Ethical Considerations for the Use of Artificial Intelligence Tools in Surgery.

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q4 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Clinics in Colon and Rectal Surgery Pub Date : 2026-01-10 eCollection Date: 2026-05-01 DOI:10.1055/a-2769-0687
Nicole Meredyth, Paola A Barrios
{"title":"Ethical Considerations for the Use of Artificial Intelligence Tools in Surgery.","authors":"Nicole Meredyth, Paola A Barrios","doi":"10.1055/a-2769-0687","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Artificial intelligence (AI) is rapidly transforming surgical care, offering unprecedented capabilities in diagnostics, planning, and intraoperative guidance. However, its integration into clinical practice raises complex ethical challenges that must be addressed to ensure responsible and equitable use. This chapter aims to explore the ethical implications of AI in surgery through the lens of the four foundational principles of medical ethics: autonomy, beneficence, nonmaleficence, and justice. Respecting patient autonomy requires clinicians to disclose all relevant information and ensure understanding of a proposed intervention (or AI tool) for a patient to make an informed, voluntary decision. Numerous studies have shown that both patients and clinicians often lack sufficient understanding of AI tools, complicating efforts to explain their intended function, or obtain truly informed consent for their use in patient care. This has the potential to diminish trust in the patient-clinician relationship and must be considered when using AI tools. AI's potential to uphold beneficence is evident in its ability to enhance surgical precision and outcomes. Yet, its reliance on historical data introduces risks of bias and error, threatening the principle of nonmaleficence. In this chapter, we explore these topics further to highlight the need for robust oversight and clinician involvement to prevent harm to patients. When biased data are used to train an AI tool, it may lead to unequal care across patient populations-i.e., exacerbating existing disparities in health care. Additionally, the lack of clear accountability for AI-driven errors raises legal and ethical concerns about liability-whether it lies with clinicians, health care institutions, or developers. To ethically integrate AI into surgical practice, the chapter calls for comprehensive frameworks that ensure transparency, data integrity, clinician and patient education, and regulatory oversight. These measures are essential to safeguard patient welfare as AI continues to reshape the future of surgical care.</p>","PeriodicalId":48754,"journal":{"name":"Clinics in Colon and Rectal Surgery","volume":"39 3","pages":"169-173"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-01-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13053107/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinics in Colon and Rectal Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2769-0687","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/5/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Artificial intelligence (AI) is rapidly transforming surgical care, offering unprecedented capabilities in diagnostics, planning, and intraoperative guidance. However, its integration into clinical practice raises complex ethical challenges that must be addressed to ensure responsible and equitable use. This chapter aims to explore the ethical implications of AI in surgery through the lens of the four foundational principles of medical ethics: autonomy, beneficence, nonmaleficence, and justice. Respecting patient autonomy requires clinicians to disclose all relevant information and ensure understanding of a proposed intervention (or AI tool) for a patient to make an informed, voluntary decision. Numerous studies have shown that both patients and clinicians often lack sufficient understanding of AI tools, complicating efforts to explain their intended function, or obtain truly informed consent for their use in patient care. This has the potential to diminish trust in the patient-clinician relationship and must be considered when using AI tools. AI's potential to uphold beneficence is evident in its ability to enhance surgical precision and outcomes. Yet, its reliance on historical data introduces risks of bias and error, threatening the principle of nonmaleficence. In this chapter, we explore these topics further to highlight the need for robust oversight and clinician involvement to prevent harm to patients. When biased data are used to train an AI tool, it may lead to unequal care across patient populations-i.e., exacerbating existing disparities in health care. Additionally, the lack of clear accountability for AI-driven errors raises legal and ethical concerns about liability-whether it lies with clinicians, health care institutions, or developers. To ethically integrate AI into surgical practice, the chapter calls for comprehensive frameworks that ensure transparency, data integrity, clinician and patient education, and regulatory oversight. These measures are essential to safeguard patient welfare as AI continues to reshape the future of surgical care.

外科手术中使用人工智能工具的伦理考虑。
人工智能(AI)正在迅速改变外科护理,在诊断、计划和术中指导方面提供前所未有的能力。然而,将其纳入临床实践提出了复杂的伦理挑战,必须解决这些挑战,以确保负责任和公平使用。本章旨在通过医学伦理学的四个基本原则:自主、有益、无害和正义来探讨人工智能在外科手术中的伦理意义。尊重患者自主权要求临床医生披露所有相关信息,并确保了解拟议的干预措施(或人工智能工具),以便患者做出知情、自愿的决定。大量研究表明,患者和临床医生往往对人工智能工具缺乏足够的了解,这使得解释其预期功能或在患者护理中获得真正的知情同意的努力变得复杂。这可能会减少对医患关系的信任,在使用人工智能工具时必须考虑到这一点。人工智能支持慈善事业的潜力在其提高手术精度和结果的能力上是显而易见的。然而,它对历史数据的依赖带来了偏见和错误的风险,威胁到非恶意原则。在本章中,我们进一步探讨这些主题,以强调需要强有力的监督和临床医生的参与,以防止对患者的伤害。当使用有偏见的数据来训练人工智能工具时,可能会导致患者群体之间的护理不平等。加剧了保健方面现有的差距。此外,对人工智能导致的错误缺乏明确的问责制,引发了对责任的法律和道德担忧——无论是临床医生、医疗机构还是开发人员。为了在道德上将人工智能整合到外科实践中,该章节呼吁建立全面的框架,以确保透明度、数据完整性、临床医生和患者教育以及监管监督。随着人工智能继续重塑外科护理的未来,这些措施对于保障患者福利至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Clinics in Colon and Rectal Surgery
Clinics in Colon and Rectal Surgery GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGYSURGERY-SURGERY
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
7.10%
发文量
84
期刊介绍: Clinics in Colon and Rectal Surgery is a review journal that publishes topic-specific issues on diseases of the small bowel, colon, rectum, and anus. Designed for clinicians, researchers, and educators involved with diseases of the intestinal tract, the journal covers a broad spectrum of basic information, controversial clinical issues, and established and innovative diagnostic techniques. Issue topics comprehensively cover the entire specialty over a 3-4 year period, allowing the articles to serve as study material for educational programs and certifying examinations. The inclusion of research and clinical material also allows physicians to remain knowledgeable of current advances in the specialty.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书