Latent Profiles of Callous Unemotional Traits and Conduct Problems in Clinically Referred Youth.

IF 2.7 2区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL
Peter J Castagna, Polina Perelstein, Daniel A Waschbusch
{"title":"Latent Profiles of Callous Unemotional Traits and Conduct Problems in Clinically Referred Youth.","authors":"Peter J Castagna, Polina Perelstein, Daniel A Waschbusch","doi":"10.1007/s10802-026-01457-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study aimed to examined whether multidimensional callous-unemotional (CU) traits and conduct problems (CP) yield distinct latent profiles in a clinically referred sample of youth, and if these profiles differ on externalizing symptoms, aggression, irritability, and CU-related impairment. Participants were 290 clinically referred youth (57.9% male) aged 8–16 years (M = 10.40, SD = 2.33) and primarily identified as White (85.9%). Diagnoses included ADHD (90.7%), ODD (35.3%), and CD (3.5%). Mothers completed the Inventory of Callous-Unemotional Traits, Disruptive Behavior Disorders Rating Scale, Nova Scotia Modified IOWA Conners, Affective Reactivity Index, the Callous-Unemotional Problems and Impairment scale, Screen for Child Anxiety Related Disorders, and Short Mood and Feelings Questionnaire. Latent profile analysis was conducted using four ICU facets and a CP score to derive subtypes. A four-profile solution emerged: High CU/CP (16.2%), Emotionally Detached (32.8%), Low CU/CP (35.9%), and Remorseless–Callous (15.2%). Profiles differed significantly on CU and CP indicators (partial η² = 0.15). High CU/CP and Remorseless–Callous groups showed elevated ODD and CD diagnoses, proactive/reactive aggression, irritability, depression, and CU impairment compared to Emotionally Detached and Low CU/CP profiles. The High CU/CP class exhibited the highest slow dissipation of aggression, whereas the Remorseless–Callous class had greater relational aggression. The Emotionally Detached group had lower rates of anxiety. Multidimensional CU trait analysis revealed clinically distinct subtypes, including a novel Emotionally Detached profile. These findings underscore heterogeneity in CU presentations and highlight the need for tailored assessment and intervention. Future research should evaluate the stability and treatment responsiveness of these profiles.</p>","PeriodicalId":36218,"journal":{"name":"Research on Child and Adolescent Psychopathology","volume":"54 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research on Child and Adolescent Psychopathology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10802-026-01457-8","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study aimed to examined whether multidimensional callous-unemotional (CU) traits and conduct problems (CP) yield distinct latent profiles in a clinically referred sample of youth, and if these profiles differ on externalizing symptoms, aggression, irritability, and CU-related impairment. Participants were 290 clinically referred youth (57.9% male) aged 8–16 years (M = 10.40, SD = 2.33) and primarily identified as White (85.9%). Diagnoses included ADHD (90.7%), ODD (35.3%), and CD (3.5%). Mothers completed the Inventory of Callous-Unemotional Traits, Disruptive Behavior Disorders Rating Scale, Nova Scotia Modified IOWA Conners, Affective Reactivity Index, the Callous-Unemotional Problems and Impairment scale, Screen for Child Anxiety Related Disorders, and Short Mood and Feelings Questionnaire. Latent profile analysis was conducted using four ICU facets and a CP score to derive subtypes. A four-profile solution emerged: High CU/CP (16.2%), Emotionally Detached (32.8%), Low CU/CP (35.9%), and Remorseless–Callous (15.2%). Profiles differed significantly on CU and CP indicators (partial η² = 0.15). High CU/CP and Remorseless–Callous groups showed elevated ODD and CD diagnoses, proactive/reactive aggression, irritability, depression, and CU impairment compared to Emotionally Detached and Low CU/CP profiles. The High CU/CP class exhibited the highest slow dissipation of aggression, whereas the Remorseless–Callous class had greater relational aggression. The Emotionally Detached group had lower rates of anxiety. Multidimensional CU trait analysis revealed clinically distinct subtypes, including a novel Emotionally Detached profile. These findings underscore heterogeneity in CU presentations and highlight the need for tailored assessment and intervention. Future research should evaluate the stability and treatment responsiveness of these profiles.

临床转介青少年冷酷无情特质与行为问题的潜在特征。
本研究旨在探讨多维冷酷无情(CU)特征和行为问题(CP)是否在临床参考的青年样本中产生不同的潜在特征,以及这些特征在外化症状、攻击、易怒和CU相关损伤方面是否存在差异。参与者为290名8-16岁的临床转诊青年(57.9%为男性)(M = 10.40, SD = 2.33),主要为白人(85.9%)。诊断包括ADHD(90.7%)、ODD(35.3%)和CD(3.5%)。母亲们完成了冷酷无情特质量表、破坏性行为障碍评定量表、新斯科舍修正爱荷华量表、情感反应指数、冷酷无情问题与损害量表、儿童焦虑相关障碍筛查和短期情绪与感受问卷。使用四个ICU方面和CP评分进行潜在剖面分析以得出亚型。出现了四种类型的解决方案:高CU/CP(16.2%)、情感超然(32.8%)、低CU/CP(35.9%)和冷酷无情(15.2%)。各剖面在CU和CP指标上差异显著(偏η²= 0.15)。高CU/CP组和冷酷无情组与低CU/CP组相比,ODD和CD诊断、主动/反应性攻击、易怒、抑郁和CU损伤升高。高CU/CP组的攻击缓慢消散程度最高,而冷酷无情组的关系攻击消散程度更高。情感超然组的焦虑率较低。多维CU特征分析揭示了临床不同的亚型,包括一种新的情感超脱型。这些发现强调了CU表现的异质性,并强调了量身定制评估和干预的必要性。未来的研究应评估这些剖面的稳定性和治疗反应性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Research on Child and Adolescent Psychopathology
Research on Child and Adolescent Psychopathology Psychology-Developmental and Educational Psychology
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
4.00%
发文量
107
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书