Research on the Optimized Layout of Boreholes in Low-Permeability Coal Seams to Eliminate Gas Drainage Blank Zones

IF 1.2 4区 地球科学 Q3 GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS
Geofluids Pub Date : 2026-03-28 DOI:10.1155/gfl/7298808
Jingjing Huo, Hao Sun, Xiaofeng Jiang
{"title":"Research on the Optimized Layout of Boreholes in Low-Permeability Coal Seams to Eliminate Gas Drainage Blank Zones","authors":"Jingjing Huo,&nbsp;Hao Sun,&nbsp;Xiaofeng Jiang","doi":"10.1155/gfl/7298808","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>With the increasing depth and complexity of coal mining in China, the gas control in coal seam has become increasingly important. Gas predrainage through boreholes is an effective means of gas control, and the effective drainage radius of boreholes is a significant index for gas drainage. Taking Sijiazhuang Coal Mine as the research object, the gas drainage radius of seam 15 at different drainage times have been measured. A gas–solid coupling model for coalbed gas drainage has been established by governing equations between porosity, permeability, stress, and seepage, which was applied to optimize the layout of coalbed gas drainage boreholes. The results show that the drainage radius of conventional boreholes in Sijiazhuang Coal Mine increases with time, namely, 3.0, 4.0, 4.4, and 5.0 m on 35, 70, 100, and 120 days, respectively. The model validation results are consistent with the field measured values, confirming the feasibility of the established model in simulating gas drainage effectiveness. When the borehole spacing is less than or equal to 3 m, the effective drainage rate reaches 100% with no blind zones; when the spacing is greater than or equal to 3.5 m, the effective drainage rate drops below 82.7% and blind zones appear. Therefore, the optimal spacing should be controlled within 3 m. The comparison of layout patterns shows that under the same number of boreholes, the double-row staggered (three-flower) layout has a larger negative pressure acting area and more uniform pressure reduction in the roof and floor compared with the single-row layout, with the time to meet standards shortened from 58 to 55 days, significantly improving the drainage efficiency.</p>","PeriodicalId":12512,"journal":{"name":"Geofluids","volume":"2026 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1155/gfl/7298808","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geofluids","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1155/gfl/7298808","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

With the increasing depth and complexity of coal mining in China, the gas control in coal seam has become increasingly important. Gas predrainage through boreholes is an effective means of gas control, and the effective drainage radius of boreholes is a significant index for gas drainage. Taking Sijiazhuang Coal Mine as the research object, the gas drainage radius of seam 15 at different drainage times have been measured. A gas–solid coupling model for coalbed gas drainage has been established by governing equations between porosity, permeability, stress, and seepage, which was applied to optimize the layout of coalbed gas drainage boreholes. The results show that the drainage radius of conventional boreholes in Sijiazhuang Coal Mine increases with time, namely, 3.0, 4.0, 4.4, and 5.0 m on 35, 70, 100, and 120 days, respectively. The model validation results are consistent with the field measured values, confirming the feasibility of the established model in simulating gas drainage effectiveness. When the borehole spacing is less than or equal to 3 m, the effective drainage rate reaches 100% with no blind zones; when the spacing is greater than or equal to 3.5 m, the effective drainage rate drops below 82.7% and blind zones appear. Therefore, the optimal spacing should be controlled within 3 m. The comparison of layout patterns shows that under the same number of boreholes, the double-row staggered (three-flower) layout has a larger negative pressure acting area and more uniform pressure reduction in the roof and floor compared with the single-row layout, with the time to meet standards shortened from 58 to 55 days, significantly improving the drainage efficiency.

Abstract Image

低渗煤层消除瓦斯抽放空白区的钻孔优化布置研究
随着中国煤矿开采深度和复杂性的不断增加,煤层瓦斯控制变得越来越重要。钻孔预抽瓦斯是瓦斯控制的有效手段,钻孔有效抽放半径是瓦斯抽放的重要指标。以四家庄煤矿为研究对象,测量了15煤层在不同抽放次数下的瓦斯抽放半径。通过孔隙度、渗透率、应力和渗流控制方程,建立了煤层气抽采气固耦合模型,并将其应用于煤层气抽采钻孔布置优化。结果表明:四家庄煤矿常规钻孔排水半径随时间增大,在35、70、100、120 d分别为3.0、4.0、4.4、5.0 m;模型验证结果与现场实测值吻合较好,证实了所建模型在模拟瓦斯抽采效果方面的可行性。当井距小于等于3 m时,有效泄油率达到100%,无盲区;当间距大于等于3.5 m时,有效排水率降至82.7%以下,出现盲区;因此,最优间距应控制在3m以内。布置方式对比表明,相同钻孔数下,双排交错(三花)布置比单排布置具有更大的负压作用面积,顶板降压更均匀,达标时间由58天缩短至55天,排水效率显著提高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Geofluids
Geofluids 地学-地球化学与地球物理
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
17.60%
发文量
835
期刊介绍: Geofluids is a peer-reviewed, Open Access journal that provides a forum for original research and reviews relating to the role of fluids in mineralogical, chemical, and structural evolution of the Earth’s crust. Its explicit aim is to disseminate ideas across the range of sub-disciplines in which Geofluids research is carried out. To this end, authors are encouraged to stress the transdisciplinary relevance and international ramifications of their research. Authors are also encouraged to make their work as accessible as possible to readers from other sub-disciplines. Geofluids emphasizes chemical, microbial, and physical aspects of subsurface fluids throughout the Earth’s crust. Geofluids spans studies of groundwater, terrestrial or submarine geothermal fluids, basinal brines, petroleum, metamorphic waters or magmatic fluids.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书