Fluoroscopic Pericardiocentesis by Cardiac Surgeons: Hybrid Setup Outcomes.

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgeon Pub Date : 2026-09-01 Epub Date: 2026-04-08 DOI:10.1055/a-2849-6543
Erturk Karaagac, Nuri Utkan Tunca, Serkan Yazman, Hasan Iner, Yuksel Besir, Levent Yilik, Ali Gurbuz
{"title":"Fluoroscopic Pericardiocentesis by Cardiac Surgeons: Hybrid Setup Outcomes.","authors":"Erturk Karaagac, Nuri Utkan Tunca, Serkan Yazman, Hasan Iner, Yuksel Besir, Levent Yilik, Ali Gurbuz","doi":"10.1055/a-2849-6543","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Pericardiocentesis is a life-saving intervention in the treatment of cardiac tamponade. This study aims to evaluate the safety, efficacy, and short-term outcomes of fluoroscopy-guided pericardiocentesis performed by cardiovascular surgeons in a hybrid operating room setting.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data from 64 patients who underwent fluoroscopy-guided percutaneous drainage for symptomatic pericardial effusion in a hybrid operating room between January 2020 and December 2024 were analyzed retrospectively. Procedures were performed using a standard subxiphoid approach and a pigtail catheter.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The etiology was malignancy in 31.2% (<i>n</i> = 20) of the patients. The median maximum effusion diameter measured on preoperative echocardiography was 24 mm (interquartile range [IQR]: 20-28 mm), which decreased significantly to 7 mm (IQR: 5-9 mm) on postoperative evaluation (<i>p</i> < 0.001). The minor complication rate was 1.5% (<i>n</i> = 1, pneumothorax). No surgical conversion (sternotomy) was required during the procedures. Reintervention was required in only two patients (3.1%) during the 3-month follow-up.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Fluoroscopy-guided pericardiocentesis performed under hybrid operating room conditions represents a safe option with low complication and recurrence rates, even in high-risk groups such as malignancy. The real-time anatomical visualization provided by fluoroscopy, combined with the surgical infrastructure of the hybrid environment, provides a feasible workflow for cardiac surgeons. However, these findings need to be supported by more extensive and comparative studies.</p>","PeriodicalId":23057,"journal":{"name":"Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgeon","volume":" ","pages":"455-459"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgeon","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2849-6543","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/4/8 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Pericardiocentesis is a life-saving intervention in the treatment of cardiac tamponade. This study aims to evaluate the safety, efficacy, and short-term outcomes of fluoroscopy-guided pericardiocentesis performed by cardiovascular surgeons in a hybrid operating room setting.

Methods: Data from 64 patients who underwent fluoroscopy-guided percutaneous drainage for symptomatic pericardial effusion in a hybrid operating room between January 2020 and December 2024 were analyzed retrospectively. Procedures were performed using a standard subxiphoid approach and a pigtail catheter.

Results: The etiology was malignancy in 31.2% (n = 20) of the patients. The median maximum effusion diameter measured on preoperative echocardiography was 24 mm (interquartile range [IQR]: 20-28 mm), which decreased significantly to 7 mm (IQR: 5-9 mm) on postoperative evaluation (p < 0.001). The minor complication rate was 1.5% (n = 1, pneumothorax). No surgical conversion (sternotomy) was required during the procedures. Reintervention was required in only two patients (3.1%) during the 3-month follow-up.

Conclusion: Fluoroscopy-guided pericardiocentesis performed under hybrid operating room conditions represents a safe option with low complication and recurrence rates, even in high-risk groups such as malignancy. The real-time anatomical visualization provided by fluoroscopy, combined with the surgical infrastructure of the hybrid environment, provides a feasible workflow for cardiac surgeons. However, these findings need to be supported by more extensive and comparative studies.

心脏外科医生的透视心包穿刺术:混合设置结果。
背景:心包穿刺术是治疗心包填塞的救命手段。本研究旨在评估由心血管外科医生在混合手术室环境下在透视引导下进行心包穿刺术的安全性、有效性和短期结果。方法:回顾性分析2020年1月至2024年12月在混合手术室行透视引导下经皮引流治疗症状性心包积液的64例患者的资料。手术采用标准剑突下入路和猪尾导管。结果:恶性肿瘤占31.2%(20例)。术前超声心动图测得的最大积液直径中位数为24 mm (IQR: 20 ~ 28 mm),术后评价为7 mm (IQR: 5 ~ 9 mm),差异有统计学意义(p < 0.001)。轻微并发症发生率为1.5% (n=1,气胸)。在手术过程中不需要手术转换(胸骨切开术)。在三个月的随访期间,只有2例患者(3.1%)需要再次干预。结论:在混合手术室条件下进行透视引导下的心包穿刺术是一种安全的选择,并发症和复发率低,即使在恶性肿瘤等高危人群中也是如此。透视提供的实时解剖可视化,结合混合环境的手术基础设施,为心脏外科医生提供了可行的工作流程。然而,这些发现需要更广泛和比较的研究来支持。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
6.70%
发文量
365
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgeon publishes articles of the highest standard from internationally recognized thoracic and cardiovascular surgeons, cardiologists, anesthesiologists, physiologists, and pathologists. This journal is an essential resource for anyone working in this field. Original articles, short communications, reviews and important meeting announcements keep you abreast of key clinical advances, as well as providing the theoretical background of cardiovascular and thoracic surgery. Case reports are published in our Open Access companion journal The Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgeon Reports.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书