Holmium Laser Enucleation of the Prostate Vs. Bipolar Transurethral Resection of the Prostate for Small-Volume Prostates: A Comparative Analysis of Clinical Outcomes.

IF 1.1 0 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
Abdullah Gölbaşı, Burak Elmaağaç, Hüseyin Biçer, Ali Yasin Özercan, Sefa Günal, Murat Keske
{"title":"Holmium Laser Enucleation of the Prostate Vs. Bipolar Transurethral Resection of the Prostate for Small-Volume Prostates: A Comparative Analysis of Clinical Outcomes.","authors":"Abdullah Gölbaşı, Burak Elmaağaç, Hüseyin Biçer, Ali Yasin Özercan, Sefa Günal, Murat Keske","doi":"10.5152/tud.2026.25132","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Benign prostatic hyperplasia is a common cause of lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) in aging men. While transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) is the traditional surgical standard, holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP) has emerged as a safe and effective alternative. Evidence comparing both techniques in small prostates (<50 mL) remains limited.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective study included male patients aged 40-80 years who underwent bipolar TURP (B-TURP) or HoLEP between 2023 and 2025 for LUTS refractory to medical therapy, with prostate volume <50 mL. Pre- and postoperative parameters, including operative time, resected tissue weight, irrigation volume, hospital stay, catheterization time, and functional scores (International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS), International Index of Erectile Function-5 (IIEF-5), International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire-Short Form (ICIQ-SF), peak urinary flow rate (Qmax), postvoid residual urine (PVR)) were compared.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>No significant differences were found between groups regarding age, body mass index, comorbidities, prostate-specific antigen, prostate volume, ICIQ-SF scores, IIEF-5, complication rates, or postoperative hemoglobin decrease (all P > .05). Holmium laser enucleation of the prostate showed longer operative time, greater irrigation use, and higher resected tissue weight/percentage (P = .03, .02, <.001, <.001), while hospital stay and catheterization were shorter (both P < .001). Both procedures improved Qmax and IPSS and reduced PVR (all P < .001); the increase in Qmax was greater in HoLEP (P = .025).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Both B-TURP and HoLEP are safe and effective for small prostates; however, HoLEP offers advantages in resected tissue weight, Qmax improvement, and shorter hospital stay/catheterization.   Cite this article as: G.lbaşı A, Elmaağa. B, Bi.er H, .zercan AY, Günal S, Keske M. Holmium laser enucleation of the prostate vs. bipolar transurethral resection of the prostate for small-volume prostates: A comparative analysis of clinical outcomes. Urol Res Pract. 2025;51(6):225-229.</p>","PeriodicalId":101337,"journal":{"name":"Urology research & practice","volume":"51 6","pages":"225-229"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13034006/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Urology research & practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5152/tud.2026.25132","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Benign prostatic hyperplasia is a common cause of lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) in aging men. While transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) is the traditional surgical standard, holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP) has emerged as a safe and effective alternative. Evidence comparing both techniques in small prostates (<50 mL) remains limited.

Methods: This retrospective study included male patients aged 40-80 years who underwent bipolar TURP (B-TURP) or HoLEP between 2023 and 2025 for LUTS refractory to medical therapy, with prostate volume <50 mL. Pre- and postoperative parameters, including operative time, resected tissue weight, irrigation volume, hospital stay, catheterization time, and functional scores (International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS), International Index of Erectile Function-5 (IIEF-5), International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire-Short Form (ICIQ-SF), peak urinary flow rate (Qmax), postvoid residual urine (PVR)) were compared.

Results: No significant differences were found between groups regarding age, body mass index, comorbidities, prostate-specific antigen, prostate volume, ICIQ-SF scores, IIEF-5, complication rates, or postoperative hemoglobin decrease (all P > .05). Holmium laser enucleation of the prostate showed longer operative time, greater irrigation use, and higher resected tissue weight/percentage (P = .03, .02, <.001, <.001), while hospital stay and catheterization were shorter (both P < .001). Both procedures improved Qmax and IPSS and reduced PVR (all P < .001); the increase in Qmax was greater in HoLEP (P = .025).

Conclusion: Both B-TURP and HoLEP are safe and effective for small prostates; however, HoLEP offers advantages in resected tissue weight, Qmax improvement, and shorter hospital stay/catheterization.   Cite this article as: G.lbaşı A, Elmaağa. B, Bi.er H, .zercan AY, Günal S, Keske M. Holmium laser enucleation of the prostate vs. bipolar transurethral resection of the prostate for small-volume prostates: A comparative analysis of clinical outcomes. Urol Res Pract. 2025;51(6):225-229.

钬激光前列腺切除术与双极经尿道前列腺切除术治疗小体积前列腺:临床结果的比较分析。
目的:良性前列腺增生是老年男性下尿路症状的常见原因。虽然经尿道前列腺切除术(TURP)是传统的手术标准,但钬激光前列腺摘除(HoLEP)已成为一种安全有效的替代方法。比较两种技术治疗小前列腺的证据(方法:本回顾性研究纳入了2023年至2025年间因药物治疗难治性LUTS而接受双极TURP (B-TURP)或HoLEP的40-80岁男性患者,与前列腺体积相关。两组在年龄、体重指数、合并症、前列腺特异性抗原、前列腺体积、ICIQ-SF评分、IIEF-5、并发症发生率、术后血红蛋白下降等方面均无显著差异(P < 0.05)。钬激光前列腺摘除手术时间较长,冲洗次数较多,切除组织重量/百分比较高(P = 0.03, P = 0.03, P = 0.04)。02、结论:B-TURP与HoLEP治疗小前列腺安全有效;然而,HoLEP在切除组织重量、Qmax改善和缩短住院时间/插管时间方面具有优势。引用本文:g.l ba, Elmaağa。B, Bi。H,。陈建军,陈建军,陈建军,等。钬激光前列腺切除术与双极经尿道前列腺切除术治疗小体积前列腺的临床疗效对比分析。法律法规,2015;51(6):225-229。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书