Histological Predictors of Anastomotic Stenosis in Esophageal Substitution Surgery.

IF 1.2 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Vania Cazares-García, Francisco-Rafael Higuera-Hidalgo, Agustin Etchegaray-Donde, Alan-de-Jesus Martinez-Salas, Ana Alfaro-Cruz, Ernesto Roldan-Valadez
{"title":"Histological Predictors of Anastomotic Stenosis in Esophageal Substitution Surgery.","authors":"Vania Cazares-García, Francisco-Rafael Higuera-Hidalgo, Agustin Etchegaray-Donde, Alan-de-Jesus Martinez-Salas, Ana Alfaro-Cruz, Ernesto Roldan-Valadez","doi":"10.3121/cmr.2025.2041","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Objective:</b> To evaluate histopathological markers of inflammation and tissue repair in esophageal specimens obtained during substitution surgery and determine their association with postoperative anastomotic stenosis.<b>Design:</b> Retrospective cross-sectional study.<b>Setting:</b> Tertiary care referral center (Clínica de Tracto Digestivo Superior, Hospital General de México \"Dr. Eduardo Liceaga\").<b>Participants:</b> Sixteen adults undergoing esophageal substitution for benign disease between January 2012 and January 2022. Inclusion required complete clinical records and native esophageal histology; cases with malignancy or missing histology were excluded.<b>Methods:</b> Archived slides from the proximal esophageal margin were reviewed with hematoxylin and eosin and Masson's trichrome. A semi-quantitative score assessed neutrophilic infiltration, lymphocytic infiltration, collagen deposition, and granulation tissue across mucosa, submucosa, and muscularis (range 0-18), classifying profiles as low risk (≤15) or high risk (≥16). Patients were grouped by presence (CEA) or absence (SEA) of postoperative stenosis. Statistical comparisons used Fisher's exact test and Mann-Whitney U, with medians (IQR) and exact p-values.<b>Results:</b> Median total histological scores were higher in CEA than SEA (18 [17-18] vs 12 [9-15]; <i>P</i>=0.014). All stenosis cases were high-risk, whereas 92.3% of non-stenosis cases were low-risk (<i>P</i>=0.007). Individual inflammatory markers were not statistically different between groups; however, collagen deposition and granulation tissue appeared more severe among CEA patients. No meaningful differences in demographic or operative variables were observed.<b>Conclusion:</b> In this exploratory study, a composite histopathological score identified patients at increased risk of postoperative anastomotic stenosis. The approach may support risk stratification and surveillance in gastrointestinal reconstructive surgery and warrants external validation.</p>","PeriodicalId":47429,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Medicine & Research","volume":"24 1","pages":"20-27"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13061303/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Medicine & Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3121/cmr.2025.2041","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate histopathological markers of inflammation and tissue repair in esophageal specimens obtained during substitution surgery and determine their association with postoperative anastomotic stenosis.Design: Retrospective cross-sectional study.Setting: Tertiary care referral center (Clínica de Tracto Digestivo Superior, Hospital General de México "Dr. Eduardo Liceaga").Participants: Sixteen adults undergoing esophageal substitution for benign disease between January 2012 and January 2022. Inclusion required complete clinical records and native esophageal histology; cases with malignancy or missing histology were excluded.Methods: Archived slides from the proximal esophageal margin were reviewed with hematoxylin and eosin and Masson's trichrome. A semi-quantitative score assessed neutrophilic infiltration, lymphocytic infiltration, collagen deposition, and granulation tissue across mucosa, submucosa, and muscularis (range 0-18), classifying profiles as low risk (≤15) or high risk (≥16). Patients were grouped by presence (CEA) or absence (SEA) of postoperative stenosis. Statistical comparisons used Fisher's exact test and Mann-Whitney U, with medians (IQR) and exact p-values.Results: Median total histological scores were higher in CEA than SEA (18 [17-18] vs 12 [9-15]; P=0.014). All stenosis cases were high-risk, whereas 92.3% of non-stenosis cases were low-risk (P=0.007). Individual inflammatory markers were not statistically different between groups; however, collagen deposition and granulation tissue appeared more severe among CEA patients. No meaningful differences in demographic or operative variables were observed.Conclusion: In this exploratory study, a composite histopathological score identified patients at increased risk of postoperative anastomotic stenosis. The approach may support risk stratification and surveillance in gastrointestinal reconstructive surgery and warrants external validation.

食管置换手术中吻合口狭窄的组织学预测因素。
目的:评价替代手术中食管标本炎症和组织修复的组织病理学指标,并探讨其与术后吻合口狭窄的关系。设计:回顾性横断面研究。环境:三级保健转诊中心(Clínica de Tracto gastrovo Superior, m - xico总医院“ Eduardo Liceaga博士”)。参与者:2012年1月至2022年1月期间接受良性疾病食管替代治疗的16名成年人。纳入需要完整的临床记录和原生食管组织学;排除恶性肿瘤或组织学缺失的病例。方法:用苏木精、伊红和马松三色对食管近缘切片进行回顾性分析。半定量评分评估嗜中性粒细胞浸润、淋巴细胞浸润、胶原沉积和肉芽组织跨越粘膜、粘膜下层和肌肉层(范围0-18),将其分为低风险(≤15)或高风险(≥16)。根据术后狭窄存在(CEA)或不存在(SEA)进行分组。统计比较使用Fisher的精确检验和Mann-Whitney U,使用中位数(IQR)和精确p值。结果:CEA的中位总组织学评分高于SEA (18 [17-18] vs 12 [9-15]; P=0.014)。所有狭窄病例均为高危,无狭窄病例92.3%为低危(P=0.007)。各组间单项炎症指标差异无统计学意义;而胶原沉积和肉芽组织在CEA患者中表现更为严重。在人口统计学或手术变量方面没有观察到有意义的差异。结论:在这项探索性研究中,综合组织病理学评分确定了术后吻合口狭窄风险增加的患者。该方法可以支持胃肠重建手术的风险分层和监测,并需要外部验证。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Clinical Medicine & Research
Clinical Medicine & Research MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
7.10%
发文量
25
期刊介绍: Clinical Medicine & Research is a peer reviewed publication of original scientific medical research that is relevant to a broad audience of medical researchers and healthcare professionals. Articles are published quarterly in the following topics: -Medicine -Clinical Research -Evidence-based Medicine -Preventive Medicine -Translational Medicine -Rural Health -Case Reports -Epidemiology -Basic science -History of Medicine -The Art of Medicine -Non-Clinical Aspects of Medicine & Science
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书