Metrological Foundations for Soil Analysis: A Global Review of Certified Reference Materials for Agricultural Laboratories

IF 1.3 4区 工程技术 Q4 INSTRUMENTS & INSTRUMENTATION
MAPAN Pub Date : 2026-03-16 DOI:10.1007/s12647-026-00894-6
Aziz Soulaimani, Reda Oulfakir, Latifa Hajji, Said Gmouh
{"title":"Metrological Foundations for Soil Analysis: A Global Review of Certified Reference Materials for Agricultural Laboratories","authors":"Aziz Soulaimani,&nbsp;Reda Oulfakir,&nbsp;Latifa Hajji,&nbsp;Said Gmouh","doi":"10.1007/s12647-026-00894-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Certified Reference Materials (CRMs) constitute the metrological foundation for reliable and comparable soil measurements in agricultural laboratories worldwide. They provide SI-traceable benchmarks for instrument calibration, method validation, and quality control in the determination of key agronomic parameters, including texture, pH, electrical conductivity, organic carbon, macro- and micronutrients, and potentially toxic elements.</p><p>This review critically examines the international metrological framework governing soil CRMs, with emphasis on ISO/IEC 17025, ISO 17034, and the emerging ISO 33400 series (notably ISO 33405 and ISO 33401), which collectively define requirements for sampling, pretreatment, homogenization, homogeneity and stability assessment, characterization, value assignment, and uncertainty evaluation. It summarises global advances in CRM production and evaluates the current availability of soil matrix CRMs from major producers such as NIST, BAM, LGC, and the JRC.</p><p>Despite a growing market, the portfolio of soil CRMs remains limited relative to the diversity of pedological and agro-climatic conditions. High acquisition costs, logistical constraints, and limited regional production capacity particularly constrain laboratories in emerging economies, hindering method validation, proficiency testing, accreditation, and interlaboratory comparability.</p><p>The review identifies critical gaps in matrix-specific soil CRMs that should be addressed as a priority and outlines the investment, infrastructure development, and international collaboration required to strengthen regional production capabilities and metrological traceability chains. Addressing these gaps is essential to enhance measurement confidence, support ISO/IEC 17025 accreditation, and underpin evidence-based agricultural management, food security, and environmental regulation.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":689,"journal":{"name":"MAPAN","volume":"41 1","pages":"341 - 359"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"MAPAN","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12647-026-00894-6","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"INSTRUMENTS & INSTRUMENTATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Certified Reference Materials (CRMs) constitute the metrological foundation for reliable and comparable soil measurements in agricultural laboratories worldwide. They provide SI-traceable benchmarks for instrument calibration, method validation, and quality control in the determination of key agronomic parameters, including texture, pH, electrical conductivity, organic carbon, macro- and micronutrients, and potentially toxic elements.

This review critically examines the international metrological framework governing soil CRMs, with emphasis on ISO/IEC 17025, ISO 17034, and the emerging ISO 33400 series (notably ISO 33405 and ISO 33401), which collectively define requirements for sampling, pretreatment, homogenization, homogeneity and stability assessment, characterization, value assignment, and uncertainty evaluation. It summarises global advances in CRM production and evaluates the current availability of soil matrix CRMs from major producers such as NIST, BAM, LGC, and the JRC.

Despite a growing market, the portfolio of soil CRMs remains limited relative to the diversity of pedological and agro-climatic conditions. High acquisition costs, logistical constraints, and limited regional production capacity particularly constrain laboratories in emerging economies, hindering method validation, proficiency testing, accreditation, and interlaboratory comparability.

The review identifies critical gaps in matrix-specific soil CRMs that should be addressed as a priority and outlines the investment, infrastructure development, and international collaboration required to strengthen regional production capabilities and metrological traceability chains. Addressing these gaps is essential to enhance measurement confidence, support ISO/IEC 17025 accreditation, and underpin evidence-based agricultural management, food security, and environmental regulation.

Abstract Image

土壤分析的计量基础:农业实验室认证标准物质的全球综述
认证标准物质(CRMs)是全球农业实验室可靠和可比土壤测量的计量基础。它们为仪器校准、方法验证和关键农艺参数确定的质量控制提供了si可追溯的基准,包括质地、pH值、电导率、有机碳、宏量和微量营养素以及潜在有毒元素。这篇综述批判性地考察了管理土壤crm的国际计量框架,重点是ISO/IEC 17025、ISO 17034和新兴的ISO 33400系列(特别是ISO 33405和ISO 33401),它们共同定义了采样、预处理、均质化、均质性和稳定性评估、表征、值分配和不确定度评估的要求。它总结了CRM生产的全球进展,并评估了NIST、BAM、LGC和JRC等主要生产商目前土壤基质CRM的可用性。尽管市场不断增长,但相对于土壤学和农业气候条件的多样性,土壤crm的组合仍然有限。高昂的采购成本、后勤限制和有限的区域生产能力尤其限制了新兴经济体的实验室,阻碍了方法验证、熟练程度测试、认证和实验室间的可比性。该报告确定了应作为优先事项解决的特定基质土壤crm方面的关键差距,并概述了加强区域生产能力和计量可追溯链所需的投资、基础设施发展和国际合作。解决这些差距对于增强测量信心、支持ISO/IEC 17025认证以及支持基于证据的农业管理、粮食安全和环境监管至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
MAPAN
MAPAN 工程技术-物理:应用
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
20.00%
发文量
91
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: MAPAN-Journal Metrology Society of India is a quarterly publication. It is exclusively devoted to Metrology (Scientific, Industrial or Legal). It has been fulfilling an important need of Metrologists and particularly of quality practitioners by publishing exclusive articles on scientific, industrial and legal metrology. The journal publishes research communication or technical articles of current interest in measurement science; original work, tutorial or survey papers in any metrology related area; reviews and analytical studies in metrology; case studies on reliability, uncertainty in measurements; and reports and results of intercomparison and proficiency testing.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书