An Examination of the Relationship Between Fear of Reinjury and Neuromuscular, Musculoskeletal, and Biomechanical Characteristics at the Time of Return to Sport following Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction.

IF 2.4 Q3 SPORT SCIENCES
International Journal of Sports Physical Therapy Pub Date : 2026-04-02 eCollection Date: 2026-01-01 DOI:10.26603/001c.158524
Alessa R Lennon, Mallory S Faherty, Carolyn Killelea, Daniel T Le, Timothy C Sell
{"title":"An Examination of the Relationship Between Fear of Reinjury and Neuromuscular, Musculoskeletal, and Biomechanical Characteristics at the Time of Return to Sport following Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction.","authors":"Alessa R Lennon, Mallory S Faherty, Carolyn Killelea, Daniel T Le, Timothy C Sell","doi":"10.26603/001c.158524","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Kinesiophobia is linked to reinjury risk, decreased physical performance and a major cause of sport dropout following ACL reconstruction (ACLR). Identifying deficits based on kinesiophobia may help with the development of strategies to improve outcomes and decrease the risk of reinjury.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The purpose of this study was to compare individuals with high and low TSK-11 scores across modifiable neuromuscular, musculoskeletal, and biomechanical characteristics at the time of RTS. Study design: Cross-sectional study.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Participants within two months of RTS clearance were recruited from a single academic institution between August 2018 and December 2019. Kinesiophobia was measured using the TSK-11. Lower extremity strength was evaluated using isometric and isokinetic testing. Dynamic postural stability was assessed with a double leg jump to single leg landing onto force plates, from which a dynamic postural stability index was calculated. Jump-landing biomechanics were assessed using a single leg stop jump (SLSJ), and single leg hop performance was measured with a triple hop test. Participants were categorized into low (<17) or high (≥17) kinesiophobia groups based on TSK-11 scores. Means and SD were calculated for all variables. Comparisons were made between groups in lower extremity range of motion, strength, dynamic postural stability, jump landing and single leg hop performance. Independent sample t-tests and Mann-Whitney U tests were used to compare variables between high and low kinesiophobia groups, with Cohen's d used to estimate effect sizes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-seven participants (14 males, 13 females; age = 20.6 ± 6.5; pre-injury Tegner Activity Level = 7.7 ± 1.3) cleared for RTS post-unilateral ACLR volunteered for this study (10 ± 2 months post-ACLR). A significant difference was found between high and low TSK-11 groups for weight-bearing ankle dorsiflexion lunge test (p = 0.011) and single leg stop jump task maximum knee valgus angle (p = 0.007). There was no significant difference between the two groups for any other variable.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Few differences in neuromuscular, musculoskeletal, and biomechanical function were identified between low and high TSK-11 scores at RTS. Results suggest that athletes in this cohort returning to sport have relatively low TSK-11 scores, and that higher scores may be attributed to other factors. Due to the small sample size and relatively low TSK-11 scores, further research is needed to confirm the relationship between kinesiophobia and variables commonly assessed at the time of RTS following ACLR.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>3b.</p>","PeriodicalId":47892,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Sports Physical Therapy","volume":"21 4","pages":"404-414"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13046449/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Sports Physical Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26603/001c.158524","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SPORT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Kinesiophobia is linked to reinjury risk, decreased physical performance and a major cause of sport dropout following ACL reconstruction (ACLR). Identifying deficits based on kinesiophobia may help with the development of strategies to improve outcomes and decrease the risk of reinjury.

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to compare individuals with high and low TSK-11 scores across modifiable neuromuscular, musculoskeletal, and biomechanical characteristics at the time of RTS. Study design: Cross-sectional study.

Methods: Participants within two months of RTS clearance were recruited from a single academic institution between August 2018 and December 2019. Kinesiophobia was measured using the TSK-11. Lower extremity strength was evaluated using isometric and isokinetic testing. Dynamic postural stability was assessed with a double leg jump to single leg landing onto force plates, from which a dynamic postural stability index was calculated. Jump-landing biomechanics were assessed using a single leg stop jump (SLSJ), and single leg hop performance was measured with a triple hop test. Participants were categorized into low (<17) or high (≥17) kinesiophobia groups based on TSK-11 scores. Means and SD were calculated for all variables. Comparisons were made between groups in lower extremity range of motion, strength, dynamic postural stability, jump landing and single leg hop performance. Independent sample t-tests and Mann-Whitney U tests were used to compare variables between high and low kinesiophobia groups, with Cohen's d used to estimate effect sizes.

Results: Twenty-seven participants (14 males, 13 females; age = 20.6 ± 6.5; pre-injury Tegner Activity Level = 7.7 ± 1.3) cleared for RTS post-unilateral ACLR volunteered for this study (10 ± 2 months post-ACLR). A significant difference was found between high and low TSK-11 groups for weight-bearing ankle dorsiflexion lunge test (p = 0.011) and single leg stop jump task maximum knee valgus angle (p = 0.007). There was no significant difference between the two groups for any other variable.

Conclusion: Few differences in neuromuscular, musculoskeletal, and biomechanical function were identified between low and high TSK-11 scores at RTS. Results suggest that athletes in this cohort returning to sport have relatively low TSK-11 scores, and that higher scores may be attributed to other factors. Due to the small sample size and relatively low TSK-11 scores, further research is needed to confirm the relationship between kinesiophobia and variables commonly assessed at the time of RTS following ACLR.

Level of evidence: 3b.

前交叉韧带重建后恢复运动时对再损伤的恐惧与神经肌肉、肌肉骨骼和生物力学特征之间关系的研究。
背景:运动恐惧症与再损伤风险、体能下降和前交叉韧带重建(ACLR)后运动退出的主要原因有关。识别基于运动恐惧症的缺陷可能有助于制定改善结果和降低再损伤风险的策略。目的:本研究的目的是比较RTS时TSK-11得分高和低的个体在可改变的神经肌肉、肌肉骨骼和生物力学特征方面的差异。研究设计:横断面研究。方法:在2018年8月至2019年12月期间从单一学术机构招募RTS清除两个月内的参与者。运动恐惧症使用TSK-11进行测量。下肢强度通过等长和等速测试进行评估。通过双腿跳跃到单腿落在力板上来评估动态姿势稳定性,并以此计算动态姿势稳定性指数。用单腿停止跳(SLSJ)评估起跳落地生物力学,用三跳测试测量单腿跳跃性能。参与者被分为低(结果:27名参与者(14名男性,13名女性;年龄= 20.6±6.5;损伤前Tegner活动水平= 7.7±1.3)在单侧ACLR后自愿参加本研究(ACLR后10±2个月)清除RTS。高、低TSK-11组负重踝关节背屈弓步试验(p = 0.011)和单腿停跳任务最大膝外翻角(p = 0.007)差异有统计学意义。两组在其他变量上无显著差异。结论:RTS时TSK-11评分高低在神经肌肉、肌肉骨骼和生物力学功能方面差异不大。结果表明,该队列中重返运动的运动员的TSK-11分数相对较低,较高的分数可能归因于其他因素。由于样本量小,TSK-11评分相对较低,需要进一步的研究来证实运动恐惧症与ACLR术后RTS时常见的变量之间的关系。证据等级:3b。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
5.90%
发文量
124
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书