Comparison of clinical outcomes between biodegradable polymer sirolimus-eluting stents and durable polymer everolimus-eluting stents in octogenarian patients
{"title":"Comparison of clinical outcomes between biodegradable polymer sirolimus-eluting stents and durable polymer everolimus-eluting stents in octogenarian patients","authors":"Masaki Kushi MD, Yuichi Ozaki MD, PhD, FJCC, Keiya Komatsu MD, Ryo Hikida MD, Kenichi Komukai MD, PhD, Yosuke Katayama MD, PhD, Keisuke Satogami MD, PhD, Masahiro Takahata MD, PhD, Teruaki Wada MD, PhD, Manabu Kashiwagi MD, PhD, Yasutsugu Shiono MD, PhD, Akio Kuroi MD, PhD, Takashi Yamano MD, PhD, Takashi Tanimoto MD, PhD, FJCC, Shintaro Kuki MD, PhD, Yasushi Ino MD, PhD, Yasushi Hayashi MD, Hironori Kitabata MD, PhD, FJCC, Atsushi Tanaka MD, PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.jjcc.2026.03.015","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Biodegradable polymer sirolimus-eluting stents (BP-SESs) have provided similar clinical outcomes including cardiac death, myocardial infarction (MI), and target lesion revascularization to second-generation durable polymer everolimus-eluting stents (DP-EESs). However, safety and efficacy of BP-SES in patients aged ≥80 years remain unknown. The aim of this study was to investigate the 1-year clinical outcomes between BP-SES and DP-EES in patients aged ≥80 years.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We retrospectively analyzed 213 patients aged ≥80 years who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with BP-SES or DP-EES between April 2020 and March 2022. The primary endpoint was a 1-year composite of all-cause death, MI, target vessel revascularization (TVR), cerebrovascular accident (CVA), and definite or probable stent thrombosis (ST). To minimize stent selection bias, propensity score matching was conducted. Multivariable logistic regression was used to identify factors associated with the 1-year primary endpoint in the matched cohort.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Among 213 patients treated with BP-SES (<em>n</em> = 93) and DP-EES (<em>n</em> = 120), the 1-year rates of MI, TVR, CVA, ST, and bleeding events were similar between the two groups. After propensity score matching, 1-year event-free survival for the primary endpoint was similar between the BP-SES and DP-EES groups [hazard ratio, 0.893; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.345–2.315; <em>p</em> = 0.816]. Multivariable analysis demonstrated that acute coronary syndrome [odds ratio (OR), 3.478; 95% CI, 1.019–14.190; <em>p</em> = 0.047] was independently associated with a higher incidence of the 1-year primary endpoint, whereas angiographic success (OR, 0.058; 95% CI, 0.008–0.347; <em>p</em> = 0.002) and angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor or angiotensin II type 1 receptor blocker use at discharge (OR, 0.229; 95% CI, 0.057–0.858; <em>p</em> = 0.029) were independently associated with a lower incidence.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>In patients aged ≥80 years, 1-year clinical outcomes after PCI with BP-SES were generally consistent with those with DP-EES.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":15223,"journal":{"name":"Journal of cardiology","volume":"88 2","pages":"Pages 123-128"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of cardiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0914508726000717","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/4/2 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background
Biodegradable polymer sirolimus-eluting stents (BP-SESs) have provided similar clinical outcomes including cardiac death, myocardial infarction (MI), and target lesion revascularization to second-generation durable polymer everolimus-eluting stents (DP-EESs). However, safety and efficacy of BP-SES in patients aged ≥80 years remain unknown. The aim of this study was to investigate the 1-year clinical outcomes between BP-SES and DP-EES in patients aged ≥80 years.
Methods
We retrospectively analyzed 213 patients aged ≥80 years who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with BP-SES or DP-EES between April 2020 and March 2022. The primary endpoint was a 1-year composite of all-cause death, MI, target vessel revascularization (TVR), cerebrovascular accident (CVA), and definite or probable stent thrombosis (ST). To minimize stent selection bias, propensity score matching was conducted. Multivariable logistic regression was used to identify factors associated with the 1-year primary endpoint in the matched cohort.
Results
Among 213 patients treated with BP-SES (n = 93) and DP-EES (n = 120), the 1-year rates of MI, TVR, CVA, ST, and bleeding events were similar between the two groups. After propensity score matching, 1-year event-free survival for the primary endpoint was similar between the BP-SES and DP-EES groups [hazard ratio, 0.893; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.345–2.315; p = 0.816]. Multivariable analysis demonstrated that acute coronary syndrome [odds ratio (OR), 3.478; 95% CI, 1.019–14.190; p = 0.047] was independently associated with a higher incidence of the 1-year primary endpoint, whereas angiographic success (OR, 0.058; 95% CI, 0.008–0.347; p = 0.002) and angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor or angiotensin II type 1 receptor blocker use at discharge (OR, 0.229; 95% CI, 0.057–0.858; p = 0.029) were independently associated with a lower incidence.
Conclusions
In patients aged ≥80 years, 1-year clinical outcomes after PCI with BP-SES were generally consistent with those with DP-EES.
期刊介绍:
The official journal of the Japanese College of Cardiology is an international, English language, peer-reviewed journal publishing the latest findings in cardiovascular medicine. Journal of Cardiology (JC) aims to publish the highest-quality material covering original basic and clinical research on all aspects of cardiovascular disease. Topics covered include ischemic heart disease, cardiomyopathy, valvular heart disease, vascular disease, hypertension, arrhythmia, congenital heart disease, pharmacological and non-pharmacological treatment, new diagnostic techniques, and cardiovascular imaging. JC also publishes a selection of review articles, clinical trials, short communications, and important messages and letters to the editor.