Relative Impact of Multidomain Lifestyle Interventions on Deficit Accumulation Frailty Over 24 Months in the U.S. POINTER Trial.

Mark A Espeland,KayLoni Olson,Christy C Tangney,Darren R Gitelman,MaryJo Cleveland,Amber A Thro,Yitbarek N Demesie,Heather M Snyder,Rachel A Whitmer,Pankaja Desai,Rifat Alam,Lucia Crivelli,Thomas M Holland,Olivia Preissle,Rema Raman,Michele K York,Laura D Baker,
{"title":"Relative Impact of Multidomain Lifestyle Interventions on Deficit Accumulation Frailty Over 24 Months in the U.S. POINTER Trial.","authors":"Mark A Espeland,KayLoni Olson,Christy C Tangney,Darren R Gitelman,MaryJo Cleveland,Amber A Thro,Yitbarek N Demesie,Heather M Snyder,Rachel A Whitmer,Pankaja Desai,Rifat Alam,Lucia Crivelli,Thomas M Holland,Olivia Preissle,Rema Raman,Michele K York,Laura D Baker, ","doi":"10.1093/gerona/glag094","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND\r\nMultidomain lifestyle interventions hold promise as approaches to slow aging. Deficit accumulation frailty indices (FIs) are increasingly used to capture aging processes. Frailty is highly associated with increased mortality and chronic disease risk but the degree to which multidomain lifestyle changes impact frailty is not clear.\r\n\r\nMETHODS\r\nThe U.S. Study to Protect Brain Health through Lifestyle Intervention to Reduce Risk (U.S. POINTER) was a 2-year randomized clinical trial to compare two multidomain lifestyle interventions designed to increase exercise, improve diet, and promote social and cognitive stimulating activities and health monitoring. The Structured intervention incorporated greater structure, intensity, and accountability than the Self-Guided intervention. A modified FI (mFI) was developed from data collected at baseline, 12, and 24 months.\r\n\r\nRESULTS\r\nThe trial enrolled 2,111 adults (ages 60-79 years) who were at increased risk for accelerated cognitive decline. At 24 months, the mean (standard error) changes from baseline of a 31-component mFI were -0.009 (0.002) for Self-Guided and -0.024 (0.002) for Structured participants, a difference averaging -0.014 [-0.019, -0.008] (p < 0.0001). Group differences were similar across subgroups based on age, sex, body mass index, diabetes, and baseline mFI. Changes in mFI did not account for the relative cognitive benefits provided by the Structured intervention compared to the Self-Guided intervention.\r\n\r\nCONCLUSIONS\r\nMultidomain lifestyle interventions may decrease frailty and slow aging processes with greater structure and intensity resulting in greater benefits.\r\n\r\nCLINICALTRIALS.GOV IDENTIFIER\r\nClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03688126.","PeriodicalId":22892,"journal":{"name":"The Journals of Gerontology Series A: Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences","volume":"18 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journals of Gerontology Series A: Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/gerona/glag094","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

BACKGROUND Multidomain lifestyle interventions hold promise as approaches to slow aging. Deficit accumulation frailty indices (FIs) are increasingly used to capture aging processes. Frailty is highly associated with increased mortality and chronic disease risk but the degree to which multidomain lifestyle changes impact frailty is not clear. METHODS The U.S. Study to Protect Brain Health through Lifestyle Intervention to Reduce Risk (U.S. POINTER) was a 2-year randomized clinical trial to compare two multidomain lifestyle interventions designed to increase exercise, improve diet, and promote social and cognitive stimulating activities and health monitoring. The Structured intervention incorporated greater structure, intensity, and accountability than the Self-Guided intervention. A modified FI (mFI) was developed from data collected at baseline, 12, and 24 months. RESULTS The trial enrolled 2,111 adults (ages 60-79 years) who were at increased risk for accelerated cognitive decline. At 24 months, the mean (standard error) changes from baseline of a 31-component mFI were -0.009 (0.002) for Self-Guided and -0.024 (0.002) for Structured participants, a difference averaging -0.014 [-0.019, -0.008] (p < 0.0001). Group differences were similar across subgroups based on age, sex, body mass index, diabetes, and baseline mFI. Changes in mFI did not account for the relative cognitive benefits provided by the Structured intervention compared to the Self-Guided intervention. CONCLUSIONS Multidomain lifestyle interventions may decrease frailty and slow aging processes with greater structure and intensity resulting in greater benefits. CLINICALTRIALS.GOV IDENTIFIER ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03688126.
在美国POINTER试验中,多领域生活方式干预对24个月赤字积累虚弱的相对影响。
背景:多领域生活方式干预有望成为延缓衰老的方法。缺陷积累脆弱指数(FIs)越来越多地用于捕捉老化过程。虚弱与死亡率和慢性病风险的增加高度相关,但多领域生活方式改变对虚弱的影响程度尚不清楚。方法美国通过生活方式干预保护大脑健康以降低风险的研究(U.S. POINTER)是一项为期2年的随机临床试验,比较两种多领域生活方式干预,旨在增加锻炼,改善饮食,促进社会和认知刺激活动以及健康监测。与自我引导干预相比,结构化干预包含了更大的结构、强度和责任。根据基线、12个月和24个月收集的数据制定了改良的FI (mFI)。结果该试验招募了2111名认知能力加速下降风险增加的成年人(60-79岁)。在24个月时,自我引导参与者的31项mFI的平均(标准误差)变化为-0.009(0.002),结构化参与者的平均(标准误差)变化为-0.024(0.002),差异平均为-0.014 [-0.019,-0.008](p < 0.0001)。基于年龄、性别、体重指数、糖尿病和基线mFI的亚组之间的组差异相似。与自我引导干预相比,mFI的变化并不能解释结构化干预所提供的相对认知益处。结论:多域生活方式干预可以减少虚弱和延缓衰老过程,且结构和强度更大,获益更大。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书