baseline quantitative T2 mapping with postoperative histopathologic factors showed potential value for estimating DFS risk in locally advanced non-mucinous rectal adenocarcinoma. Lower baseline T2 values may reflect a more aggressive tumor microenvironment characterized by greater cellularity and denser fibrotic stroma, which may partly explain their association with worse DFS. After bootstrap internal validation, the model demonstrated acceptable discrimination and reasonable calibration, although external validation is required before clinical application.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":7126,"journal":{"name":"Abdominal Radiology","volume":"51 10","pages":"4834 - 4848"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Abdominal Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00261-026-05480-7","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objectives
To develop a postoperative risk stratification model integrating baseline T2 mapping and histopathologic factors for predicting disease-free survival (DFS) in patients with locally advanced non-mucinous rectal adenocarcinoma after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (NCRT) and surgery.
Methods
This retrospective study included 116 patients with non-mucinous rectal adenocarcinoma who underwent NCRT followed by surgery. Baseline T2 values and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values were measured. Prognostic factors for DFS were assessed using Cox proportional hazards regression. Given the limited number of DFS events, the multivariable model size was prespecified, with baseline pretreatment T2 forced into the model. To assess the incremental prognostic value of T2, a clinicopathologic model was compared with a full model additionally including baseline pretreatment T2. The full model was refitted in the entire cohort and presented as a nomogram. Internal validation was performed using 1000 bootstrap resamples. Model performance was assessed by Harrell’s concordance index (C-index), bootstrap-estimated calibration slope, bootstrap calibration plots, time-dependent receiver operating characteristic analysis, and decision curve analysis.
Results
During a median follow-up of 51 months after surgery, 35 of 116 patients (30.2%) experienced DFS events. In multivariable analysis, EMVI positivity (HR 2.42, 95% CI 1.21–4.68; p = 0.013), ypN-positive status (HR 4.37, 95% CI 2.07–9.92; p < 0.001), and perineural invasion (HR 3.97, 95% CI 1.90–8.29; p < 0.001) were independently associated with worse DFS, whereas a higher baseline pretreatment T2 value was independently associated with better DFS (HR 0.88, 95% CI 0.82–0.94; p < 0.001). The full model included baseline pretreatment T2, EMVI, ypN status, and perineural invasion. After refitting in the entire cohort, the model showed an apparent C-index of 0.796 and an optimism-corrected C-index of 0.780 after 1000 bootstrap resamples. The bootstrap-estimated calibration slope was 0.914, and calibration plots showed reasonable agreement between predicted and observed 3-year and 5-year DFS probabilities.
Conclusion
A postoperative risk stratification model integrating baseline quantitative T2 mapping with postoperative histopathologic factors showed potential value for estimating DFS risk in locally advanced non-mucinous rectal adenocarcinoma. Lower baseline T2 values may reflect a more aggressive tumor microenvironment characterized by greater cellularity and denser fibrotic stroma, which may partly explain their association with worse DFS. After bootstrap internal validation, the model demonstrated acceptable discrimination and reasonable calibration, although external validation is required before clinical application.
目的:建立一种综合基线T2制图和组织病理学因素的术后风险分层模型,用于预测局部晚期非粘液性直肠腺癌患者在新辅助放化疗(NCRT)和手术后的无病生存(DFS)。方法:本回顾性研究包括116例非黏液性直肠腺癌患者,他们接受了NCRT手术。测量基线T2值和表观扩散系数(ADC)值。采用Cox比例风险回归评估DFS的预后因素。考虑到DFS事件的数量有限,我们预先设定了多变量模型的大小,并将基线预处理T2强制引入模型。为了评估T2的增量预后价值,将临床病理模型与包括基线预处理T2的完整模型进行比较。在整个队列中重新调整完整模型,并以nomogram形式呈现。使用1000个bootstrap样本进行内部验证。采用Harrell’s concordance index (C-index)、自举校准斜率、自举校准图、随时间变化的接收机工作特性分析和决策曲线分析来评估模型的性能。结果:在手术后51个月的中位随访期间,116名患者中有35名(30.2%)经历了DFS事件。在多变量分析中,EMVI阳性(HR 2.42, 95% CI 1.21-4.68; p = 0.013), ypn阳性状态(HR 4.37, 95% CI 2.07-9.92; p)结论:将基线定量T2制图与术后组织病理因素相结合的术后风险分层模型对评估局部晚期非粘液性直肠腺癌的DFS风险具有潜在价值。较低的基线T2值可能反映出肿瘤微环境更具侵袭性,其特征是更大的细胞性和更致密的纤维化基质,这可能部分解释了它们与更差的DFS的关联。尽管在临床应用前需要外部验证,但在bootstrap内部验证后,模型显示出可接受的辨别和合理的校准。
期刊介绍:
Abdominal Radiology seeks to meet the professional needs of the abdominal radiologist by publishing clinically pertinent original, review and practice related articles on the gastrointestinal and genitourinary tracts and abdominal interventional and radiologic procedures. Case reports are generally not accepted unless they are the first report of a new disease or condition, or part of a special solicited section.
Reasons to Publish Your Article in Abdominal Radiology:
· Official journal of the Society of Abdominal Radiology (SAR)
· Published in Cooperation with:
European Society of Gastrointestinal and Abdominal Radiology (ESGAR)
European Society of Urogenital Radiology (ESUR)
Asian Society of Abdominal Radiology (ASAR)
· Efficient handling and Expeditious review
· Author feedback is provided in a mentoring style
· Global readership
· Readers can earn CME credits