The cellular response capacity (CRC) as a novel immunomonitoring approach in sepsis.

IF 22.9 2区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Military Medical Research Pub Date : 2026-12-01 Epub Date: 2026-03-24 DOI:10.1016/j.mmr.2026.100010
David Alexander Christian Messerer, Paul Müller, Lisa Wohlgemuth, Frederik Münnich, Laura Stukan, Adam Omar Khalaf Mohamed, Jürgen Benjamin Hagemann, Alexander Sebastian Koller, Darko Jovanovski, Simon Lauer, Rebecca Traut, Leonard Schöbel, Bertram Dietrich Thomaß, Finn Münnich, Eberhard Barth, Manfred Weiss, Andreas Liebold, Bettina Jungwirth, Markus Huber-Lang
{"title":"The cellular response capacity (CRC) as a novel immunomonitoring approach in sepsis.","authors":"David Alexander Christian Messerer, Paul Müller, Lisa Wohlgemuth, Frederik Münnich, Laura Stukan, Adam Omar Khalaf Mohamed, Jürgen Benjamin Hagemann, Alexander Sebastian Koller, Darko Jovanovski, Simon Lauer, Rebecca Traut, Leonard Schöbel, Bertram Dietrich Thomaß, Finn Münnich, Eberhard Barth, Manfred Weiss, Andreas Liebold, Bettina Jungwirth, Markus Huber-Lang","doi":"10.1016/j.mmr.2026.100010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Early recognition of sepsis remains difficult in clinical practice because conventional humoral biomarkers such as C-reactive protein, procalcitonin, and interleukin-6 (IL-6) exhibit unfavorable, slow-release kinetics and rise hours after the onset of infection. Flow cytometry enables upstream, cell-based immunomonitoring, but its clinical use is restricted by poor standardization of fluorescence measurements. In this study, the neutrophil cellular response capacity (CRC) was developed and evaluated as a standardized approach for rapid assessment of systemic inflammation in bacteremia and sepsis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The CRC is based on a flow cytometry-based framework that defines a stable maximal stimulation reference point for neutrophil granulocytes. The CRC was evaluated in a human <i>ex vivo</i> whole blood bacteremia model with graded exposure to <i>Escherichia coli</i> and compared with humoral inflammatory markers. Next, the CRC was assessed in a prospective intensive care unit sepsis cohort. Moreover, preliminary validation was performed in an independent sepsis cohort and in patients undergoing cardiac surgery.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the bacteremia model, the CRC of neutrophil markers CD10, CD11b, and CD66b increased in a dose-dependent manner with increasing bacterial burden and detected inflammation at lower pathogen burdens than IL-6 and other humoral mediators, with a superior area under the receiver operating characteristic curve. In clinical sepsis, the CRC discriminated patients from age- and sex-matched healthy volunteers, with the CRC of CD11b showing the highest diagnostic performance. CRC values increased over time in patients with sepsis, consistent with immunological recovery. The maximal stimulation reference point for CD11b remained stable across inflammatory states, cohorts, and instruments. In addition, the CRC more precisely captured the onset and resolution of surgery-induced inflammation than conventional biomarkers.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The CRC provides a rapid, standardized, and robust cell-based immunomonitoring tool that outperforms traditional humoral markers in experimental bacteremia and reliably identifies sepsis in clinical cohorts, strongly supporting its use as a novel biomarker for earlier, more precise sepsis diagnosis and monitoring.</p>","PeriodicalId":18581,"journal":{"name":"Military Medical Research","volume":"13 1","pages":"100010"},"PeriodicalIF":22.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13054578/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Military Medical Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mmr.2026.100010","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/3/24 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Early recognition of sepsis remains difficult in clinical practice because conventional humoral biomarkers such as C-reactive protein, procalcitonin, and interleukin-6 (IL-6) exhibit unfavorable, slow-release kinetics and rise hours after the onset of infection. Flow cytometry enables upstream, cell-based immunomonitoring, but its clinical use is restricted by poor standardization of fluorescence measurements. In this study, the neutrophil cellular response capacity (CRC) was developed and evaluated as a standardized approach for rapid assessment of systemic inflammation in bacteremia and sepsis.

