A house is not a home: Shelter preferences of laboratory mice.

IF 1.3 4区 农林科学 Q2 VETERINARY SCIENCES
Alina Bonorand, Marie Leekens, Bernhard Voelkl, Hanno Würbel, Janja Novak
{"title":"A house is not a home: Shelter preferences of laboratory mice.","authors":"Alina Bonorand, Marie Leekens, Bernhard Voelkl, Hanno Würbel, Janja Novak","doi":"10.1177/00236772251404062","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The design of many shelters for laboratory mice, particularly plastic shelters, is mainly driven by economic, ergonomic and hygiene considerations, with little focus on providing the animals with opportunities to express species-specific behaviours and control over their environment. Even in the presence of artificial shelters (plastic houses, tunnels), laboratory mice will readily burrow if given the opportunity. The main aim of this study was to gain a better understanding of the importance of access to sheltered space for laboratory mice. We pair-housed mice (BALB/c, SWISS and C57BL/6, male and female) in conventional laboratory cages that contained either (i) resources to build underground shelter (burrowing substrate) or (ii) artificial structures providing shelter (e.g. red plastic house). We assessed how mice used these resources, as well as their preferences when given a choice between different shelters. In addition, we assessed the insulating properties of different shelters. Mice spent most of their time underground in deep bedding and the least time inside the standard red plastic house, where they nested outside the house. They also showed a strong preference for the deep burrow cage, and the most relevant features of preferred shelters seem to be darkness and being underground. Nesting material alone was also less insulating, possibly contributing to an increased need for non-shivering thermogenesis.</p>","PeriodicalId":18013,"journal":{"name":"Laboratory Animals","volume":" ","pages":"236772251404062"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Laboratory Animals","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00236772251404062","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"VETERINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The design of many shelters for laboratory mice, particularly plastic shelters, is mainly driven by economic, ergonomic and hygiene considerations, with little focus on providing the animals with opportunities to express species-specific behaviours and control over their environment. Even in the presence of artificial shelters (plastic houses, tunnels), laboratory mice will readily burrow if given the opportunity. The main aim of this study was to gain a better understanding of the importance of access to sheltered space for laboratory mice. We pair-housed mice (BALB/c, SWISS and C57BL/6, male and female) in conventional laboratory cages that contained either (i) resources to build underground shelter (burrowing substrate) or (ii) artificial structures providing shelter (e.g. red plastic house). We assessed how mice used these resources, as well as their preferences when given a choice between different shelters. In addition, we assessed the insulating properties of different shelters. Mice spent most of their time underground in deep bedding and the least time inside the standard red plastic house, where they nested outside the house. They also showed a strong preference for the deep burrow cage, and the most relevant features of preferred shelters seem to be darkness and being underground. Nesting material alone was also less insulating, possibly contributing to an increased need for non-shivering thermogenesis.

房子不是家:实验室老鼠的庇护偏好。
许多实验室小鼠庇护所的设计,特别是塑料庇护所,主要是出于经济、人体工程学和卫生方面的考虑,很少关注为动物提供表达物种特定行为和控制环境的机会。即使有人工庇护所(塑料房子、隧道),只要有机会,实验室老鼠也会很乐意挖洞。这项研究的主要目的是为了更好地了解实验室小鼠获得庇护空间的重要性。我们将雄性和雌性小鼠(BALB/c、SWISS和C57BL/6)配对饲养在传统的实验室笼子中,这些笼子要么包含(i)建造地下庇护所的资源(挖洞基质),要么包含(ii)提供庇护所的人工结构(例如红色塑料屋)。我们评估了老鼠如何使用这些资源,以及它们在不同的庇护所之间做出选择时的偏好。此外,我们还评估了不同遮蔽物的绝缘性能。老鼠大部分时间都在地下的深床上度过,在标准的红色塑料房子里的时间最少,它们在房子外面筑巢。它们也表现出对深洞笼子的强烈偏好,而偏好庇护所的最相关特征似乎是黑暗和地下。单独的筑巢材料隔热效果也较差,这可能导致对非颤抖产热的需求增加。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Laboratory Animals
Laboratory Animals 生物-动物学
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
8.30%
发文量
64
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The international journal of laboratory animal science and welfare, Laboratory Animals publishes peer-reviewed original papers and reviews on all aspects of the use of animals in biomedical research. The journal promotes improvements in the welfare or well-being of the animals used, it particularly focuses on research that reduces the number of animals used or which replaces animal models with in vitro alternatives.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书