Efficacy and safety study of different doses of linezolid in combination with bedaquiline in the treatment of drug-resistant pulmonary tuberculosis.

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q3 ONCOLOGY
Chemotherapy Pub Date : 2026-04-08 DOI:10.1159/000551380
Xin Wang, Dongpeng Geng, Xiaoling Wu, Zhen Guo, Conglong Ma, Xiaonan Ma, Xiaomin Hao, Panyun Xiao
{"title":"Efficacy and safety study of different doses of linezolid in combination with bedaquiline in the treatment of drug-resistant pulmonary tuberculosis.","authors":"Xin Wang, Dongpeng Geng, Xiaoling Wu, Zhen Guo, Conglong Ma, Xiaonan Ma, Xiaomin Hao, Panyun Xiao","doi":"10.1159/000551380","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Drug-resistant tuberculosis presents a major global health challenge due to limited therapeutic options and significant toxicity of traditional regimens. Linezolid, a core Group A drug per WHO guidelines, demonstrates high efficacy but its optimal dosing is debated due to dose-dependent adverse effects. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of different initial doses linezolid in combined with bedaquiline for treating drug-resistant pulmonary tuberculosis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective study analyzed patients with drug-resistant tuberculosis treated with bedaquiline and linezolid in China, June 2019-June 2022. Data originated from medical records. Adverse Drug Reactions (ADRs) were categorized using the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (v5.0). Three groups were formed based on initial linezolid dose: 1200 mg/d (high-dose, n=99), 600 mg/d (low-dose, n=121), and 0 mg/d (control, n=50). Clinical data, epidemiological characteristics, treatment outcomes, adverse events, and prognoses of these groups were compared and analyzed statistically.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Our research scrutinized the effects of different initial doses of linezolid and bedaquiline on drug-resistant tuberculosis. No significant differences were noted between high-dose and low-dose groups in 6 months sputum smear negativity, cavitary closure time or time for lesion resorption and reduction. However, a higher incidence of adverse events was observed in the high-dose group (47.47%) compared to the low-dose group (29.75%), with bone marrow suppression, peripheral neuropathy, and optic neuritis being predominant. Notably, the proportion of patients requiring dose adjustment due to adverse events was significantly higher in the high-dose group (74.47%) than in the low-dose group (50%, P=0.021).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Initial daily linezolid dose of 600 mg and 1,200 mg in combination with bedaquiline yield equivalent efficacy for drug-resistant pulmonary tuberculosis. The lower dose demonstrated improved tolerability. For the said therapy, we advocate a primary recommendation of a daily linezolid dose of 600 mg.</p>","PeriodicalId":10047,"journal":{"name":"Chemotherapy","volume":" ","pages":"1-17"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chemotherapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000551380","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Drug-resistant tuberculosis presents a major global health challenge due to limited therapeutic options and significant toxicity of traditional regimens. Linezolid, a core Group A drug per WHO guidelines, demonstrates high efficacy but its optimal dosing is debated due to dose-dependent adverse effects. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of different initial doses linezolid in combined with bedaquiline for treating drug-resistant pulmonary tuberculosis.

Methods: This retrospective study analyzed patients with drug-resistant tuberculosis treated with bedaquiline and linezolid in China, June 2019-June 2022. Data originated from medical records. Adverse Drug Reactions (ADRs) were categorized using the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (v5.0). Three groups were formed based on initial linezolid dose: 1200 mg/d (high-dose, n=99), 600 mg/d (low-dose, n=121), and 0 mg/d (control, n=50). Clinical data, epidemiological characteristics, treatment outcomes, adverse events, and prognoses of these groups were compared and analyzed statistically.

Results: Our research scrutinized the effects of different initial doses of linezolid and bedaquiline on drug-resistant tuberculosis. No significant differences were noted between high-dose and low-dose groups in 6 months sputum smear negativity, cavitary closure time or time for lesion resorption and reduction. However, a higher incidence of adverse events was observed in the high-dose group (47.47%) compared to the low-dose group (29.75%), with bone marrow suppression, peripheral neuropathy, and optic neuritis being predominant. Notably, the proportion of patients requiring dose adjustment due to adverse events was significantly higher in the high-dose group (74.47%) than in the low-dose group (50%, P=0.021).

Conclusions: Initial daily linezolid dose of 600 mg and 1,200 mg in combination with bedaquiline yield equivalent efficacy for drug-resistant pulmonary tuberculosis. The lower dose demonstrated improved tolerability. For the said therapy, we advocate a primary recommendation of a daily linezolid dose of 600 mg.

不同剂量利奈唑胺联合贝达喹啉治疗耐药肺结核的疗效和安全性研究。
导言:由于治疗选择有限和传统治疗方案的显著毒性,耐药结核病是一项重大的全球健康挑战。利奈唑胺是世卫组织指南规定的a类核心药物,它显示出高效率,但由于其剂量依赖性不良反应,其最佳剂量存在争议。本研究旨在评价不同初始剂量利奈唑胺联合贝达喹啉治疗耐药肺结核的疗效和安全性。方法:回顾性分析2019年6月- 2022年6月在中国接受贝达喹啉和利奈唑胺治疗的耐药结核病患者。数据来源于医疗记录。使用不良事件通用术语标准(v5.0)对药物不良反应(adr)进行分类。根据初始利奈唑胺剂量分为三组:1200mg /d(高剂量,n=99)、600mg /d(低剂量,n=121)和0mg /d(对照,n=50)。对两组患者的临床资料、流行病学特征、治疗结果、不良事件及预后进行比较分析。结果:我们的研究考察了不同初始剂量的利奈唑胺和贝达喹啉对耐药结核病的影响。高剂量组与低剂量组在6个月痰涂片阴性、腔体闭合时间、病变吸收复位时间上无显著差异。然而,与低剂量组(29.75%)相比,高剂量组的不良事件发生率(47.47%)更高,以骨髓抑制、周围神经病变和视神经炎为主。值得注意的是,高剂量组因不良事件需要调整剂量的患者比例(74.47%)明显高于低剂量组(50%,P=0.021)。结论:初始每日利奈唑胺600 mg和1200 mg联合贝达喹啉治疗耐药肺结核疗效相当。较低剂量显示耐受性改善。对于上述治疗,我们建议每日服用600毫克的利奈唑胺。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Chemotherapy
Chemotherapy 医学-药学
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
34
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: This journal publishes original research articles and state-of-the-art reviews on all aspects of antimicrobial and antitumor chemotherapy. The results of experimental and clinical investigations into the microbiological and pharmacologic properties of antibacterial, antiviral and antitumor compounds are major topics of publication. Papers selected for the journal offer data concerning the efficacy, toxicology, and interactions of new drugs in single or combined applications. Studies designed to determine the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamics properties of similar preparations and comparing their efficacy are also included. Special emphasis is given to the development of drug-resistance, an increasing problem worldwide.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书