Efficacy of Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection for Superficial Esophageal Cancer on the Distal Side of Esophageal Strictures Using a Novel Thin Therapeutic Endoscope
{"title":"Efficacy of Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection for Superficial Esophageal Cancer on the Distal Side of Esophageal Strictures Using a Novel Thin Therapeutic Endoscope","authors":"Erika Uchida, Keiichiro Nakajo, Hiroki Yamashita, Atsushi Inaba, Hironori Sunakawa, Tomohiro Kadota, Kensuke Shinmura, Tomonori Yano","doi":"10.1002/deo2.70300","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objectives</h3>\n \n <p>Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) for esophageal squamous cell carcinomas (ESCCs) localized on the distal side of strictures requires dilation to pass a conventional endoscope. While an ultra-slim endoscope can pass without dilation, ESD using it remains clinically challenging. Despite its small outer diameter of only 7.9 mm, the EG-840TP features a 3.2-mm working channel, an auxiliary water channel, and 160° downward angulation capability. We evaluated the efficacy and safety of ESD using the EG-840TP for ESCCs localized on the distal side of strictures.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>This retrospective study included patients who underwent ESD for ESCCs localized on the distal side of strictures that a conventional endoscope (diameter ≥8.9 mm) could not pass at our institute from December 2015 to November 2024. Patients were categorized into novel thin endoscope (the EG-840TP) and conventional endoscope (treated after stricture dilation) groups. Patients with strictures narrower than 6 mm were excluded.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Of 28 patients (36 lesions), 13 patients (19 lesions) underwent ESD using the novel thin endoscope, whereas 15 patients (17 lesions) underwent ESD using the conventional endoscope. The treatment speed was significantly faster in the novel thin endoscope group (4.91 mm<sup>2</sup>/min vs. 1.63 mm<sup>2</sup>/min, <i>p</i> = 0.03). No serious adverse events were observed in either group.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>ESD using the EG-840TP demonstrated superior efficacy for superficial ESCCs located on the distal side of strictures, offering an alternative to dilation-based approaches.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":93973,"journal":{"name":"DEN open","volume":"6 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13052298/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"DEN open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/deo2.70300","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objectives
Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) for esophageal squamous cell carcinomas (ESCCs) localized on the distal side of strictures requires dilation to pass a conventional endoscope. While an ultra-slim endoscope can pass without dilation, ESD using it remains clinically challenging. Despite its small outer diameter of only 7.9 mm, the EG-840TP features a 3.2-mm working channel, an auxiliary water channel, and 160° downward angulation capability. We evaluated the efficacy and safety of ESD using the EG-840TP for ESCCs localized on the distal side of strictures.
Methods
This retrospective study included patients who underwent ESD for ESCCs localized on the distal side of strictures that a conventional endoscope (diameter ≥8.9 mm) could not pass at our institute from December 2015 to November 2024. Patients were categorized into novel thin endoscope (the EG-840TP) and conventional endoscope (treated after stricture dilation) groups. Patients with strictures narrower than 6 mm were excluded.
Results
Of 28 patients (36 lesions), 13 patients (19 lesions) underwent ESD using the novel thin endoscope, whereas 15 patients (17 lesions) underwent ESD using the conventional endoscope. The treatment speed was significantly faster in the novel thin endoscope group (4.91 mm2/min vs. 1.63 mm2/min, p = 0.03). No serious adverse events were observed in either group.
Conclusions
ESD using the EG-840TP demonstrated superior efficacy for superficial ESCCs located on the distal side of strictures, offering an alternative to dilation-based approaches.
目的:内镜下粘膜下剥离(ESD)用于食管鳞状细胞癌(escc)的狭窄远端,需要扩张才能通过常规内窥镜。虽然超薄内窥镜可以在不扩张的情况下通过,但使用ESD在临床上仍然具有挑战性。尽管其外径只有7.9毫米,但EG-840TP具有3.2毫米的工作通道,辅助水道和160°向下倾斜的能力。我们使用EG-840TP评估ESD治疗狭窄远端escc的有效性和安全性。方法:本回顾性研究纳入2015年12月至2024年11月在我院接受ESD治疗的狭窄远端escc患者,常规内窥镜(直径≥8.9 mm)无法通过。将患者分为新型薄内窥镜组(EG-840TP)和常规内窥镜组(狭窄扩张后治疗)。狭窄小于6mm的患者排除。结果:28例患者(36个病变)中,13例患者(19个病变)采用新型薄内窥镜行ESD, 15例患者(17个病变)采用常规内窥镜行ESD。新型薄内窥镜组治疗速度明显更快(4.91 mm2/min vs. 1.63 mm2/min, p = 0.03)。两组均未见严重不良事件发生。结论:使用EG-840TP的ESD对位于狭窄远侧的浅表escc表现出优越的疗效,为扩张入路提供了另一种选择。