{"title":"[HoNOS norms for SMI-patients in acute and long-term clinical care and in FACT care].","authors":"E de Beurs, J Peen, U Nabitz, M B de Koning","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In the Netherlands the Health of the Nation Outcome Scale (HoNOS) has been used for over 20 years, but norms for the HoNOS have not been updated since 2004.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To establish metropolitan HoNOS norm scores for patients with a severe mental illness (SMI) in various types of care.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Anonymized data from a large cohort (n = 7566) from the years 2012-2021 of patients with SMI in acute clinical care (n = 4309), long-term clinical care (n = 822) and in care at flexible assertive community treatment (FACT; n = 2435) were used to establish norms for the index (total) score as well as the scores for clinically meaningful and serious problem areas.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were significant differences in HoNOS scores between the three types of care: patients in acute clinical care had higher scores, long-term clinical care patients scored intermediate, and FACT patients had lower scores. Legal status did not influence the HoNOS score in a meaningful way. Norm tables with raw scores, normalised T-scores and percentile scores were created.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The new norms enable clinicians to estimate the severity of psychopathology and level of functioning in individual patients compared to appropriate reference groups.</p>","PeriodicalId":23100,"journal":{"name":"Tijdschrift voor psychiatrie","volume":"68 3","pages":"111-117"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tijdschrift voor psychiatrie","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: In the Netherlands the Health of the Nation Outcome Scale (HoNOS) has been used for over 20 years, but norms for the HoNOS have not been updated since 2004.
Aim: To establish metropolitan HoNOS norm scores for patients with a severe mental illness (SMI) in various types of care.
Method: Anonymized data from a large cohort (n = 7566) from the years 2012-2021 of patients with SMI in acute clinical care (n = 4309), long-term clinical care (n = 822) and in care at flexible assertive community treatment (FACT; n = 2435) were used to establish norms for the index (total) score as well as the scores for clinically meaningful and serious problem areas.
Results: There were significant differences in HoNOS scores between the three types of care: patients in acute clinical care had higher scores, long-term clinical care patients scored intermediate, and FACT patients had lower scores. Legal status did not influence the HoNOS score in a meaningful way. Norm tables with raw scores, normalised T-scores and percentile scores were created.
Conclusion: The new norms enable clinicians to estimate the severity of psychopathology and level of functioning in individual patients compared to appropriate reference groups.