Key aspects to optimize inhalation therapy in people with respiratory diseases: a review integrating clinical, technological, and educational evidence.

IF 5.4
Expert opinion on drug delivery Pub Date : 2026-07-01 Epub Date: 2026-04-09 DOI:10.1080/17425247.2026.2656505
Rodrigo Torres-Castro, Matías Otto-Yáñez, Natália Lopes Cardoso, Homero Puppo, Daniel Zenteno, Gema Pérez-Alarcón, Miguel Antúnez Riveros, Vanessa Resqueti, Roberto Vera-Uribe
{"title":"Key aspects to optimize inhalation therapy in people with respiratory diseases: a review integrating clinical, technological, and educational evidence.","authors":"Rodrigo Torres-Castro, Matías Otto-Yáñez, Natália Lopes Cardoso, Homero Puppo, Daniel Zenteno, Gema Pérez-Alarcón, Miguel Antúnez Riveros, Vanessa Resqueti, Roberto Vera-Uribe","doi":"10.1080/17425247.2026.2656505","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Respiratory diseases represent a significant global health burden, and inhaled drug therapy remains a central component in their management. Despite the availability of effective medications, suboptimal device selection, poor inhaler technique, and limited patient education substantially compromise treatment effectiveness. The expanding diversity of inhaler devices, spacers, and valved holding chambers (VHCs) has enabled more individualized care but has also increased clinical complexity.</p><p><strong>Areas covered: </strong>This review synthesizes current evidence on inhaler device selection and use, with particular emphasis on pressurized metered-dose inhalers combined with spacers or VHCs, chamber characteristics, and dry powder inhalers. It also addresses common inhaler technique errors, hygiene, and maintenance, and the role of educational programs. Evidence from bench studies, clinical trials, pharmacokinetic investigations, and guideline documents is integrated to highlight how device design, patient-related factors, and training interact to determine drug delivery and clinical outcomes.</p><p><strong>Expert opinion: </strong>Optimizing inhaled therapy requires viewing each inhaler-patient pairing as a specific delivery system rather than interchangeable components. Durable antistatic VHCs, appropriate interfaces, and regular technique assessment with targeted education should be the standard of care. Future efforts should prioritize device-specific guidance, scalable education strategies, and implementation research to close the persistent gap between evidence and real-world practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":94004,"journal":{"name":"Expert opinion on drug delivery","volume":" ","pages":"1193-1209"},"PeriodicalIF":5.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Expert opinion on drug delivery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17425247.2026.2656505","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/4/9 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Respiratory diseases represent a significant global health burden, and inhaled drug therapy remains a central component in their management. Despite the availability of effective medications, suboptimal device selection, poor inhaler technique, and limited patient education substantially compromise treatment effectiveness. The expanding diversity of inhaler devices, spacers, and valved holding chambers (VHCs) has enabled more individualized care but has also increased clinical complexity.

Areas covered: This review synthesizes current evidence on inhaler device selection and use, with particular emphasis on pressurized metered-dose inhalers combined with spacers or VHCs, chamber characteristics, and dry powder inhalers. It also addresses common inhaler technique errors, hygiene, and maintenance, and the role of educational programs. Evidence from bench studies, clinical trials, pharmacokinetic investigations, and guideline documents is integrated to highlight how device design, patient-related factors, and training interact to determine drug delivery and clinical outcomes.

Expert opinion: Optimizing inhaled therapy requires viewing each inhaler-patient pairing as a specific delivery system rather than interchangeable components. Durable antistatic VHCs, appropriate interfaces, and regular technique assessment with targeted education should be the standard of care. Future efforts should prioritize device-specific guidance, scalable education strategies, and implementation research to close the persistent gap between evidence and real-world practice.

优化呼吸系统疾病患者吸入疗法的关键方面:综合临床、技术和教育证据的综述。
呼吸系统疾病是全球重大的健康负担,吸入药物治疗仍然是其管理的核心组成部分。尽管有有效的药物,但不理想的设备选择、不良的吸入器技术和有限的患者教育大大降低了治疗效果。吸入器装置、间隔器和有瓣保持室(vhc)的多样性不断扩大,使更个性化的护理成为可能,但也增加了临床的复杂性。涵盖领域:本综述综合了吸入器装置选择和使用的现有证据,特别强调了与间隔器或vhc相结合的加压计量吸入器、腔室特性和干粉吸入器。它还解决了常见的吸入器技术错误,卫生和维护,以及教育计划的作用。来自实验室研究、临床试验、药代动力学调查和指南文件的证据被整合,以突出器械设计、患者相关因素和培训如何相互作用,以决定药物传递和临床结果。专家意见:优化吸入治疗需要将每个吸入器-患者配对视为一个特定的输送系统,而不是可互换的组件。耐用的抗静电vhc,适当的接口,定期的技术评估和有针对性的教育应该是护理的标准。未来的工作应该优先考虑特定设备的指导、可扩展的教育策略和实施研究,以缩小证据与现实世界实践之间的持续差距。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书