Development and evaluation of frailty index for patients with systemic lupus erythematosus in China.

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 RHEUMATOLOGY
Lupus Pub Date : 2026-07-01 Epub Date: 2026-04-04 DOI:10.1177/09612033261438992
Meng-Yao Zhang, Mei-Qin Nie, Qian Tang, Xing-Yue Dai, Zhao-Liang Wang, Wen-Chen He, Guo-Cui Wu
{"title":"Development and evaluation of frailty index for patients with systemic lupus erythematosus in China.","authors":"Meng-Yao Zhang, Mei-Qin Nie, Qian Tang, Xing-Yue Dai, Zhao-Liang Wang, Wen-Chen He, Guo-Cui Wu","doi":"10.1177/09612033261438992","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>ObjectiveTo develop and validate a frailty assessment scale tailored for patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE).MethodsBased on the theory of the frailty integration model, an initial draft of the frailty index questionnaire was developed through a comprehensive literature review and a two - round Delphi expert consultation. The final version of the scale was formed through a pre - survey and a formal survey. The validity of the questionnaire was tested using content validity, structural validity, and criterion - related validity. The reliability was evaluated using Cronbach's <i>α</i> coefficient, split - half reliability, and test - retest reliability.ResultsThe initial item pool of the scale contained 3 dimensions and 32 items. After two rounds of Delphi expert consultations, the draft scale was refined to 21 items across 3 dimensions. Pilot testing with 50 SLE patients further reduced it to 14 items. The formal content validity Cronbach's <i>α</i> coefficient was 0.809, the split - half reliability was 0.745, the KMO was 0.820, and the Bartlett's test value was 2915.855 (<i>p</i> < 0.001). The results of exploratory factor analysis showed that, except for a few items, the correlation coefficient between the score of each item and its score in the corresponding dimension was greater than 0.4, and the overall correlation coefficient was 0.832 (<i>p</i> < 0.001). The optimal cutoff value for the pre - frailty stage was 28.5, and that for the frailty stage was 40.5.ConclusionThe frailty index scale developed in this study is a valid and reliable tool for assessing frailty in SLE patients in China, with potential utility in clinical and research settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":18044,"journal":{"name":"Lupus","volume":" ","pages":"779-788"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Lupus","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/09612033261438992","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/4/4 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RHEUMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ObjectiveTo develop and validate a frailty assessment scale tailored for patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE).MethodsBased on the theory of the frailty integration model, an initial draft of the frailty index questionnaire was developed through a comprehensive literature review and a two - round Delphi expert consultation. The final version of the scale was formed through a pre - survey and a formal survey. The validity of the questionnaire was tested using content validity, structural validity, and criterion - related validity. The reliability was evaluated using Cronbach's α coefficient, split - half reliability, and test - retest reliability.ResultsThe initial item pool of the scale contained 3 dimensions and 32 items. After two rounds of Delphi expert consultations, the draft scale was refined to 21 items across 3 dimensions. Pilot testing with 50 SLE patients further reduced it to 14 items. The formal content validity Cronbach's α coefficient was 0.809, the split - half reliability was 0.745, the KMO was 0.820, and the Bartlett's test value was 2915.855 (p < 0.001). The results of exploratory factor analysis showed that, except for a few items, the correlation coefficient between the score of each item and its score in the corresponding dimension was greater than 0.4, and the overall correlation coefficient was 0.832 (p < 0.001). The optimal cutoff value for the pre - frailty stage was 28.5, and that for the frailty stage was 40.5.ConclusionThe frailty index scale developed in this study is a valid and reliable tool for assessing frailty in SLE patients in China, with potential utility in clinical and research settings.

中国系统性红斑狼疮患者衰弱指标的制定与评价。
目的开发并验证系统性红斑狼疮(SLE)患者的虚弱评估量表。方法以脆弱性整合模型理论为基础,通过文献综述和两轮德尔菲专家咨询,编制脆弱性指数问卷初稿。量表的最终版本是通过预调查和正式调查形成的。问卷的效度采用内容效度、结构效度和标准相关效度进行检验。信度采用Cronbach′s α系数、半分信度和重测信度进行评价。结果量表初始题库包含3个维度32个题库。经过两轮德尔菲专家咨询,将量表草案细化为3个维度的21个项目。对50例SLE患者的初步试验进一步将其减少到14项。形式内容效度Cronbach’s α系数为0.809,分半信度为0.745,KMO为0.820,Bartlett检验值为2915.855 (p < 0.001)。探索性因子分析结果显示,除少数项目外,各项目得分与其相应维度得分的相关系数均大于0.4,总体相关系数为0.832 (p < 0.001)。衰弱前期的最佳临界值为28.5,衰弱期的最佳临界值为40.5。结论本研究开发的衰弱指数量表是评估中国SLE患者衰弱的有效、可靠的工具,在临床和研究中具有潜在的实用性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Lupus
Lupus 医学-风湿病学
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
11.50%
发文量
225
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: The only fully peer reviewed international journal devoted exclusively to lupus (and related disease) research. Lupus includes the most promising new clinical and laboratory-based studies from leading specialists in all lupus-related disciplines. Invaluable reading, with extended coverage, lupus-related disciplines include: Rheumatology, Dermatology, Immunology, Obstetrics, Psychiatry and Cardiovascular Research…
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书