Clarissa Garcia Custódio, Lilian Cristie de Oliveira, Laura Fernandes Berto, Bianca Besteti Fernandes Damiano, Juliane Piasseschi de Bernardin Gonçalves, Oscarina da Silva Ezequiel, Alessandra Lamas Granero Lucchetti, Lisabeth F DiLalla, Homero Vallada, Euripedes Constantino Miguel, Giancarlo Lucchetti, Rodolfo Furlan Damiano
{"title":"Learning Environment, Academic Stressors, and Institutional Aspects as Determinants of Mental Health Outcomes in Medical Education.","authors":"Clarissa Garcia Custódio, Lilian Cristie de Oliveira, Laura Fernandes Berto, Bianca Besteti Fernandes Damiano, Juliane Piasseschi de Bernardin Gonçalves, Oscarina da Silva Ezequiel, Alessandra Lamas Granero Lucchetti, Lisabeth F DiLalla, Homero Vallada, Euripedes Constantino Miguel, Giancarlo Lucchetti, Rodolfo Furlan Damiano","doi":"10.47626/1516-4446-2025-4509","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Examine associations between learning environment, academic stressors, and mental health among Brazilian medical students across different institutional contexts.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Cross-sectional study of 1,026 medical students from 74 public and private universities. Participants completed the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9), Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 (GAD-7), Johns Hopkins Learning Environment Scale (JHLES), and Medical Student Stressor Factor Scale (MSSF). Analyses included group comparisons, multiple regression, random forest modeling, and latent class analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Private university students reported significantly better learning environments than public university counterparts (M = 84.6 vs. 81.9, p < 0.001). Quota students, those admitted to universities through affirmative action policies, demonstrated higher depression scores (M = 14.2 vs. 12.8, p = 0.007) and academic stress levels (M = 134.0 vs. 129.1, p = 0.018). Academic stressors demonstrated significant associations with both depressive (β=0.103; p<0.001) and anxiety symptoms (β=0.103; p<0.001), while higher learning environment quality was associated with lower depressive symptom severity (β=-0.105; p=0.043). Latent classes identified high-risk (53.7%), moderate-distress (32.7%), and high-functioning (13.6%) profiles, with affirmative-action students overrepresented in higher-risk classes.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Students admitted via affirmative action in public universities face compounded vulnerabilities. Interventions should focus on reducing academic stress and improving learning environments, especially in public institutions serving disadvantaged groups.</p>","PeriodicalId":520767,"journal":{"name":"Revista brasileira de psiquiatria (Sao Paulo, Brazil : 1999)","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista brasileira de psiquiatria (Sao Paulo, Brazil : 1999)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47626/1516-4446-2025-4509","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: Examine associations between learning environment, academic stressors, and mental health among Brazilian medical students across different institutional contexts.
Methods: Cross-sectional study of 1,026 medical students from 74 public and private universities. Participants completed the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9), Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 (GAD-7), Johns Hopkins Learning Environment Scale (JHLES), and Medical Student Stressor Factor Scale (MSSF). Analyses included group comparisons, multiple regression, random forest modeling, and latent class analysis.
Results: Private university students reported significantly better learning environments than public university counterparts (M = 84.6 vs. 81.9, p < 0.001). Quota students, those admitted to universities through affirmative action policies, demonstrated higher depression scores (M = 14.2 vs. 12.8, p = 0.007) and academic stress levels (M = 134.0 vs. 129.1, p = 0.018). Academic stressors demonstrated significant associations with both depressive (β=0.103; p<0.001) and anxiety symptoms (β=0.103; p<0.001), while higher learning environment quality was associated with lower depressive symptom severity (β=-0.105; p=0.043). Latent classes identified high-risk (53.7%), moderate-distress (32.7%), and high-functioning (13.6%) profiles, with affirmative-action students overrepresented in higher-risk classes.
Conclusion: Students admitted via affirmative action in public universities face compounded vulnerabilities. Interventions should focus on reducing academic stress and improving learning environments, especially in public institutions serving disadvantaged groups.