Evaluation of Neuromuscular Blocking Agent Utilization in Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation.

IF 2.2 3区 医学 Q2 ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL
ASAIO Journal Pub Date : 2026-09-01 Epub Date: 2026-04-06 DOI:10.1097/MAT.0000000000002708
Benjamin Hohlfelder, Xin Zou, Maureen Converse, Sudhir Krishnan
{"title":"Evaluation of Neuromuscular Blocking Agent Utilization in Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation.","authors":"Benjamin Hohlfelder, Xin Zou, Maureen Converse, Sudhir Krishnan","doi":"10.1097/MAT.0000000000002708","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Neuromuscular blocking agent (NMB) utilization has been infrequently described in patients requiring extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO). The goal of this analysis was to evaluate NMB utilization at a high-volume ECMO center. This was a retrospective cohort study of patients who required ECMO at the Cleveland Clinic between January 2022 and December 2023. NMB utilization was collected, including the agent, dose, duration (if continuous infusion), and indication. Other clinical outcomes recorded included duration of ECMO support, evidence of neuromuscular dysfunction, and hospital mortality. In total, 329 patients were evaluated, and 280 patients were included. Nearly 50% of patients received NMB during their ECMO course. Most utilization was rocuronium bolus. Continuous infusion NMB was only used in 12%. Common indications for NMB were for bedside procedures (66%), hypoxemia (9%), and ECMO low flows (6%). When used for hypoxemia or ECMO low flows, administration of NMB was associated with an improvement in partial pressure of arterial oxygen (PaO 2 ) (64 vs . 105 mm Hg, p < 0.001) and ECMO flow (2.9 vs . 4.0 L/min, p = 0.016) at 1 hour, respectively. Evidence of neuromuscular dysfunction was documented in 6% of patients. Neuromuscular blocking agent use was needed in about half of patients on ECMO, but few patients required continuous NMB.</p>","PeriodicalId":8844,"journal":{"name":"ASAIO Journal","volume":" ","pages":"781-785"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ASAIO Journal","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/MAT.0000000000002708","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/4/6 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Neuromuscular blocking agent (NMB) utilization has been infrequently described in patients requiring extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO). The goal of this analysis was to evaluate NMB utilization at a high-volume ECMO center. This was a retrospective cohort study of patients who required ECMO at the Cleveland Clinic between January 2022 and December 2023. NMB utilization was collected, including the agent, dose, duration (if continuous infusion), and indication. Other clinical outcomes recorded included duration of ECMO support, evidence of neuromuscular dysfunction, and hospital mortality. In total, 329 patients were evaluated, and 280 patients were included. Nearly 50% of patients received NMB during their ECMO course. Most utilization was rocuronium bolus. Continuous infusion NMB was only used in 12%. Common indications for NMB were for bedside procedures (66%), hypoxemia (9%), and ECMO low flows (6%). When used for hypoxemia or ECMO low flows, administration of NMB was associated with an improvement in partial pressure of arterial oxygen (PaO 2 ) (64 vs . 105 mm Hg, p < 0.001) and ECMO flow (2.9 vs . 4.0 L/min, p = 0.016) at 1 hour, respectively. Evidence of neuromuscular dysfunction was documented in 6% of patients. Neuromuscular blocking agent use was needed in about half of patients on ECMO, but few patients required continuous NMB.

神经肌肉阻滞剂在体外膜氧合中的应用评价。
神经肌肉阻滞剂(NMB)的使用在需要体外膜氧合(ECMO)的患者中很少被描述。本分析的目的是评估大容量ECMO中心NMB的使用情况。这是一项回顾性队列研究,研究对象是2022年1月至2023年12月在克利夫兰诊所接受ECMO治疗的患者。收集NMB的使用情况,包括药物、剂量、持续时间(如果持续输注)和适应症。记录的其他临床结果包括ECMO支持的持续时间、神经肌肉功能障碍的证据和住院死亡率。共评估329例患者,纳入280例患者。近50%的患者在ECMO过程中接受了NMB。应用最多的是罗库溴铵丸。持续输注NMB仅占12%。NMB的常见适应症是床边手术(66%)、低氧血症(9%)和ECMO低流量(6%)。当用于低氧血症或ECMO低流量时,NMB的管理分别与1小时动脉氧分压(PaO2) (64 vs 105 mm Hg, p < 0.001)和ECMO流量(2.9 vs 4.0 L/min, p = 0.016)的改善相关。6%的患者有神经肌肉功能障碍的证据。大约一半的ECMO患者需要使用神经肌肉阻滞剂,但很少有患者需要持续的NMB。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
ASAIO Journal
ASAIO Journal 医学-工程:生物医学
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
7.10%
发文量
651
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: ASAIO Journal is in the forefront of artificial organ research and development. On the cutting edge of innovative technology, it features peer-reviewed articles of the highest quality that describe research, development, the most recent advances in the design of artificial organ devices and findings from initial testing. Bimonthly, the ASAIO Journal features state-of-the-art investigations, laboratory and clinical trials, and discussions and opinions from experts around the world. The official publication of the American Society for Artificial Internal Organs.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书