Inequalities in NHS staff support among those from ethnic minority and migrant groups during the COVID-19 pandemic.

IF 3.1 2区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Bethany Croak, Danielle Lamb, Sharon A M Stevelink, Rupa Bhundia, Juliana Onwumere, Brendan Dempsey, Pamela Almeida-Meza, Zoe Chui, Neil Greenberg, Rosalind Raine, Charlotte Woodhead, Stephani L Hatch, Rebecca Rhead
{"title":"Inequalities in NHS staff support among those from ethnic minority and migrant groups during the COVID-19 pandemic.","authors":"Bethany Croak, Danielle Lamb, Sharon A M Stevelink, Rupa Bhundia, Juliana Onwumere, Brendan Dempsey, Pamela Almeida-Meza, Zoe Chui, Neil Greenberg, Rosalind Raine, Charlotte Woodhead, Stephani L Hatch, Rebecca Rhead","doi":"10.1136/oemed-2025-110203","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>During the COVID-19 pandemic, National Health Service staff support services were implemented to promote healthcare workers' (HCWs) well-being, alongside informal support from colleagues and managers. Certain groups may be less likely to access support, including HCWs from ethnic minority and migrant groups. These HCWs are more likely to experience discrimination and abuse at work, which may also erode access to positive and protective resources. Therefore, this study examined variation in formal support programme use and perceptions of support from managers and colleagues by ethnicity and migration status.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study analysed survey data from 9769 HCWs in England who completed the baseline survey (launched April 2020) and the 6-month follow-up using descriptive statistics and binary logistic regression.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>At 6 months, 51% of participants met the threshold for probable common mental disorder. HCWs from White Other (Adjusted Odds Ratio (AOR) 0.79; 95% CI 0.64 to 0.99) and Asian ethnic groups (AOR 0.65; 95% CI 0.57 to 0.74) were less likely to feel supported by their colleagues than White British HCWs. Similarly, those born outside of the UK and European Union were less likely to feel supported by their colleagues than UK-born HCWs (AOR 0.70; 95% CI 0.52 to 0.94). No variations in support programme use or manager support were found across ethnicity or migration status.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The study suggests equitable formal support but identified critical disparities in perceived support from colleagues for HCWs during the COVID-19 pandemic. Improving workplace well-being should address the underlying social and structural factors that influence peer support and belonging.</p>","PeriodicalId":19459,"journal":{"name":"Occupational and Environmental Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"29-35"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13151436/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Occupational and Environmental Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/oemed-2025-110203","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: During the COVID-19 pandemic, National Health Service staff support services were implemented to promote healthcare workers' (HCWs) well-being, alongside informal support from colleagues and managers. Certain groups may be less likely to access support, including HCWs from ethnic minority and migrant groups. These HCWs are more likely to experience discrimination and abuse at work, which may also erode access to positive and protective resources. Therefore, this study examined variation in formal support programme use and perceptions of support from managers and colleagues by ethnicity and migration status.

Methods: This study analysed survey data from 9769 HCWs in England who completed the baseline survey (launched April 2020) and the 6-month follow-up using descriptive statistics and binary logistic regression.

Results: At 6 months, 51% of participants met the threshold for probable common mental disorder. HCWs from White Other (Adjusted Odds Ratio (AOR) 0.79; 95% CI 0.64 to 0.99) and Asian ethnic groups (AOR 0.65; 95% CI 0.57 to 0.74) were less likely to feel supported by their colleagues than White British HCWs. Similarly, those born outside of the UK and European Union were less likely to feel supported by their colleagues than UK-born HCWs (AOR 0.70; 95% CI 0.52 to 0.94). No variations in support programme use or manager support were found across ethnicity or migration status.

Conclusions: The study suggests equitable formal support but identified critical disparities in perceived support from colleagues for HCWs during the COVID-19 pandemic. Improving workplace well-being should address the underlying social and structural factors that influence peer support and belonging.

2019冠状病毒病大流行期间,少数民族和移民群体在NHS工作人员支持方面的不平等现象。
目标:在2019冠状病毒病大流行期间,实施了国家卫生服务系统工作人员支持服务,以促进卫生保健工作者的福祉,并提供同事和管理人员的非正式支持。某些群体可能不太可能获得支持,包括少数民族和移民群体的卫生保健工作者。这些卫生保健工作者更有可能在工作中遭受歧视和虐待,这也可能削弱他们获得积极和保护性资源的机会。因此,本研究考察了不同种族和移民身份的管理人员和同事在正式支持方案使用和对支持的看法方面的差异。方法:本研究使用描述性统计和二元逻辑回归分析了英国9769名HCWs的调查数据,这些HCWs完成了基线调查(2020年4月启动)和6个月的随访。结果:在6个月时,51%的参与者达到了可能的普通精神障碍的阈值。来自其他白人的HCWs(调整优势比(AOR) 0.79;95% CI 0.64 ~ 0.99)和亚洲族裔群体(AOR 0.65; 95% CI 0.57 ~ 0.74)比英国白人卫生保健工作者更不可能感到得到同事的支持。同样,那些出生在英国和欧盟以外的人比出生在英国的卫生保健工作者更不可能感到得到同事的支持(AOR 0.70; 95% CI 0.52至0.94)。在支持方案的使用或管理人员的支持方面,没有发现不同种族或移民身份的差异。结论:该研究表明,在COVID-19大流行期间,公平的正式支持,但发现同事对卫生保健工作者的支持存在严重差异。改善工作场所的幸福感应解决影响同伴支持和归属感的潜在社会和结构因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Occupational and Environmental Medicine
Occupational and Environmental Medicine 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
8.30
自引率
2.00%
发文量
98
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Occupational and Environmental Medicine is an international peer reviewed journal covering current developments in occupational and environmental health worldwide. Occupational and Environmental Medicine publishes high-quality research relating to the full range of chemical, physical, ergonomic, biological and psychosocial hazards in the workplace and to environmental contaminants and their health effects. The journal welcomes research aimed at improving the evidence-based practice of occupational and environmental research; including the development and application of novel biological and statistical techniques in addition to evaluation of interventions in controlling occupational and environmental risks.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书