{"title":"Layered Radial Aquifer Model for Open-Pit Mine Closure with Managed Aquifer Recharge.","authors":"Behzad Ataie Ashtiani","doi":"10.1111/gwat.70065","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Open-pit mine dewatering can delay post-closure pit-lake recovery and is increasingly managed using managed aquifer recharge (MAR). We develop a radially symmetric two-aquifer model that couples an unconfined aquifer, a leaky aquitard, and an underlying confined aquifer to a pit water-balance equation, extending Cook et al. (2022) to layered systems. MAR is represented by reinjecting prescribed fractions of the time-varying pumping rate at a ring radius r<sub>1</sub>, with flexible allocation between unconfined and confined injection. Nondimensionalization yields transferable type curves and a design workflow controlled by K<sub>u</sub>/S<sub>y</sub>, Kc/Sc, Λ/S<sub>c</sub>, r<sub>1</sub>/r<sub>0</sub>, and the far-field head ratio α. We evaluate 15 hydrogeologic scenarios (H0-H14) under three MAR allocations (no MAR, MAR<sub>u80</sub>, MAR<sub>split</sub>). Across scenarios, reinjecting 80% of pumped water to the unconfined aquifer (MAR<sub>u80</sub>) reduces the time for the pit water level to return within 5 m of the pre-mining unconfined head from 21-48 year (no MAR) to 1.8-28 year, with a median recovery-time ratio of 0.17, while increasing mean pumping by a median factor of 1.31. Splitting the same reinjection fraction between unconfined and confined aquifers can further shorten recovery when vertical coupling is moderate to high (Λ/S<sub>c</sub> ≳1), but increases mounding and recycling. Layering matters: for the same MAR policy, the layered base case predicts recovery times a factor of ~2-3 shorter than the homogeneous limit. The results provide screening guidance on when confined-aquifer injection can accelerate recovery without unacceptable unconfined mounding.</p>","PeriodicalId":94022,"journal":{"name":"Ground water","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ground water","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/gwat.70065","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Open-pit mine dewatering can delay post-closure pit-lake recovery and is increasingly managed using managed aquifer recharge (MAR). We develop a radially symmetric two-aquifer model that couples an unconfined aquifer, a leaky aquitard, and an underlying confined aquifer to a pit water-balance equation, extending Cook et al. (2022) to layered systems. MAR is represented by reinjecting prescribed fractions of the time-varying pumping rate at a ring radius r1, with flexible allocation between unconfined and confined injection. Nondimensionalization yields transferable type curves and a design workflow controlled by Ku/Sy, Kc/Sc, Λ/Sc, r1/r0, and the far-field head ratio α. We evaluate 15 hydrogeologic scenarios (H0-H14) under three MAR allocations (no MAR, MARu80, MARsplit). Across scenarios, reinjecting 80% of pumped water to the unconfined aquifer (MARu80) reduces the time for the pit water level to return within 5 m of the pre-mining unconfined head from 21-48 year (no MAR) to 1.8-28 year, with a median recovery-time ratio of 0.17, while increasing mean pumping by a median factor of 1.31. Splitting the same reinjection fraction between unconfined and confined aquifers can further shorten recovery when vertical coupling is moderate to high (Λ/Sc ≳1), but increases mounding and recycling. Layering matters: for the same MAR policy, the layered base case predicts recovery times a factor of ~2-3 shorter than the homogeneous limit. The results provide screening guidance on when confined-aquifer injection can accelerate recovery without unacceptable unconfined mounding.
露天矿脱水会延迟闭坑后的坑湖恢复,并且越来越多地采用有管理含水层补给(MAR)进行管理。我们开发了一个径向对称的双含水层模型,将无承压含水层、泄漏含水层和潜在的承压含水层耦合到一个坑水平衡方程中,将Cook等人(2022)扩展到分层系统。MAR表示为在环半径r1处重新注入时变泵速的规定分数,并在无侧限和侧限之间灵活分配。无量纲化产生可转移的类型曲线和由Ku/Sy、Kc/Sc、Λ/Sc、r1/r0和远场水头比α控制的设计工作流。我们在3种MAR分配(no MAR, MARu80, MARsplit)下评估了15种水文地质情景(H0-H14)。在不同的方案中,将80%的抽水回注到无承压含水层(MARu80),将开采前无承压水头5 m内的坑水位恢复时间从21-48年(无MAR)减少到1.8-28年,恢复时间比中位数为0.17,而平均抽水增加的中位数系数为1.31。当垂直耦合中高(Λ/Sc≤1)时,在非承压含水层和承压含水层之间划分相同的回注分数可以进一步缩短采收率,但会增加堆积和循环。分层很重要:对于相同的MAR策略,分层基本情况预测的恢复时间比均匀限制短2-3倍。研究结果为在没有不可接受的无侧限堆积的情况下注入承压含水层加速采收率提供了筛选指导。