Care by Name, Not by Nature: Experiences of Older Adults Accessing a Home Care Package Including Food and Nutrition Services—An Exploratory Qualitative Study

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q4 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY
Caitlin Wyman, Victoria Hoekman, Michael Lawless, Jolene Thomas, Alison Yaxley
{"title":"Care by Name, Not by Nature: Experiences of Older Adults Accessing a Home Care Package Including Food and Nutrition Services—An Exploratory Qualitative Study","authors":"Caitlin Wyman,&nbsp;Victoria Hoekman,&nbsp;Michael Lawless,&nbsp;Jolene Thomas,&nbsp;Alison Yaxley","doi":"10.1111/ajag.70156","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objectives</h3>\n \n <p>To (1) explore the experiences and perceptions of older adults accessing an Australian Government Home Care Package (HCP), (2) understand how recipients prioritise their package expenditure, (3) understand the value that recipients place on food and nutrition services, and (4) understand the barriers and facilitators to spending on these services.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 15 HCP recipients aged 65 years or older located across Australia. Transcripts were analysed using Braun and Clarke's six-phase reflexive thematic analysis.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Four themes were developed from 15 interviews: (1) Care, By Name or By Nature; (2) We Know What We Need, Just Listen; (3) The Struggles of Prioritising and Spending; and (4) Nutritional (Im)Balance. Participants experienced a lack of person-centred care in the HCP program, making it difficult to obtain services that met their care needs and preferences. For many, their package budget was insufficient, causing recipients to compromise on services required for safe, independent living. Nutrition was important to HCP recipients but was often not their main priority when prioritising their limited package funding. Nutrition was valued by HCP recipients but often deprioritised for more immediate care needs.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>It is apparent that changes to home care programs are required so recipients are at the centre of their care and have access to resources to help maintain their nutritional health and remain living independently at home. These insights can inform program and policy changes to better support older adults to age-in-place.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":55431,"journal":{"name":"Australasian Journal on Ageing","volume":"45 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13059538/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australasian Journal on Ageing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ajag.70156","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives

To (1) explore the experiences and perceptions of older adults accessing an Australian Government Home Care Package (HCP), (2) understand how recipients prioritise their package expenditure, (3) understand the value that recipients place on food and nutrition services, and (4) understand the barriers and facilitators to spending on these services.

Methods

Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 15 HCP recipients aged 65 years or older located across Australia. Transcripts were analysed using Braun and Clarke's six-phase reflexive thematic analysis.

Results

Four themes were developed from 15 interviews: (1) Care, By Name or By Nature; (2) We Know What We Need, Just Listen; (3) The Struggles of Prioritising and Spending; and (4) Nutritional (Im)Balance. Participants experienced a lack of person-centred care in the HCP program, making it difficult to obtain services that met their care needs and preferences. For many, their package budget was insufficient, causing recipients to compromise on services required for safe, independent living. Nutrition was important to HCP recipients but was often not their main priority when prioritising their limited package funding. Nutrition was valued by HCP recipients but often deprioritised for more immediate care needs.

Conclusion

It is apparent that changes to home care programs are required so recipients are at the centre of their care and have access to resources to help maintain their nutritional health and remain living independently at home. These insights can inform program and policy changes to better support older adults to age-in-place.

按名字而非按性质护理:老年人获得包括食品和营养服务的家庭护理包的经验-一项探索性质的研究。
目标:(1)探索老年人获得澳大利亚政府家庭护理一揽子计划(HCP)的经验和看法,(2)了解接受者如何优先考虑他们的一揽子支出,(3)了解接受者对食品和营养服务的重视,以及(4)了解这些服务支出的障碍和促进因素。方法:对澳大利亚各地年龄在65岁及以上的15名HCP受助人进行半结构化访谈。使用Braun和Clarke的六阶段自反主题分析对转录本进行分析。结果:从15个访谈中得出四个主题:(1)护理,按名称或按性质;(2)我们知道我们需要什么,只要倾听;(3)优先级和支出的斗争;(4)营养均衡。参与者在HCP项目中缺乏以人为本的护理,因此难以获得满足其护理需求和偏好的服务。对许多人来说,他们的一揽子预算不足,导致接受者在安全、独立生活所需的服务上妥协。营养对HCP受助者来说很重要,但在优先考虑有限的一揽子资金时,营养往往不是他们的主要优先事项。营养受到HCP接受者的重视,但对于更直接的护理需求往往不受重视。结论:很明显,需要改变家庭护理计划,使受助者处于他们护理的中心,并有机会获得资源来帮助维持他们的营养健康,并保持在家中独立生活。这些见解可以为项目和政策的变化提供信息,以更好地支持老年人就地养老。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Australasian Journal on Ageing
Australasian Journal on Ageing 医学-老年医学
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
6.20%
发文量
114
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Australasian Journal on Ageing is a peer reviewed journal, which publishes original work in any area of gerontology and geriatric medicine. It welcomes international submissions, particularly from authors in the Asia Pacific region.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书