360° Contextual Simulation Video for Undergraduate Nursing Students: An Electroencephalography-Based Quasi-Experimental Study.

IF 4
JMIR nursing Pub Date : 2026-04-07 DOI:10.2196/84720
Yi-Chang Chen, Chen-Jung Chen
{"title":"360° Contextual Simulation Video for Undergraduate Nursing Students: An Electroencephalography-Based Quasi-Experimental Study.","authors":"Yi-Chang Chen, Chen-Jung Chen","doi":"10.2196/84720","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Unstructured: </strong>Background: Screen-based 360° contextual simulation videos are being increasingly used in nursing education; however, evidence regarding their effects on learning outcomes and neural Electroencephalography (EEG) patterns remains limited. Objectives: To evaluate whether integrating 360° contextual simulation videos with traditional classroom instruction influences nursing students' perceptions of simulation design and educational practices, their levels of satisfaction and self-confidence in learning, and EEG-based neural correlates of action observation. Methods: In a quasi-experiment, 55 third-year nursing students (experimental n=28; control n=27) were assigned to 360° contextual simulation video learning (laptop; no head-mounted display) or traditional classroom-based instruction (didactic instruction, guided discussion, and 2D instructional videos). The primary outcomes were Simulation Design Scale (SDS) and Educational Practices Questionnaire (EPQ) scores. Secondary outcomes included Student Satisfaction and Self-Confidence in Learning Scale (SCLS) scores satisfaction and self-confidence) and EEG indices (power at C3, Cz, and C4; μ-rhythm suppression scores). Group differences were tested with t tests and ANCOVA adjusted for baseline values. Results: Between-group analyses (ANCOVA adjusted for baseline values) revealed higher posttest scores on the Simulation Design Scale (SDS; F(1,35)=7.80, P=.008; η²=.182), Educational Practices Questionnaire (EPQ; F(1,35)=6.00, P=.019; η²=.146), and Student Satisfaction and Self-Confidence in Learning Scale (SCLS; F(1,35)=7.01, P=.012; η²=.167) in the experimental group than the control group. Within-group analyses (paired t tests) indicated significant increases in SDS and EPQ scores for the experimental group (P<.001 and P=.005), whereas the control group showed a decrease in the SDS score (P=.001) and no significant change in the EPQ score (P=.106). The SCLS score did not significantly change in the experimental group (P=.212) and increased in the control group (P=.043). EEG analyses revealed significant postexposure reductions in power at C3, Cz, and C4 for the experimental group (all P<.001), with between-group effects at Cz (F(1,35)=425.29, P<.001; η²=.926) and C4 (F(1,35)=5.45, P=.026; η²=.138). μ-Suppression, which is an indirect EEG correlate that is often reported during action observation, was greater in the experimental group at Cz (P=.028) and C4 (P=.033) but not at C3 (P=.125). No adverse events were reported. Conclusions: Integrating 360° contextual simulation videos into undergraduate nursing education was associated with higher SDS and EPQ scores and improved self-reported satisfaction and self-confidence, in addition to EEG-based findings that may reflect neural EEG patterns associated with action observation. Larger multisite randomized trials are warranted to confirm efficacy and cost-effectiveness. This study was registered at the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (No. ChiCTR2500102861).</p>","PeriodicalId":73556,"journal":{"name":"JMIR nursing","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JMIR nursing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2196/84720","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Unstructured: Background: Screen-based 360° contextual simulation videos are being increasingly used in nursing education; however, evidence regarding their effects on learning outcomes and neural Electroencephalography (EEG) patterns remains limited. Objectives: To evaluate whether integrating 360° contextual simulation videos with traditional classroom instruction influences nursing students' perceptions of simulation design and educational practices, their levels of satisfaction and self-confidence in learning, and EEG-based neural correlates of action observation. Methods: In a quasi-experiment, 55 third-year nursing students (experimental n=28; control n=27) were assigned to 360° contextual simulation video learning (laptop; no head-mounted display) or traditional classroom-based instruction (didactic instruction, guided discussion, and 2D instructional videos). The primary outcomes were Simulation Design Scale (SDS) and Educational Practices Questionnaire (EPQ) scores. Secondary outcomes included Student Satisfaction and Self-Confidence in Learning Scale (SCLS) scores satisfaction and self-confidence) and EEG indices (power at C3, Cz, and C4; μ-rhythm suppression scores). Group differences were tested with t tests and ANCOVA adjusted for baseline values. Results: Between-group analyses (ANCOVA adjusted for baseline values) revealed higher posttest scores on the Simulation Design Scale (SDS; F(1,35)=7.80, P=.008; η²=.182), Educational Practices Questionnaire (EPQ; F(1,35)=6.00, P=.019; η²=.146), and Student Satisfaction and Self-Confidence in Learning Scale (SCLS; F(1,35)=7.01, P=.012; η²=.167) in the experimental group than the control group. Within-group analyses (paired t tests) indicated significant increases in SDS and EPQ scores for the experimental group (P<.001 and P=.005), whereas the control group showed a decrease in the SDS score (P=.001) and no significant change in the EPQ score (P=.106). The SCLS score did not significantly change in the experimental group (P=.212) and increased in the control group (P=.043). EEG analyses revealed significant postexposure reductions in power at C3, Cz, and C4 for the experimental group (all P<.001), with between-group effects at Cz (F(1,35)=425.29, P<.001; η²=.926) and C4 (F(1,35)=5.45, P=.026; η²=.138). μ-Suppression, which is an indirect EEG correlate that is often reported during action observation, was greater in the experimental group at Cz (P=.028) and C4 (P=.033) but not at C3 (P=.125). No adverse events were reported. Conclusions: Integrating 360° contextual simulation videos into undergraduate nursing education was associated with higher SDS and EPQ scores and improved self-reported satisfaction and self-confidence, in addition to EEG-based findings that may reflect neural EEG patterns associated with action observation. Larger multisite randomized trials are warranted to confirm efficacy and cost-effectiveness. This study was registered at the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (No. ChiCTR2500102861).

护理本科生360°情境模拟视频:基于脑电图的准实验研究。
背景:基于屏幕的360°情境模拟视频越来越多地应用于护理教育;然而,关于它们对学习结果和神经脑电图(EEG)模式的影响的证据仍然有限。目的:评估将360°情境模拟视频与传统课堂教学相结合是否会影响护生对模拟设计和教育实践的认知、学习满意度和自信心,以及基于脑电图的动作观察神经关联。方法:在准实验中,55名三年级护理学生(实验n=28,对照组n=27)被分配到360°情境模拟视频学习(笔记本电脑,无头戴式显示器)或传统的课堂教学(说教式教学,引导讨论和2D教学视频)。主要结果为模拟设计量表(SDS)和教育实践问卷(EPQ)得分。次要结局包括学生学习满意度和自信心量表(SCLS)评分(满意度和自信心)和脑电图指标(C3、Cz和C4功率;μ节律抑制评分)。采用t检验和ANCOVA校正基线值检验组间差异。结果:组间分析(ANCOVA调整基线值)显示,模拟设计量表(SDS, F(1,35)=7.80, P= 0.008;η²= 0.182),教育实践问卷(EPQ; F(1,35)=6.00, P= 0.019;η²=.146),学生学习满意度与自信心量表(SCLS; F(1,35)=7.01, P=.012;η²=.167)。组内分析(配对t检验)显示,实验组的SDS和EPQ评分显著升高(P
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书