Assessing Balance in Young Athletes With and Without Chronic Ankle Instability.

IF 2.1 Q3 SPORT SCIENCES
International Journal of Sports Physical Therapy Pub Date : 2026-04-02 eCollection Date: 2026-01-01 DOI:10.26603/001c.158522
Arisa Parameyong, Jaruta Kunritt, Pimonnat Srinuanyai, Raweewan Chantarat
{"title":"Assessing Balance in Young Athletes With and Without Chronic Ankle Instability.","authors":"Arisa Parameyong, Jaruta Kunritt, Pimonnat Srinuanyai, Raweewan Chantarat","doi":"10.26603/001c.158522","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and purpose: </strong>Chronic ankle instability is a common condition following ankle sprains. While the condition is well-documented in adult and collegiate athletes, its impact on pediatric populations, particularly those engaged in high-intensity sports, remains underexplored. This study aimed to investigate static and dynamic balance performance in young athletes between 8 and 16 years of age with and without chronic ankle instability. # Design and MethodsThirty young athletes were categorized into three groups: ten participants with no history of ankle sprains, called healthy, ten participants with a history of ankle sprain but without persistent symptoms, called copers, and ten participants with clinically diagnosed chronic ankle instability. Static balance was assessed using the Single Leg Stance Test, and dynamic balance was evaluated using the Y-Balance Test (YBT). A one-way ANOVA was analyzed to compare differences among groups, followed by post hoc tests for comparing between groups. # Results Significant group differences were found in static balance under eyes-open conditions on both firm and foam surfaces (p=0.001 and 0.039, respectively). The chronic ankle instability group demonstrated significantly poorer performance compared to the healthy and coper groups. For dynamic balance, significant differences were observed in the anterior, posterolateral reach direction, and the composite YBT score (p=0.009, 0.031, and 0.010, respectively), with the chronic ankle instability group performing significantly worse than the healthy group.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Young athletes with chronic ankle instability exhibit impaired static and dynamic balance performance. Therefore, it is crucial to emphasize appropriate rehabilitation and recovery strategies to prevent long-term consequences and enhance physical performance in this population.</p>","PeriodicalId":47892,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Sports Physical Therapy","volume":"21 4","pages":"379-386"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13046456/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Sports Physical Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26603/001c.158522","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SPORT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and purpose: Chronic ankle instability is a common condition following ankle sprains. While the condition is well-documented in adult and collegiate athletes, its impact on pediatric populations, particularly those engaged in high-intensity sports, remains underexplored. This study aimed to investigate static and dynamic balance performance in young athletes between 8 and 16 years of age with and without chronic ankle instability. # Design and MethodsThirty young athletes were categorized into three groups: ten participants with no history of ankle sprains, called healthy, ten participants with a history of ankle sprain but without persistent symptoms, called copers, and ten participants with clinically diagnosed chronic ankle instability. Static balance was assessed using the Single Leg Stance Test, and dynamic balance was evaluated using the Y-Balance Test (YBT). A one-way ANOVA was analyzed to compare differences among groups, followed by post hoc tests for comparing between groups. # Results Significant group differences were found in static balance under eyes-open conditions on both firm and foam surfaces (p=0.001 and 0.039, respectively). The chronic ankle instability group demonstrated significantly poorer performance compared to the healthy and coper groups. For dynamic balance, significant differences were observed in the anterior, posterolateral reach direction, and the composite YBT score (p=0.009, 0.031, and 0.010, respectively), with the chronic ankle instability group performing significantly worse than the healthy group.

Conclusion: Young athletes with chronic ankle instability exhibit impaired static and dynamic balance performance. Therefore, it is crucial to emphasize appropriate rehabilitation and recovery strategies to prevent long-term consequences and enhance physical performance in this population.

评估有或没有慢性踝关节不稳的年轻运动员的平衡。
背景和目的:慢性踝关节不稳定是踝关节扭伤后的常见情况。虽然这种情况在成人和大学运动员中有充分的记录,但它对儿科人群的影响,特别是那些从事高强度运动的儿童,仍未得到充分的研究。本研究旨在调查8 - 16岁有或无慢性踝关节不稳的年轻运动员的静态和动态平衡表现。设计和方法将30名年轻运动员分为三组:10名没有踝关节扭伤史的参与者称为健康,10名有踝关节扭伤史但没有持续症状的参与者称为copers, 10名临床诊断为慢性踝关节不稳定的参与者。静态平衡使用单腿站立测试评估,动态平衡使用Y-Balance测试(YBT)评估。采用单因素方差分析比较组间差异,随后采用事后检验比较组间差异。结果在睁眼条件下,坚固表面和泡沫表面的静态平衡均存在显著组差异(p分别=0.001和0.039)。与健康组和铜组相比,慢性踝关节不稳定组表现明显较差。在动态平衡方面,两组在前、后外侧到达方向和YBT综合评分上均有显著差异(p分别为0.009、0.031和0.010),慢性踝关节不稳组的表现明显差于健康组。结论:慢性踝关节不稳定的年轻运动员表现出静态和动态平衡能力受损。因此,强调适当的康复和恢复策略以预防长期后果和提高这一人群的身体机能是至关重要的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
5.90%
发文量
124
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书