Stefano Lucchini, Andrea Burla, Andrea Poletto, Francesco Castagnini, Simone Gerardi, Francesco Traina
{"title":"Revision Hip Arthroplasty with a Single-Taper Cementless Conical Revision Stem: Clinical and Radiographic Assessment of 57 Implants.","authors":"Stefano Lucchini, Andrea Burla, Andrea Poletto, Francesco Castagnini, Simone Gerardi, Francesco Traina","doi":"10.4055/cios25006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The optimal stem design for revision hip arthroplasties is still controversial. A retrospective cohort study of revision hip arthroplasties performed using a single-taper cementless conical stem was designed, aiming to assess clinical outcomes, complications and survival rates, and radiological osseointegration, at a minimum follow-up of 2 years.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective observational cohort study was conducted on 57 femoral revision arthroplasties performed between 2004 and 2018 using a cementless monoblock conical tapered stem, with a minimum 2-year follow-up. Clinical outcomes were assessed using the Harris Hip Score (HHS). Radiographic evaluations included stem alignment, bone stock remodeling across Gruen zones, and osseointegration graded using 2 systems: Global Radiographic Score (a 5-scale index combining bone quality and osseointegration) and the Engh criteria (fixation classified as bone ingrowth, stable fibrous fixation, or unstable fixation). Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was also performed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>At a mean follow-up of 6.0 ± 3.9 years, the mean HHS was 86.02 ± 9.73. The cumulative stem survival rate was 96.6% at 60 months and 120 months (implant survival: 96.6% and 89.7%, respectively). Bone stock improved across all Gruen zones, with significant increases in zones 1, 3, and 5. No radiolucent lines were found in 59.6% of proximal femurs and 93.0% of distal femurs. More than half of the stems (54.4%) achieved the maximum Global Radiographic Score (20 / 20), and 84.2% demonstrated bone ingrowth according to the Engh criteria.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The single-taper conical revision stem provided good clinical outcomes and reliable survival rates (96.6%) at 6 and 10 years, with 93% of cases exhibiting very good stem stability.</p>","PeriodicalId":47648,"journal":{"name":"Clinics in Orthopedic Surgery","volume":"18 2","pages":"241-249"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13047398/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinics in Orthopedic Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4055/cios25006","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/3/12 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: The optimal stem design for revision hip arthroplasties is still controversial. A retrospective cohort study of revision hip arthroplasties performed using a single-taper cementless conical stem was designed, aiming to assess clinical outcomes, complications and survival rates, and radiological osseointegration, at a minimum follow-up of 2 years.
Methods: A retrospective observational cohort study was conducted on 57 femoral revision arthroplasties performed between 2004 and 2018 using a cementless monoblock conical tapered stem, with a minimum 2-year follow-up. Clinical outcomes were assessed using the Harris Hip Score (HHS). Radiographic evaluations included stem alignment, bone stock remodeling across Gruen zones, and osseointegration graded using 2 systems: Global Radiographic Score (a 5-scale index combining bone quality and osseointegration) and the Engh criteria (fixation classified as bone ingrowth, stable fibrous fixation, or unstable fixation). Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was also performed.
Results: At a mean follow-up of 6.0 ± 3.9 years, the mean HHS was 86.02 ± 9.73. The cumulative stem survival rate was 96.6% at 60 months and 120 months (implant survival: 96.6% and 89.7%, respectively). Bone stock improved across all Gruen zones, with significant increases in zones 1, 3, and 5. No radiolucent lines were found in 59.6% of proximal femurs and 93.0% of distal femurs. More than half of the stems (54.4%) achieved the maximum Global Radiographic Score (20 / 20), and 84.2% demonstrated bone ingrowth according to the Engh criteria.
Conclusions: The single-taper conical revision stem provided good clinical outcomes and reliable survival rates (96.6%) at 6 and 10 years, with 93% of cases exhibiting very good stem stability.