Mobility On Demand: What About the Weekend?

IF 1.8 4区 工程技术 Q3 ENGINEERING, CIVIL
Transportation Research Record Pub Date : 2025-08-15 eCollection Date: 2025-11-01 DOI:10.1177/03611981251346454
Grace O Kagho, Milos Balac, Kay W Axhausen
{"title":"Mobility On Demand: What About the Weekend?","authors":"Grace O Kagho, Milos Balac, Kay W Axhausen","doi":"10.1177/03611981251346454","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Mobility on demand (MoD) services like ride-hailing, ride-sharing, and car-sharing are changing travel behavior by providing increased options and flexibility. These services can be best understood and planned for through the use of detailed computer simulations. However, existing simulations predominantly focus on modeling average working days, characterized by high and predictable travel demand. This approach overlooks the distinct travel patterns observed during weekends. Unlike weekdays, which feature pronounced peak hours, weekend travel is distributed more evenly throughout the day, particularly on Saturdays. This study compares the differences in travel demand patterns between weekends and weekdays and their possible impact on policies drawn from MoD simulations. Using an agent-based simulation framework MATSim, we simulate the introduction of an autonomous mobility on demand (aMoD) service to Zurich, Switzerland, and its environs. We then compare weekday and weekend travel patterns highlighting unique aspects of weekend travel and their implications for MoD service operations. The findings suggest that transport policies should account for the unique characteristics of weekend travel. The results provide insights into modal shifts, showing how more public transport and private vehicle trips could be replaced by MoD services during weekends, especially for long-distance travel. Furthermore, results show that optimal fleet sizes vary between weekdays and weekends owing to differences in demand. While weekends see higher MoD demand, wait times don't necessarily increase. However, longer detours for pickups may extend travel times. Accounting for weekend travel in simulations helps ensure policy planning supports reliable service while balancing wait times, travel times, occupancy, and operational costs.</p>","PeriodicalId":23279,"journal":{"name":"Transportation Research Record","volume":"2679 11","pages":"68-84"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13046270/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transportation Research Record","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/03611981251346454","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/11/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CIVIL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Mobility on demand (MoD) services like ride-hailing, ride-sharing, and car-sharing are changing travel behavior by providing increased options and flexibility. These services can be best understood and planned for through the use of detailed computer simulations. However, existing simulations predominantly focus on modeling average working days, characterized by high and predictable travel demand. This approach overlooks the distinct travel patterns observed during weekends. Unlike weekdays, which feature pronounced peak hours, weekend travel is distributed more evenly throughout the day, particularly on Saturdays. This study compares the differences in travel demand patterns between weekends and weekdays and their possible impact on policies drawn from MoD simulations. Using an agent-based simulation framework MATSim, we simulate the introduction of an autonomous mobility on demand (aMoD) service to Zurich, Switzerland, and its environs. We then compare weekday and weekend travel patterns highlighting unique aspects of weekend travel and their implications for MoD service operations. The findings suggest that transport policies should account for the unique characteristics of weekend travel. The results provide insights into modal shifts, showing how more public transport and private vehicle trips could be replaced by MoD services during weekends, especially for long-distance travel. Furthermore, results show that optimal fleet sizes vary between weekdays and weekends owing to differences in demand. While weekends see higher MoD demand, wait times don't necessarily increase. However, longer detours for pickups may extend travel times. Accounting for weekend travel in simulations helps ensure policy planning supports reliable service while balancing wait times, travel times, occupancy, and operational costs.

按需出行:周末怎么办?
叫车、拼车和汽车共享等按需出行服务通过提供更多的选择和灵活性,正在改变出行行为。通过使用详细的计算机模拟,可以最好地理解和规划这些服务。然而,现有的仿真主要集中在建模平均工作日,特点是高和可预测的旅行需求。这种方法忽略了在周末观察到的不同的旅行模式。与工作日的高峰时段不同,周末出行在一天中的分布更为均匀,尤其是在周六。本研究比较了周末和工作日出行需求模式的差异,以及它们对MoD模拟得出的政策可能产生的影响。使用基于代理的仿真框架MATSim,我们模拟了在瑞士苏黎世及其周边地区引入自动随需移动(aMoD)服务。然后,我们比较工作日和周末的旅行模式,突出周末旅行的独特方面及其对国防部服务运作的影响。研究结果表明,交通政策应该考虑到周末旅行的独特特征。研究结果提供了对交通方式转变的见解,显示了在周末,特别是长途旅行,更多的公共交通和私家车出行可以被MoD服务所取代。此外,结果表明,由于需求的差异,工作日和周末的最佳车队规模有所不同。虽然周末看到更高的MoD需求,但等待时间不一定会增加。然而,更长的接送弯路可能会延长旅行时间。在模拟中考虑周末旅行有助于确保策略规划支持可靠的服务,同时平衡等待时间、旅行时间、占用率和运营成本。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Transportation Research Record
Transportation Research Record 工程技术-工程:土木
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
11.80%
发文量
918
审稿时长
4.2 months
期刊介绍: Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board is one of the most cited and prolific transportation journals in the world, offering unparalleled depth and breadth in the coverage of transportation-related topics. The TRR publishes approximately 70 issues annually of outstanding, peer-reviewed papers presenting research findings in policy, planning, administration, economics and financing, operations, construction, design, maintenance, safety, and more, for all modes of transportation. This site provides electronic access to a full compilation of papers since the 1996 series.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书