Orthodontic and Maxillofacial Surgery Treatment in Achondroplasia for Orofacial Alterations: A Systematic Review and Preliminary Age-Stratified Guidelines
Marco Farronato, Maria Francesca Bedeschi, Cristina Grippaudo, Gianluca Martino Tartaglia, Berardo Rinaldi, Cinzia Maspero
{"title":"Orthodontic and Maxillofacial Surgery Treatment in Achondroplasia for Orofacial Alterations: A Systematic Review and Preliminary Age-Stratified Guidelines","authors":"Marco Farronato, Maria Francesca Bedeschi, Cristina Grippaudo, Gianluca Martino Tartaglia, Berardo Rinaldi, Cinzia Maspero","doi":"10.1111/ocr.70108","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This systematic review aimed to collect and appraise the clinical outcomes of all orthopaedic, orthodontic and surgical interventions in ACH patients. Following PROSPERO protocol, multiple database sources were searched to December 2024 with no language restrictions for (i) genetically confirmed ACH; (ii) any orthodontic/orthopaedic/orthognathic treatment. Two reviewers independently screened, extracted data and applied Joanna Briggs Institute appraisal tools. Results were synthesised to collect the evidence and provide available guidelines. Thirteen studies met the criteria (11 case reports, 2 case series) comprising 16 treated individuals (3–23 y.o). Five patients aged 10–16 years achieved stable correction with orthopaedic treatment followed by fixed appliances, without extractions or surgery at ≥ 24-month follow-up. Eight post-growth patients (> 16 years) required either extractions (<i>n</i> = 4) or maxillofacial surgery (<i>n</i> = 5) to attain satisfactory occlusion; long-term stability was documented in only two. Two preschool children underwent mid-face distraction and were successfully decannulated. Risk-of-bias was generally moderate. Early orthopaedic-orthodontic protocols (≤ 16 years) corrected transverse and sagittal discrepancies in ACH, whereas combined orthodontic–surgical approaches were usually indispensable after growth completion. Future prospective are essential to strengthen the evidence base age-stratified guidelines.</p><p><b>PROSPERO registration number:</b> CRD42024582720</p>","PeriodicalId":19652,"journal":{"name":"Orthodontics & Craniofacial Research","volume":"29 4","pages":"593-610"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/ocr.70108","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Orthodontics & Craniofacial Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ocr.70108","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/4/6 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This systematic review aimed to collect and appraise the clinical outcomes of all orthopaedic, orthodontic and surgical interventions in ACH patients. Following PROSPERO protocol, multiple database sources were searched to December 2024 with no language restrictions for (i) genetically confirmed ACH; (ii) any orthodontic/orthopaedic/orthognathic treatment. Two reviewers independently screened, extracted data and applied Joanna Briggs Institute appraisal tools. Results were synthesised to collect the evidence and provide available guidelines. Thirteen studies met the criteria (11 case reports, 2 case series) comprising 16 treated individuals (3–23 y.o). Five patients aged 10–16 years achieved stable correction with orthopaedic treatment followed by fixed appliances, without extractions or surgery at ≥ 24-month follow-up. Eight post-growth patients (> 16 years) required either extractions (n = 4) or maxillofacial surgery (n = 5) to attain satisfactory occlusion; long-term stability was documented in only two. Two preschool children underwent mid-face distraction and were successfully decannulated. Risk-of-bias was generally moderate. Early orthopaedic-orthodontic protocols (≤ 16 years) corrected transverse and sagittal discrepancies in ACH, whereas combined orthodontic–surgical approaches were usually indispensable after growth completion. Future prospective are essential to strengthen the evidence base age-stratified guidelines.
期刊介绍:
Orthodontics & Craniofacial Research - Genes, Growth and Development is published to serve its readers as an international forum for the presentation and critical discussion of issues pertinent to the advancement of the specialty of orthodontics and the evidence-based knowledge of craniofacial growth and development. This forum is based on scientifically supported information, but also includes minority and conflicting opinions.
The objective of the journal is to facilitate effective communication between the research community and practicing clinicians. Original papers of high scientific quality that report the findings of clinical trials, clinical epidemiology, and novel therapeutic or diagnostic approaches are appropriate submissions. Similarly, we welcome papers in genetics, developmental biology, syndromology, surgery, speech and hearing, and other biomedical disciplines related to clinical orthodontics and normal and abnormal craniofacial growth and development. In addition to original and basic research, the journal publishes concise reviews, case reports of substantial value, invited essays, letters, and announcements.
The journal is published quarterly. The review of submitted papers will be coordinated by the editor and members of the editorial board. It is policy to review manuscripts within 3 to 4 weeks of receipt and to publish within 3 to 6 months of acceptance.