Digital Health Literacy in Hospitalised Older Adults

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q4 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY
Matthew Joel Pappas, Kristy Siostrom, Yu Mei Law, Beatriz Arakawa Martins, Taya Collyer, Chris Moran
{"title":"Digital Health Literacy in Hospitalised Older Adults","authors":"Matthew Joel Pappas,&nbsp;Kristy Siostrom,&nbsp;Yu Mei Law,&nbsp;Beatriz Arakawa Martins,&nbsp;Taya Collyer,&nbsp;Chris Moran","doi":"10.1111/ajag.70158","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objective</h3>\n \n <p>To assess digital health literacy among older adults in a subacute inpatient setting and identify factors associated with greater digital health literacy to inform equitable implementation of patient-facing digital health initiatives.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>We conducted a cross-sectional survey at a single metropolitan subacute hospital involving patients 65 years and older admitted to two Geriatric Evaluation and Management wards between September 2023 and January 2024. Participants completed a survey capturing demographics, technology use and preferences, along with the validated 8-item eHealth Literacy Scale (eHEALS), whereby a score &lt; 26 indicated low eHealth literacy. Additional questions assessed general interest in digital health. Mean eHEALS scores were calculated and associations with patient characteristics analysed using <i>t</i>-tests.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Forty-four participants (mean age 80.1 years; 61% female) were enrolled. The mean eHEALS score was 23.6 (SD 9.4). Tertiary education, preference for digital appointment notifications and owning at least one electronic device were associated with greater eHEALS scores (all <i>p</i> &lt; 0.01). Sensory impairment and prior telehealth use were not associated with statistically significant differences in scores. Many participants lacked access to digital devices or support to use them.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>Older adults in subacute hospital settings demonstrated low eHealth literacy and limited access to digital technologies. Hospitals should consider the heterogeneity of digital skills and access among older patients when implementing digital health solutions. Tailored support, inclusive design and infrastructure investment are essential to avoid exacerbating digital health inequities in inpatient care.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":55431,"journal":{"name":"Australasian Journal on Ageing","volume":"45 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australasian Journal on Ageing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ajag.70158","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

To assess digital health literacy among older adults in a subacute inpatient setting and identify factors associated with greater digital health literacy to inform equitable implementation of patient-facing digital health initiatives.

Methods

We conducted a cross-sectional survey at a single metropolitan subacute hospital involving patients 65 years and older admitted to two Geriatric Evaluation and Management wards between September 2023 and January 2024. Participants completed a survey capturing demographics, technology use and preferences, along with the validated 8-item eHealth Literacy Scale (eHEALS), whereby a score < 26 indicated low eHealth literacy. Additional questions assessed general interest in digital health. Mean eHEALS scores were calculated and associations with patient characteristics analysed using t-tests.

Results

Forty-four participants (mean age 80.1 years; 61% female) were enrolled. The mean eHEALS score was 23.6 (SD 9.4). Tertiary education, preference for digital appointment notifications and owning at least one electronic device were associated with greater eHEALS scores (all p < 0.01). Sensory impairment and prior telehealth use were not associated with statistically significant differences in scores. Many participants lacked access to digital devices or support to use them.

Conclusions

Older adults in subacute hospital settings demonstrated low eHealth literacy and limited access to digital technologies. Hospitals should consider the heterogeneity of digital skills and access among older patients when implementing digital health solutions. Tailored support, inclusive design and infrastructure investment are essential to avoid exacerbating digital health inequities in inpatient care.

住院老年人的数字健康素养。
目的:评估亚急性住院环境中老年人的数字健康素养,并确定与更高数字健康素养相关的因素,以便为公平实施面向患者的数字健康举措提供信息。方法:我们在一家大都市亚急性医院进行了横断面调查,涉及2023年9月至2024年1月期间入住两个老年评估和管理病房的65岁及以上患者。参与者完成了一项调查,包括人口统计、技术使用和偏好,以及经过验证的8项电子健康素养量表(eHEALS)。结果:44名参与者(平均年龄80.1岁,61%为女性)被招募。平均eHEALS评分为23.6 (SD 9.4)。高等教育程度、对数字预约通知的偏好以及拥有至少一种电子设备与更高的eHEALS评分相关(均为p)。结论:亚急性医院环境中的老年人表现出较低的电子健康素养和有限的数字技术获取。医院在实施数字医疗解决方案时应考虑老年患者数字技能和获取途径的异质性。量身定制的支持、包容性设计和基础设施投资对于避免加剧住院护理中的数字卫生不平等至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Australasian Journal on Ageing
Australasian Journal on Ageing 医学-老年医学
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
6.20%
发文量
114
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Australasian Journal on Ageing is a peer reviewed journal, which publishes original work in any area of gerontology and geriatric medicine. It welcomes international submissions, particularly from authors in the Asia Pacific region.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书