[Repetitive intentional foreign body ingestion: Risk of abuse of propofol in endoscopic procedures].

IF 1.1 4区 医学 Q4 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Elena Böttcher, Tim Papenfuß, Maximilian Gahr
{"title":"[Repetitive intentional foreign body ingestion: Risk of abuse of propofol in endoscopic procedures].","authors":"Elena Böttcher, Tim Papenfuß, Maximilian Gahr","doi":"10.1007/s00115-026-01967-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Intentional foreign body ingestion (iFBI) represents an increasingly relevant clinical challenge that remains insufficiently evidence based in terms of treatment. Existing somatic (gastroenterologic) and psychiatric care structures may contribute to the maintenance of this behavior.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The aim of the present study is to highlight an aspect of the treatment of iFBI that has received little attention to date: the potential risk of misuse and dependence associated with propofol in the context of repeated endoscopic interventions. Our goal is to raise awareness that for vulnerable patient groups with iFBI such as individuals with borderline personality disorder (BPD), propofol should be considered not only as an anesthetic agent but also as a substance with dependency potential and as a positive dysfunctional reinforcer within complex behavioral patterns.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>Narrative review of the pharmacological characteristics as well as the potential for misuse and addictive potential of propofol in the context of endoscopic interventions, based on published literature (case reports and retrospective studies).</p><p><strong>Results and discussion: </strong>The literature reports euphoric and anxiolytic effects of propofol related to endoscopic procedures, which may persist beyond the immediate post-procedural period. In addition, a potential risk of propofol misuse and dependence is discussed in the context of endoscopic interventions. When indirect propofol misuse is suspected in the setting of intentional foreign body ingestion (iFBI), alternative sedation strategies should be considered.</p>","PeriodicalId":49770,"journal":{"name":"Nervenarzt","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nervenarzt","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00115-026-01967-2","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Intentional foreign body ingestion (iFBI) represents an increasingly relevant clinical challenge that remains insufficiently evidence based in terms of treatment. Existing somatic (gastroenterologic) and psychiatric care structures may contribute to the maintenance of this behavior.

Objective: The aim of the present study is to highlight an aspect of the treatment of iFBI that has received little attention to date: the potential risk of misuse and dependence associated with propofol in the context of repeated endoscopic interventions. Our goal is to raise awareness that for vulnerable patient groups with iFBI such as individuals with borderline personality disorder (BPD), propofol should be considered not only as an anesthetic agent but also as a substance with dependency potential and as a positive dysfunctional reinforcer within complex behavioral patterns.

Material and methods: Narrative review of the pharmacological characteristics as well as the potential for misuse and addictive potential of propofol in the context of endoscopic interventions, based on published literature (case reports and retrospective studies).

Results and discussion: The literature reports euphoric and anxiolytic effects of propofol related to endoscopic procedures, which may persist beyond the immediate post-procedural period. In addition, a potential risk of propofol misuse and dependence is discussed in the context of endoscopic interventions. When indirect propofol misuse is suspected in the setting of intentional foreign body ingestion (iFBI), alternative sedation strategies should be considered.

反复故意异物摄入:内窥镜手术中滥用异丙酚的风险
背景:故意异物摄入(iFBI)是一个日益相关的临床挑战,但在治疗方面仍缺乏足够的证据。现有的躯体(胃肠病学)和精神护理结构可能有助于维持这种行为。目的:本研究的目的是强调迄今为止很少受到关注的iFBI治疗的一个方面:在反复内镜干预的背景下与异丙酚相关的滥用和依赖的潜在风险。我们的目标是提高人们对iFBI弱势患者群体的认识,如边缘型人格障碍(BPD)患者,异丙酚不仅应被视为麻醉剂,而且应被视为具有依赖性的物质,并在复杂的行为模式中作为积极的功能失调强化剂。材料和方法:基于已发表的文献(病例报告和回顾性研究),对内窥镜干预背景下异丙酚的药理学特征以及滥用和成瘾潜力进行叙述性回顾。结果和讨论:文献报道了异丙酚与内窥镜手术有关的兴奋和焦虑作用,这种作用可能会持续到手术后。此外,异丙酚滥用和依赖的潜在风险在内镜干预的背景下进行了讨论。当怀疑在故意异物摄入(iFBI)的情况下间接滥用异丙酚时,应考虑其他镇静策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Nervenarzt
Nervenarzt 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
18.20%
发文量
169
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Der Nervenarzt is an internationally recognized journal addressing neurologists and psychiatrists working in clinical or practical environments. Essential findings and current information from neurology, psychiatry as well as neuropathology, neurosurgery up to psychotherapy are presented. Review articles provide an overview on selected topics and offer the reader a summary of current findings from all fields of neurology and psychiatry. Freely submitted original papers allow the presentation of important clinical studies and serve the scientific exchange. Review articles under the rubric ''Continuing Medical Education'' present verified results of scientific research and their integration into daily practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书