Association of Glucagon-like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonists with Mortality and Aspiration Pneumonia in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes After Gastrostomy: A Target Trial Emulation Study.
{"title":"Association of Glucagon-like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonists with Mortality and Aspiration Pneumonia in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes After Gastrostomy: A Target Trial Emulation Study.","authors":"Yuan-Tsung Tseng, Chung-Hung Chen, Li-Ping Chou, Shu-Ying Chen, Huai-Yi Huang, Jyun-Wei Wang, Chung-Yi Li","doi":"10.7150/ijms.128956","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This study aimed to compare the safety and effectiveness of glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RA) versus dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors (DPP-4i) in patients with type 2 diabetes following gastrostomy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a target trial emulation using real-world data. From January 1, 2015, to December 31, 2024, we identified 728 patients who initiated either GLP-1 RA or DPP-4i after gastrostomy. After 1:1 propensity score matching to balance baseline covariates, 364 patients were included in each group. The primary analysis followed an intention-to-treat principle, and follow-up continued until June 30, 2025. Several sensitivity analyses, including landmark analysis and E-value calculation, were performed to assess the robustness of the findings.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Compared with DPP-4i initiation, GLP-1 RA initiation was associated with lower all-cause mortality (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 0.71; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.54-0.93) and aspiration pneumonia (aHR, 0.64; 95% CI, 0.44-0.93).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our findings indicate that initiation of GLP-1 RA, compared with initiation of DPP-4i, was associated with lower all-cause mortality and a lower risk of aspiration pneumonia in patients with type 2 diabetes following gastrostomy. Further prospective studies are warranted to confirm these findings in this vulnerable population.</p>","PeriodicalId":14031,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Medical Sciences","volume":"23 4","pages":"1444-1455"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13048897/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Medical Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7150/ijms.128956","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: This study aimed to compare the safety and effectiveness of glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RA) versus dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors (DPP-4i) in patients with type 2 diabetes following gastrostomy.
Methods: We conducted a target trial emulation using real-world data. From January 1, 2015, to December 31, 2024, we identified 728 patients who initiated either GLP-1 RA or DPP-4i after gastrostomy. After 1:1 propensity score matching to balance baseline covariates, 364 patients were included in each group. The primary analysis followed an intention-to-treat principle, and follow-up continued until June 30, 2025. Several sensitivity analyses, including landmark analysis and E-value calculation, were performed to assess the robustness of the findings.
Results: Compared with DPP-4i initiation, GLP-1 RA initiation was associated with lower all-cause mortality (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 0.71; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.54-0.93) and aspiration pneumonia (aHR, 0.64; 95% CI, 0.44-0.93).
Conclusions: Our findings indicate that initiation of GLP-1 RA, compared with initiation of DPP-4i, was associated with lower all-cause mortality and a lower risk of aspiration pneumonia in patients with type 2 diabetes following gastrostomy. Further prospective studies are warranted to confirm these findings in this vulnerable population.
期刊介绍:
Original research papers, reviews, and short research communications in any medical related area can be submitted to the Journal on the understanding that the work has not been published previously in whole or part and is not under consideration for publication elsewhere. Manuscripts in basic science and clinical medicine are both considered. There is no restriction on the length of research papers and reviews, although authors are encouraged to be concise. Short research communication is limited to be under 2500 words.