Plant-Derived Treatments for Monogenean Parasites in Farmed Fish: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

IF 13.8 1区 农林科学 Q1 FISHERIES
Francisco Neptalí Morales-Serna
{"title":"Plant-Derived Treatments for Monogenean Parasites in Farmed Fish: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis","authors":"Francisco Neptalí Morales-Serna","doi":"10.1111/raq.70152","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Monogeneans are among the most problematic ectoparasites in finfish aquaculture. Plant-derived compounds have been widely explored as therapeutic agents, yet their efficacy and safety have not been quantitatively synthesized across studies. This study provides a meta-analysis of plant-based treatments against monogeneans, integrating 453 in vitro and 262 in vivo treatment comparisons from 50 publications. Random-effects and multilevel models were used to estimate pooled efficacy, assess heterogeneity, and evaluate patterns across compound types, concentration categories, and exposure durations. Safety was assessed using therapeutic indices or margins of safety derived from acute-toxicity endpoints. Most studies focused on dactylogyrids and gyrodactylids infecting two freshwater fish species. Plant-derived treatments produced consistently strong antiparasitic activity in vitro and in vivo (overall parasite-load reduction ~75%–80%), although with substantial methodological heterogeneity. Isolated compounds were the only group achieving high mortality at low concentrations and short exposures, whereas crude extracts and essential oils generally required higher concentrations or longer treatments. Safety outcomes showed no consistent relationship with concentration, and only 18% of treatments achieved complete parasite elimination while remaining safe for fish. Notably, some studies recommended treatment regimens even when their results did not clearly support strong therapeutic performance, highlighting the need for more explicit standards for defining effective and safe therapies. Overall, plant-derived compounds show promise for managing monogenean infections, but strong efficacy does not guarantee practical or safe application. Integrating in silico approaches, combining ligand-based screening with parasite-specific molecular targets, offers a promising route to prioritize candidates with genuine therapeutic potential in aquaculture.</p>","PeriodicalId":227,"journal":{"name":"Reviews in Aquaculture","volume":"18 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":13.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/raq.70152","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Reviews in Aquaculture","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/raq.70152","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"FISHERIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Monogeneans are among the most problematic ectoparasites in finfish aquaculture. Plant-derived compounds have been widely explored as therapeutic agents, yet their efficacy and safety have not been quantitatively synthesized across studies. This study provides a meta-analysis of plant-based treatments against monogeneans, integrating 453 in vitro and 262 in vivo treatment comparisons from 50 publications. Random-effects and multilevel models were used to estimate pooled efficacy, assess heterogeneity, and evaluate patterns across compound types, concentration categories, and exposure durations. Safety was assessed using therapeutic indices or margins of safety derived from acute-toxicity endpoints. Most studies focused on dactylogyrids and gyrodactylids infecting two freshwater fish species. Plant-derived treatments produced consistently strong antiparasitic activity in vitro and in vivo (overall parasite-load reduction ~75%–80%), although with substantial methodological heterogeneity. Isolated compounds were the only group achieving high mortality at low concentrations and short exposures, whereas crude extracts and essential oils generally required higher concentrations or longer treatments. Safety outcomes showed no consistent relationship with concentration, and only 18% of treatments achieved complete parasite elimination while remaining safe for fish. Notably, some studies recommended treatment regimens even when their results did not clearly support strong therapeutic performance, highlighting the need for more explicit standards for defining effective and safe therapies. Overall, plant-derived compounds show promise for managing monogenean infections, but strong efficacy does not guarantee practical or safe application. Integrating in silico approaches, combining ligand-based screening with parasite-specific molecular targets, offers a promising route to prioritize candidates with genuine therapeutic potential in aquaculture.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

养殖鱼类单系寄生虫的植物源处理:系统综述和Meta分析
单系寄生虫是鱼类养殖中最具问题的体外寄生虫之一。植物衍生化合物作为治疗药物已被广泛探索,但其有效性和安全性尚未在研究中定量合成。本研究提供了一项基于植物的单基因治疗的荟萃分析,整合了来自50篇出版物的453个体外和262个体内治疗比较。随机效应和多水平模型用于估计综合疗效,评估异质性,并评估化合物类型、浓度类别和暴露持续时间的模式。安全性评估采用急性毒性终点衍生的治疗指标或安全边际。大多数研究集中在感染两种淡水鱼的趾状虫和回肠虫。植物源性处理在体内和体外均具有较强的抗寄生活性(总体寄生虫负荷降低约75%-80%),尽管方法上存在很大的异质性。分离化合物是唯一一组在低浓度和短时间接触下达到高死亡率的化合物,而粗提取物和精油通常需要更高的浓度或更长时间的处理。安全性结果显示与浓度没有一致的关系,只有18%的处理在保证鱼类安全的情况下完全消除了寄生虫。值得注意的是,一些研究推荐的治疗方案,即使他们的结果并没有明确支持强有力的治疗效果,强调需要更明确的标准来定义有效和安全的治疗方法。总的来说,植物衍生化合物显示出控制单基因感染的希望,但强大的功效并不能保证实际或安全的应用。整合计算机方法,将基于配体的筛选与寄生虫特异性分子靶点相结合,为在水产养殖中优先考虑具有真正治疗潜力的候选物提供了一条有希望的途径。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
24.80
自引率
5.80%
发文量
109
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Reviews in Aquaculture is a journal that aims to provide a platform for reviews on various aspects of aquaculture science, techniques, policies, and planning. The journal publishes fully peer-reviewed review articles on topics including global, regional, and national production and market trends in aquaculture, advancements in aquaculture practices and technology, interactions between aquaculture and the environment, indigenous and alien species in aquaculture, genetics and its relation to aquaculture, as well as aquaculture product quality and traceability. The journal is indexed and abstracted in several databases including AgBiotech News & Information (CABI), AgBiotechNet, Agricultural Engineering Abstracts, Environment Index (EBSCO Publishing), SCOPUS (Elsevier), and Web of Science (Clarivate Analytics) among others.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书