Standardisation of histologic reporting in eosinophilic oesophagitis: Expert recommendations.

IF 2.9 Q1 PATHOLOGY
Carla Giordano, Valentina Angerilli, Marco Masci, Maria D'Armiento, Paola Parente, Emanuela Pilozzi, Alessandro Vanoli, Salvatore Oliva, Edoardo Vincenzo Savarino, Matteo Fassan, Luca Mastracci
{"title":"Standardisation of histologic reporting in eosinophilic oesophagitis: Expert recommendations.","authors":"Carla Giordano, Valentina Angerilli, Marco Masci, Maria D'Armiento, Paola Parente, Emanuela Pilozzi, Alessandro Vanoli, Salvatore Oliva, Edoardo Vincenzo Savarino, Matteo Fassan, Luca Mastracci","doi":"10.32074/1591-951X-1842","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Over the past decade, significant progress has been made in understanding eosinophilic oesophagitis (EoE), leading to the refinement of diagnostic criteria and the development of evidence-based management guidelines. Nevertheless, despite the central role of histology in both diagnosis and disease monitoring, significant variability remains in histopathological reporting across institutions and among pathologists.This study seeks to provide recommendations for standardised histological reporting in EoE. To this end, a multidisciplinary panel of gastroenterologists and pathologists convened to review current practices and address persistent challenges in histologic assessment. Through an extensive literature review and critical appraisal of existing scoring systems, the panel reached consensus on both essential and desirable histological features for routine reporting, including eosinophil counts, additional inflammatory parameters, and fibrostenotic changes.</p>","PeriodicalId":45893,"journal":{"name":"PATHOLOGICA","volume":"118 1","pages":"4-14"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13094330/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PATHOLOGICA","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32074/1591-951X-1842","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Over the past decade, significant progress has been made in understanding eosinophilic oesophagitis (EoE), leading to the refinement of diagnostic criteria and the development of evidence-based management guidelines. Nevertheless, despite the central role of histology in both diagnosis and disease monitoring, significant variability remains in histopathological reporting across institutions and among pathologists.This study seeks to provide recommendations for standardised histological reporting in EoE. To this end, a multidisciplinary panel of gastroenterologists and pathologists convened to review current practices and address persistent challenges in histologic assessment. Through an extensive literature review and critical appraisal of existing scoring systems, the panel reached consensus on both essential and desirable histological features for routine reporting, including eosinophil counts, additional inflammatory parameters, and fibrostenotic changes.

嗜酸性粒细胞性食管炎组织学报告的标准化:专家建议。
在过去的十年中,在了解嗜酸性粒细胞性食管炎(EoE)方面取得了重大进展,导致了诊断标准的完善和循证管理指南的发展。然而,尽管组织学在诊断和疾病监测中发挥着核心作用,但在不同机构和病理学家之间的组织病理学报告中仍存在显著差异。本研究旨在为EoE的标准化组织学报告提供建议。为此,一个由胃肠病学家和病理学家组成的多学科小组召开会议,回顾当前的实践并解决组织学评估中持续存在的挑战。通过广泛的文献回顾和对现有评分系统的批判性评估,专家组就常规报告的基本和理想组织学特征达成了共识,包括嗜酸性粒细胞计数、附加炎症参数和纤维狭窄改变。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
PATHOLOGICA
PATHOLOGICA PATHOLOGY-
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
5.70%
发文量
108
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书