Long Term Outcomes of Non-Surgical Treatment of Peri-Implantitis: A Retrospective Case Series.

IF 1.7
Andreas O Parashis, Binnaz Leblebicioglu, Dimitris N Tatakis
{"title":"Long Term Outcomes of Non-Surgical Treatment of Peri-Implantitis: A Retrospective Case Series.","authors":"Andreas O Parashis, Binnaz Leblebicioglu, Dimitris N Tatakis","doi":"10.11607/jomi.11688","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>bjective: Conventional non-surgical techniques are considered ineffective for peri-implantitis management. The aim of this retrospective case series is to present the long-term results of a non-surgical protocol for peri-implantitis treatment, in a private practice setting.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Peri-implantitis diagnosis criteria were presence of bleeding on probing with or without suppuration, probing pocket depth (PD) > 5 mm and interproximal radiographic bone loss (IBL)>2mm on a non-mobile implant. The treatment protocol included oral hygiene instruction, thorough implant instrumentation with ultrasonic tips and rotating titanium brushes, meticulous removal of granulation tissue, local or systemic antibiotics, possible prosthesis modification, long-term use of antimicrobials, and individualized supportive care. Clinical and radiographic parameters were recorded at initial visit and last follow-up.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-six patients (30 implants) were included. Mean follow-up time was 86.1 months (range: 18-180 months). During follow-up, the protocol was repeated once in 10 implants and twice in another 10 implants. Four implants were explanted due to significant progressive bone loss. The remaining 26 stable/improved implants showed significant mean PD reduction (3.5 mm) and mean radiographic bone gain (1.9 mm), without PD>5 mm or further bone loss >0.5mm, resulting in 86.7% survival rate.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The presented non-surgical protocol provided stable long-term clinical and radiographic outcomes, demonstrating the possibility of maintaining dental implants treated for peri-implantitis in a practice setting. Retreatment over the years was necessary to achieve these results.</p>","PeriodicalId":94230,"journal":{"name":"The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants","volume":"0 0","pages":"1-25"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11607/jomi.11688","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

bjective: Conventional non-surgical techniques are considered ineffective for peri-implantitis management. The aim of this retrospective case series is to present the long-term results of a non-surgical protocol for peri-implantitis treatment, in a private practice setting.

Materials and methods: Peri-implantitis diagnosis criteria were presence of bleeding on probing with or without suppuration, probing pocket depth (PD) > 5 mm and interproximal radiographic bone loss (IBL)>2mm on a non-mobile implant. The treatment protocol included oral hygiene instruction, thorough implant instrumentation with ultrasonic tips and rotating titanium brushes, meticulous removal of granulation tissue, local or systemic antibiotics, possible prosthesis modification, long-term use of antimicrobials, and individualized supportive care. Clinical and radiographic parameters were recorded at initial visit and last follow-up.

Results: Twenty-six patients (30 implants) were included. Mean follow-up time was 86.1 months (range: 18-180 months). During follow-up, the protocol was repeated once in 10 implants and twice in another 10 implants. Four implants were explanted due to significant progressive bone loss. The remaining 26 stable/improved implants showed significant mean PD reduction (3.5 mm) and mean radiographic bone gain (1.9 mm), without PD>5 mm or further bone loss >0.5mm, resulting in 86.7% survival rate.

Conclusions: The presented non-surgical protocol provided stable long-term clinical and radiographic outcomes, demonstrating the possibility of maintaining dental implants treated for peri-implantitis in a practice setting. Retreatment over the years was necessary to achieve these results.

非手术治疗种植体周围炎的远期疗效:回顾性病例系列。
目的:传统的非手术技术被认为对种植体周围炎的治疗无效。本回顾性病例系列的目的是在私人实践环境中,介绍种植体周围炎治疗的非手术方案的长期结果。材料和方法:种植体周围炎的诊断标准是在不可移动的种植体上探测时出血,伴有或不伴有化脓,探测袋深度(PD) > ~ 5mm,近端放射学骨质流失(IBL)> ~ 2mm。治疗方案包括口腔卫生指导,使用超声尖端和旋转钛刷进行全面的种植器械检查,细致地去除肉芽组织,局部或全身抗生素,可能的假体修饰,长期使用抗菌药物,以及个性化的支持治疗。记录初诊和末次随访时的临床和影像学参数。结果:纳入26例患者(30颗种植体)。平均随访时间86.1个月(18 ~ 180个月)。在随访期间,该方案在10个种植体中重复一次,在另外10个种植体中重复两次。由于严重的进行性骨质流失,4个种植体被移出。其余26个稳定/改进的种植体显示显着的平均PD降低(3.5 mm)和平均x线骨增加(1.9 mm),无PD>5 mm或进一步骨损失>0.5mm,生存率为86.7%。结论:提出的非手术方案提供了稳定的长期临床和影像学结果,证明了在实践环境中维持种植体治疗种植体周围炎的可能性。为了达到这些结果,多年的再治疗是必要的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书