Methods: The CRC is based on a flow cytometry-based framework that defines a stable maximal stimulation reference point for neutrophil granulocytes. The CRC was evaluated in a human ex vivo whole blood bacteremia model with graded exposure to Escherichia coli and compared with humoral inflammatory markers. Next, the CRC was assessed in a prospective intensive care unit sepsis cohort. Moreover, preliminary validation was performed in an independent sepsis cohort and in patients undergoing cardiac surgery.

Results: In the bacteremia model, the CRC of neutrophil markers CD10, CD11b, and CD66b increased in a dose-dependent manner with increasing bacterial burden and detected inflammation at lower pathogen burdens than IL-6 and other humoral mediators, with a superior area under the receiver operating characteristic curve. In clinical sepsis, the CRC discriminated patients from age- and sex-matched healthy volunteers, with the CRC of CD11b showing the highest diagnostic performance. CRC values increased over time in patients with sepsis, consistent with immunological recovery. The maximal stimulation reference point for CD11b remained stable across inflammatory states, cohorts, and instruments. In addition, the CRC more precisely captured the onset and resolution of surgery-induced inflammation than conventional biomarkers.

Conclusions: The CRC provides a rapid, standardized, and robust cell-based immunomonitoring tool that outperforms traditional humoral markers in experimental bacteremia and reliably identifies sepsis in clinical cohorts, strongly supporting its use as a novel biomarker for earlier, more precise sepsis diagnosis and monitoring.

细胞反应能力(CRC)作为一种新的免疫监测方法在败血症。
背景:在临床实践中,早期识别脓毒症仍然很困难,因为传统的体液生物标志物,如c反应蛋白、降钙素原和白细胞介素-6 (IL-6)在感染发生数小时后表现出不利的缓释动力学和升高。流式细胞术能够实现上游的基于细胞的免疫监测,但其临床应用受到荧光测量标准化差的限制。在这项研究中,中性粒细胞反应能力(CRC)被开发和评估为一种标准化的方法,用于快速评估菌血症和败血症的全身炎症。方法:CRC是基于流式细胞术的框架,定义了中性粒细胞稳定的最大刺激参考点。CRC在人类离体全血菌血症模型中进行评估,该模型与大肠杆菌分级暴露,并与体液炎症标志物进行比较。接下来,在前瞻性重症监护病房脓毒症队列中评估结直肠癌。此外,在独立的败血症队列和接受心脏手术的患者中进行了初步验证。结果:在菌血症模型中,中性粒细胞标志物CD10、CD11b和CD66b的CRC随着细菌负荷的增加呈剂量依赖性增加,在较低的病原体负荷下检测到炎症,且受体工作特征曲线下的面积优于IL-6和其他体液介质。在临床脓毒症中,CRC区分年龄和性别匹配的健康志愿者,其中CD11b的CRC表现出最高的诊断性能。脓毒症患者CRC值随时间增加,与免疫恢复一致。CD11b的最大刺激参考点在炎症状态、队列和仪器中保持稳定。此外,CRC比传统的生物标志物更准确地捕捉到手术引起的炎症的发生和消退。结论:CRC提供了一种快速、标准化和强大的基于细胞的免疫监测工具,在实验菌血症中优于传统的体液标志物,并在临床队列中可靠地识别脓毒症,有力地支持其作为一种新的生物标志物用于更早、更精确的脓毒症诊断和监测。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Military Medical Research
Military Medical Research Medicine-General Medicine
CiteScore
38.40
自引率
2.80%
发文量
485
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊介绍: Military Medical Research is an open-access, peer-reviewed journal that aims to share the most up-to-date evidence and innovative discoveries in a wide range of fields, including basic and clinical sciences, translational research, precision medicine, emerging interdisciplinary subjects, and advanced technologies. Our primary focus is on modern military medicine; however, we also encourage submissions from other related areas. This includes, but is not limited to, basic medical research with the potential for translation into practice, as well as clinical research that could impact medical care both in times of warfare and during peacetime military operations.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书