Revision Hip Arthroplasty with a Single-Taper Cementless Conical Revision Stem: Clinical and Radiographic Assessment of 57 Implants.

IF 2.5 2区 医学 Q2 ORTHOPEDICS
Clinics in Orthopedic Surgery Pub Date : 2026-04-01 Epub Date: 2026-03-12 DOI:10.4055/cios25006
Stefano Lucchini, Andrea Burla, Andrea Poletto, Francesco Castagnini, Simone Gerardi, Francesco Traina
{"title":"Revision Hip Arthroplasty with a Single-Taper Cementless Conical Revision Stem: Clinical and Radiographic Assessment of 57 Implants.","authors":"Stefano Lucchini, Andrea Burla, Andrea Poletto, Francesco Castagnini, Simone Gerardi, Francesco Traina","doi":"10.4055/cios25006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The optimal stem design for revision hip arthroplasties is still controversial. A retrospective cohort study of revision hip arthroplasties performed using a single-taper cementless conical stem was designed, aiming to assess clinical outcomes, complications and survival rates, and radiological osseointegration, at a minimum follow-up of 2 years.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective observational cohort study was conducted on 57 femoral revision arthroplasties performed between 2004 and 2018 using a cementless monoblock conical tapered stem, with a minimum 2-year follow-up. Clinical outcomes were assessed using the Harris Hip Score (HHS). Radiographic evaluations included stem alignment, bone stock remodeling across Gruen zones, and osseointegration graded using 2 systems: Global Radiographic Score (a 5-scale index combining bone quality and osseointegration) and the Engh criteria (fixation classified as bone ingrowth, stable fibrous fixation, or unstable fixation). Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was also performed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>At a mean follow-up of 6.0 ± 3.9 years, the mean HHS was 86.02 ± 9.73. The cumulative stem survival rate was 96.6% at 60 months and 120 months (implant survival: 96.6% and 89.7%, respectively). Bone stock improved across all Gruen zones, with significant increases in zones 1, 3, and 5. No radiolucent lines were found in 59.6% of proximal femurs and 93.0% of distal femurs. More than half of the stems (54.4%) achieved the maximum Global Radiographic Score (20 / 20), and 84.2% demonstrated bone ingrowth according to the Engh criteria.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The single-taper conical revision stem provided good clinical outcomes and reliable survival rates (96.6%) at 6 and 10 years, with 93% of cases exhibiting very good stem stability.</p>","PeriodicalId":47648,"journal":{"name":"Clinics in Orthopedic Surgery","volume":"18 2","pages":"241-249"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13047398/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinics in Orthopedic Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4055/cios25006","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/3/12 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The optimal stem design for revision hip arthroplasties is still controversial. A retrospective cohort study of revision hip arthroplasties performed using a single-taper cementless conical stem was designed, aiming to assess clinical outcomes, complications and survival rates, and radiological osseointegration, at a minimum follow-up of 2 years.

Methods: A retrospective observational cohort study was conducted on 57 femoral revision arthroplasties performed between 2004 and 2018 using a cementless monoblock conical tapered stem, with a minimum 2-year follow-up. Clinical outcomes were assessed using the Harris Hip Score (HHS). Radiographic evaluations included stem alignment, bone stock remodeling across Gruen zones, and osseointegration graded using 2 systems: Global Radiographic Score (a 5-scale index combining bone quality and osseointegration) and the Engh criteria (fixation classified as bone ingrowth, stable fibrous fixation, or unstable fixation). Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was also performed.

Results: At a mean follow-up of 6.0 ± 3.9 years, the mean HHS was 86.02 ± 9.73. The cumulative stem survival rate was 96.6% at 60 months and 120 months (implant survival: 96.6% and 89.7%, respectively). Bone stock improved across all Gruen zones, with significant increases in zones 1, 3, and 5. No radiolucent lines were found in 59.6% of proximal femurs and 93.0% of distal femurs. More than half of the stems (54.4%) achieved the maximum Global Radiographic Score (20 / 20), and 84.2% demonstrated bone ingrowth according to the Engh criteria.

Conclusions: The single-taper conical revision stem provided good clinical outcomes and reliable survival rates (96.6%) at 6 and 10 years, with 93% of cases exhibiting very good stem stability.

单锥度无骨水泥锥形假体翻修髋关节置换术:57个植入物的临床和影像学评估。
背景:髋关节翻修置换术的最佳柄设计仍然存在争议。本研究设计了一项回顾性队列研究,目的是在至少2年的随访中评估翻修髋关节置换术的临床结果、并发症和生存率以及放射学骨整合。方法:回顾性观察队列研究了2004年至2018年期间使用无骨水泥单块锥形锥形柄进行的57例股骨翻修关节置换术,随访至少2年。临床结果采用Harris髋关节评分(HHS)进行评估。影像学评估包括椎体对中、格鲁恩区骨群重塑和骨整合评分,采用2个系统:Global Radiographic Score(结合骨质量和骨整合的5级指数)和Engh标准(固定分为骨长入、稳定纤维固定或不稳定固定)。Kaplan-Meier生存分析。结果:平均随访6.0±3.9年,平均HHS为86.02±9.73。60个月和120个月的累积茎存活率为96.6%(种植体存活率分别为96.6%和89.7%)。骨存量在所有格伦区均有改善,其中1区、3区和5区显著增加。59.6%的股骨近端和93.0%的股骨远端未见透光线。超过一半的骨干(54.4%)达到了最高的Global x线评分(20 / 20),84.2%根据英语标准显示骨长入。结论:单锥度锥形修补术提供了良好的临床结果和可靠的6年和10年生存率(96.6%),其中93%的病例表现出非常好的椎体稳定性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
4.00%
发文量
85
审稿时长
36 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书