Darelle Toki, Karyn Maclennan, Philip C Hill, Susan McAllister
{"title":"The engagement of Indigenous populations in tuberculosis control - with a focus on contact tracing: a scoping review.","authors":"Darelle Toki, Karyn Maclennan, Philip C Hill, Susan McAllister","doi":"10.1080/13557858.2026.2655618","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Tuberculosis (TB) remains a major global public health concern that disproportionately affects Indigenous people. Contact tracing and early identification of those exposed to TB is essential for TB control. This study assesses the engagement of Indigenous populations for TB control against international and national TB guidelines.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A scoping review was conducted using five databases: PubMed, EMBASE, Global Health, Web of Science, and Google Scholar. Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) were used depending on the search engine and functionality. Key search terms included 'Tuberculosis,' 'Contact tracing' and 'Indigenous population/people(s),' and Indigenous populations by name including Māori, Native American, Aboriginal, First Nations, Inuit, Torres Strait, American Indian, Alaska Native, Native Hawaiian and Pacific Islanders. Articles published between 1 January 2000 and 1 July 2024, in the English language, were included. Grey literature was examined for relevant guidelines on Indigenous engagement in TB control and articles were scored against key indicators found in the guidelines.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-eight studies from eight countries were reviewed and assessed against five key indicators identified in the international guidelines and national guidelines. Many studies provided limited details on how they engaged with Indigenous populations, which resulted in low scores. No study met all five key indicators, and 32% did not meet any of the five indicators.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This review highlights the lack of consistency in the engagement of Indigenous populations in published TB control efforts, as well as differences between national TB guidelines. These findings underscore the urgent need to strengthen and align national guidelines with international standards as part of progress towards TB elimination.</p>","PeriodicalId":51038,"journal":{"name":"Ethnicity & Health","volume":" ","pages":"499-515"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ethnicity & Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13557858.2026.2655618","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/4/9 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ETHNIC STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objectives: Tuberculosis (TB) remains a major global public health concern that disproportionately affects Indigenous people. Contact tracing and early identification of those exposed to TB is essential for TB control. This study assesses the engagement of Indigenous populations for TB control against international and national TB guidelines.
Design: A scoping review was conducted using five databases: PubMed, EMBASE, Global Health, Web of Science, and Google Scholar. Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) were used depending on the search engine and functionality. Key search terms included 'Tuberculosis,' 'Contact tracing' and 'Indigenous population/people(s),' and Indigenous populations by name including Māori, Native American, Aboriginal, First Nations, Inuit, Torres Strait, American Indian, Alaska Native, Native Hawaiian and Pacific Islanders. Articles published between 1 January 2000 and 1 July 2024, in the English language, were included. Grey literature was examined for relevant guidelines on Indigenous engagement in TB control and articles were scored against key indicators found in the guidelines.
Results: Twenty-eight studies from eight countries were reviewed and assessed against five key indicators identified in the international guidelines and national guidelines. Many studies provided limited details on how they engaged with Indigenous populations, which resulted in low scores. No study met all five key indicators, and 32% did not meet any of the five indicators.
Conclusion: This review highlights the lack of consistency in the engagement of Indigenous populations in published TB control efforts, as well as differences between national TB guidelines. These findings underscore the urgent need to strengthen and align national guidelines with international standards as part of progress towards TB elimination.
目标:结核病仍然是一个主要的全球公共卫生问题,对土著人民的影响尤为严重。追踪接触者和早期识别结核接触者对结核控制至关重要。本研究根据国际和国家结核病指南评估了土著居民参与结核病控制的情况。设计:使用5个数据库进行范围审查:PubMed、EMBASE、Global Health、Web of Science和谷歌Scholar。医学主题标题(MeSH)的使用取决于搜索引擎和功能。关键搜索词包括“肺结核”、“接触者追踪”和“土著人口/人民”,以及土著人口的名字,包括Māori、美洲原住民、原住民、第一民族、因纽特人、托雷斯海峡、美洲印第安人、阿拉斯加原住民、夏威夷原住民和太平洋岛民。2000年1月1日至2024年7月1日期间发表的英文文章也包括在内。对灰色文献进行了审查,以寻找土著居民参与结核病控制的相关指南,并根据指南中的关键指标对文章进行了评分。结果:根据国际指南和国家指南中确定的五个关键指标,对来自八个国家的28项研究进行了审查和评估。许多研究对他们如何与土著居民交往提供了有限的细节,这导致了较低的分数。没有一项研究满足所有五个关键指标,32%的研究不满足任何一个指标。结论:本综述强调了土著居民参与已发表的结核病控制工作方面缺乏一致性,以及国家结核病指南之间的差异。这些发现强调迫切需要加强国家指南并使其与国际标准保持一致,作为消除结核病进展的一部分。
期刊介绍:
Ethnicity & Health
is an international academic journal designed to meet the world-wide interest in the health of ethnic groups. It embraces original papers from the full range of disciplines concerned with investigating the relationship between ’ethnicity’ and ’health’ (including medicine and nursing, public health, epidemiology, social sciences, population sciences, and statistics). The journal also covers issues of culture, religion, gender, class, migration, lifestyle and racism, in so far as they relate to health and its anthropological and social aspects.