Antimicrobial Administration Delays for Patients with Suspected Sepsis in a Canadian Emergency Department: Prevalence and Risk Factors.

The Canadian journal of hospital pharmacy Pub Date : 2026-04-08 eCollection Date: 2026-01-01 DOI:10.4212/cjhp.3830
Kristin Kaupp, Sarah Smit, Sarah Burgess, Emily Black, Osama Loubani, Meghan MacKenzie
{"title":"Antimicrobial Administration Delays for Patients with Suspected Sepsis in a Canadian Emergency Department: Prevalence and Risk Factors.","authors":"Kristin Kaupp, Sarah Smit, Sarah Burgess, Emily Black, Osama Loubani, Meghan MacKenzie","doi":"10.4212/cjhp.3830","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>For patients with sepsis, timely administration of antimicrobials is imperative, with evidence demonstrating that delays may be associated with an increase in mortality.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To determine whether antimicrobial administration is delayed among patients with sepsis admitted through the Queen Elizabeth II Health Sciences Centre Emergency Department (QEII-HSC-ED) in Halifax, Nova Scotia.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A single-centre, retrospective health records review was conducted for adult patients with sepsis admitted through the QEII-HSC-ED between January 1, 2021, and December 31, 2022. Differences between groups with and without antimicrobial administration delays were compared by univariate analysis, and an adjusted multivariate regression was completed to examine associations between risk factors and significant delays.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 275 patient encounters were included in the analysis, accounting for a total of 1208 antimicrobial doses: 275 first doses and 933 subsequent doses. Of the 275 patient encounters, 216 (78.5%) had at least one significant dose delay; 135 (49.1%) of the encounters had delay of the first dose, and 169 (61.5%) had delay of a subsequent dose. Of the 933 subsequent doses administered, 276 (29.6%) had a significant delay. Relative to patients admitted to a medicine service, surgical patients had reduced odds of experiencing significant delay of a subsequent dose (odds ratio 0.25, 95% confidence interval 0.08-0.77).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Many patients with sepsis admitted through the QEII-HSC-ED experienced significant delays in administration of first and/or subsequent doses of antimicrobial therapy, which may have increased their risk of negative outcomes. These results can be used to develop future initiatives aimed at improving time to administration of antimicrobials for patients with sepsis admitted to the study institution.</p>","PeriodicalId":94225,"journal":{"name":"The Canadian journal of hospital pharmacy","volume":"79 2","pages":"e3830"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13048766/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Canadian journal of hospital pharmacy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4212/cjhp.3830","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: For patients with sepsis, timely administration of antimicrobials is imperative, with evidence demonstrating that delays may be associated with an increase in mortality.

Objective: To determine whether antimicrobial administration is delayed among patients with sepsis admitted through the Queen Elizabeth II Health Sciences Centre Emergency Department (QEII-HSC-ED) in Halifax, Nova Scotia.

Methods: A single-centre, retrospective health records review was conducted for adult patients with sepsis admitted through the QEII-HSC-ED between January 1, 2021, and December 31, 2022. Differences between groups with and without antimicrobial administration delays were compared by univariate analysis, and an adjusted multivariate regression was completed to examine associations between risk factors and significant delays.

Results: A total of 275 patient encounters were included in the analysis, accounting for a total of 1208 antimicrobial doses: 275 first doses and 933 subsequent doses. Of the 275 patient encounters, 216 (78.5%) had at least one significant dose delay; 135 (49.1%) of the encounters had delay of the first dose, and 169 (61.5%) had delay of a subsequent dose. Of the 933 subsequent doses administered, 276 (29.6%) had a significant delay. Relative to patients admitted to a medicine service, surgical patients had reduced odds of experiencing significant delay of a subsequent dose (odds ratio 0.25, 95% confidence interval 0.08-0.77).

Conclusions: Many patients with sepsis admitted through the QEII-HSC-ED experienced significant delays in administration of first and/or subsequent doses of antimicrobial therapy, which may have increased their risk of negative outcomes. These results can be used to develop future initiatives aimed at improving time to administration of antimicrobials for patients with sepsis admitted to the study institution.

加拿大急诊科疑似脓毒症患者的抗菌药物管理延迟:患病率和危险因素。
背景:对于脓毒症患者,及时给药抗菌素是必要的,有证据表明,延迟给药可能与死亡率的增加有关。目的:确定新斯科舍省哈利法克斯女王伊丽莎白二世卫生科学中心急诊科(QEII-HSC-ED)入院的脓毒症患者是否延迟给药。方法:对2021年1月1日至2022年12月31日期间通过QEII-HSC-ED入院的成年脓毒症患者进行单中心、回顾性健康记录回顾。通过单因素分析比较有和没有抗菌药物给药延迟的组之间的差异,并完成调整后的多因素回归,以检查危险因素与显著延迟之间的关联。结果:275例患者就诊被纳入分析,共1208次用药剂量,其中首次用药275次,后续用药933次。在275例患者中,216例(78.5%)至少有一次显著的剂量延迟;135例(49.1%)的接触者延迟了首次剂量,169例(61.5%)的接触者延迟了后续剂量。在随后的933次注射中,276次(29.6%)有明显的延迟。相对于接受内科治疗的患者,手术患者经历后续剂量显著延迟的几率降低(优势比为0.25,95%可信区间为0.08-0.77)。结论:许多通过QEII-HSC-ED入院的脓毒症患者在首次和/或后续剂量的抗菌药物治疗中出现明显延迟,这可能增加了他们出现阴性结果的风险。这些结果可用于制定未来的举措,旨在缩短研究机构收治的脓毒症患者给药的时间。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书