Long-term and short-term outcomes of curative-intent resection for elderly and younger patients with gallbladder carcinoma: a multicentre propensity score-matched cohort study.

IF 10.5
eGastroenterology Pub Date : 2026-03-31 eCollection Date: 2026-01-01 DOI:10.1136/egastro-2025-100323
Yu Pan, Chun-Yue Ye, Peng Zhao, Hai-Su Dai, Yan Jiang, Yu-Cheng Huang, Cheng Chen, Yu-Le Luo, Jun-Jie Ding, Rui Ding, Ping Yue, Fan Huang, Chao Yu, Zhao-Ping Wu, Wei Chen, Jin-Xue Zhou, Wei Guo, Da-Long Yin, Wei Chen, Yi Zhu, Jie Bai, Yan-Qi Zhang, Dong Zhang, Ya-Yun Wang, Yan-Ling Yang, Zhi-Peng Liu, Rui Guo, Zhi-Yu Chen
{"title":"Long-term and short-term outcomes of curative-intent resection for elderly and younger patients with gallbladder carcinoma: a multicentre propensity score-matched cohort study.","authors":"Yu Pan, Chun-Yue Ye, Peng Zhao, Hai-Su Dai, Yan Jiang, Yu-Cheng Huang, Cheng Chen, Yu-Le Luo, Jun-Jie Ding, Rui Ding, Ping Yue, Fan Huang, Chao Yu, Zhao-Ping Wu, Wei Chen, Jin-Xue Zhou, Wei Guo, Da-Long Yin, Wei Chen, Yi Zhu, Jie Bai, Yan-Qi Zhang, Dong Zhang, Ya-Yun Wang, Yan-Ling Yang, Zhi-Peng Liu, Rui Guo, Zhi-Yu Chen","doi":"10.1136/egastro-2025-100323","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>While curative-intent resection for gallbladder cancer (GBC) is being increasingly performed in elderly patients, perioperative morbidity and long-term oncological outcomes in this population remain unclear.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Consecutive patients with GBC who underwent curative-intent resection (2016-2020) were identified from a multicentre database and stratified as elderly (>70 years) or younger (≤70 years). Propensity score matching (PSM) and inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) were used to minimise selection bias. The outcomes compared included overall survival (OS), cancer-specific survival (CSS) and short-term outcomes. Logistic regression was used to identify risk factors for major morbidity and Cox regression was used for CSS, with the Fine-Gray competing risk model further applied to account for non-cancer-related death in the analysis of CSS.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among the 575 patients enrolled, 432 were younger and 143 were elderly. After 1:1 PSM and IPTW, elderly patients had significantly higher 90-day major morbidity rates than younger patients (p=0.029 and p=0.010, respectively), but also demonstrated better CSS in both cohorts (p=0.038 and p<0.001, respectively). OS was significantly longer in elderly patients only after PSM (p<0.001), with no significant difference after IPTW (p=0.684). Multi-adjusted analysis confirmed that advanced age was an independent risk factor for major morbidities (original cohort: OR 1.71 (95% CI 1.12 to 2.59); PSM: OR 1.88 (95% CI 1.08 to 3.30); IPTW: OR 1.83 (95% CI 1.17 to 2.82)) but was associated with longer CSS (original cohort: HR 0.65 (95% CI 0.44 to 0.97); PSM: HR 0.29 (95% CI 0.18 to 0.45); IPTW: HR 0.62 (95% CI 0.42 to 0.90); Fine-Gray model: HR 0.34 (95% CI 0.30 to 0.39)).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Despite a higher risk of major postoperative morbidity, advanced age itself might not be considered a contraindication for curative-intent resection. Selected elderly patients with GBC may achieve superior CSS compared to their younger counterparts.</p>","PeriodicalId":72879,"journal":{"name":"eGastroenterology","volume":"4 1","pages":"e100323"},"PeriodicalIF":10.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13052777/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"eGastroenterology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/egastro-2025-100323","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: While curative-intent resection for gallbladder cancer (GBC) is being increasingly performed in elderly patients, perioperative morbidity and long-term oncological outcomes in this population remain unclear.

Methods: Consecutive patients with GBC who underwent curative-intent resection (2016-2020) were identified from a multicentre database and stratified as elderly (>70 years) or younger (≤70 years). Propensity score matching (PSM) and inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) were used to minimise selection bias. The outcomes compared included overall survival (OS), cancer-specific survival (CSS) and short-term outcomes. Logistic regression was used to identify risk factors for major morbidity and Cox regression was used for CSS, with the Fine-Gray competing risk model further applied to account for non-cancer-related death in the analysis of CSS.

Results: Among the 575 patients enrolled, 432 were younger and 143 were elderly. After 1:1 PSM and IPTW, elderly patients had significantly higher 90-day major morbidity rates than younger patients (p=0.029 and p=0.010, respectively), but also demonstrated better CSS in both cohorts (p=0.038 and p<0.001, respectively). OS was significantly longer in elderly patients only after PSM (p<0.001), with no significant difference after IPTW (p=0.684). Multi-adjusted analysis confirmed that advanced age was an independent risk factor for major morbidities (original cohort: OR 1.71 (95% CI 1.12 to 2.59); PSM: OR 1.88 (95% CI 1.08 to 3.30); IPTW: OR 1.83 (95% CI 1.17 to 2.82)) but was associated with longer CSS (original cohort: HR 0.65 (95% CI 0.44 to 0.97); PSM: HR 0.29 (95% CI 0.18 to 0.45); IPTW: HR 0.62 (95% CI 0.42 to 0.90); Fine-Gray model: HR 0.34 (95% CI 0.30 to 0.39)).

Conclusion: Despite a higher risk of major postoperative morbidity, advanced age itself might not be considered a contraindication for curative-intent resection. Selected elderly patients with GBC may achieve superior CSS compared to their younger counterparts.

老年和年轻胆囊癌患者治疗目的切除的长期和短期结果:一项多中心倾向评分匹配队列研究
背景:虽然胆囊癌(GBC)的治疗目的切除术越来越多地应用于老年患者,但这一人群的围手术期发病率和长期肿瘤预后仍不清楚。方法:从多中心数据库中确定连续接受治愈性切除(2016-2020)的GBC患者,并将其分层为老年(70岁以下)或年轻(≤70岁)。使用倾向评分匹配(PSM)和处理加权逆概率(IPTW)来最小化选择偏差。比较的结果包括总生存期(OS)、癌症特异性生存期(CSS)和短期结果。使用Logistic回归确定主要发病的危险因素,使用Cox回归分析CSS,并进一步应用Fine-Gray竞争风险模型来解释CSS分析中的非癌症相关死亡。结果:入组的575例患者中,432例为年轻人,143例为老年人。在1:1 PSM和IPTW后,老年患者的90天主要发病率明显高于年轻患者(分别为p=0.029和p=0.010),但在两组患者中也表现出更好的CSS (p=0.038和p)。结论:尽管术后主要发病率风险较高,高龄本身可能不是治疗目的切除的禁忌症。与年轻的GBC患者相比,选择的老年GBC患者可能获得更好的CSS。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书