Groundwater Contributions to Daily Nitrogen and Phosphorus Loads and Implications for Prediction in Watersheds in South Korea

IF 2.2 4区 环境科学与生态学 Q3 ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL
Bisrat Ayalew Yifru, Seoro Lee, Jeongho Han, Woonji Park, Kyoung Jae Lim
{"title":"Groundwater Contributions to Daily Nitrogen and Phosphorus Loads and Implications for Prediction in Watersheds in South Korea","authors":"Bisrat Ayalew Yifru,&nbsp;Seoro Lee,&nbsp;Jeongho Han,&nbsp;Woonji Park,&nbsp;Kyoung Jae Lim","doi":"10.1111/1752-1688.70106","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Understanding watershed water quality dynamics is essential for sustainable management, yet accurate nutrient load prediction remains challenging under strong inter-annual variability. To address this limitation, this study presents a hybrid modelling framework that integrates baseflow information into a machine-learning structure to improve nutrient load prediction. By separating and quantifying baseflow contributions, the proposed approach provides a process-informed foundation for data-driven prediction. We employed a conventional Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) model as a baseline and developed a hybrid model incorporating baseflow nutrient load contribution. In addition, the limitations of applying conventional environmental models in watersheds with strong seasonality were explored. The results show that the hybrid approach significantly outperformed the standard LSTM and process-based models. The benchmark LSTM model exhibited a percentage bias (PBIAS) of −3.08% to −126.57% and a Nash-Sutcliffe Efficiency (NSE) of 0.13–0.95. The hybrid models reduced PBIAS to −1.88% to 47.21% and increased NSE to 0.66–0.99. Notably, this improvement was pronounced during wet seasons, indicating that incorporating baseflow information strengthens prediction accuracy at peak flow conditions. These findings demonstrate that accounting for baseflow contributions enhances nutrient load prediction in machine-learning frameworks, particularly in watersheds with high hydrological variability.</p>","PeriodicalId":17234,"journal":{"name":"Journal of The American Water Resources Association","volume":"62 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/1752-1688.70106","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of The American Water Resources Association","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1752-1688.70106","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Understanding watershed water quality dynamics is essential for sustainable management, yet accurate nutrient load prediction remains challenging under strong inter-annual variability. To address this limitation, this study presents a hybrid modelling framework that integrates baseflow information into a machine-learning structure to improve nutrient load prediction. By separating and quantifying baseflow contributions, the proposed approach provides a process-informed foundation for data-driven prediction. We employed a conventional Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) model as a baseline and developed a hybrid model incorporating baseflow nutrient load contribution. In addition, the limitations of applying conventional environmental models in watersheds with strong seasonality were explored. The results show that the hybrid approach significantly outperformed the standard LSTM and process-based models. The benchmark LSTM model exhibited a percentage bias (PBIAS) of −3.08% to −126.57% and a Nash-Sutcliffe Efficiency (NSE) of 0.13–0.95. The hybrid models reduced PBIAS to −1.88% to 47.21% and increased NSE to 0.66–0.99. Notably, this improvement was pronounced during wet seasons, indicating that incorporating baseflow information strengthens prediction accuracy at peak flow conditions. These findings demonstrate that accounting for baseflow contributions enhances nutrient load prediction in machine-learning frameworks, particularly in watersheds with high hydrological variability.

Abstract Image

地下水对韩国流域日氮磷负荷的贡献及其预测意义
了解流域水质动态对可持续管理至关重要,但在年际变化较大的情况下,准确的养分负荷预测仍然具有挑战性。为了解决这一限制,本研究提出了一种混合建模框架,该框架将基流信息集成到机器学习结构中,以改进养分负荷预测。通过分离和量化基流贡献,提出的方法为数据驱动的预测提供了一个过程知情的基础。我们采用传统的长短期记忆(LSTM)模型作为基线,并开发了一个包含基流养分负荷贡献的混合模型。此外,还探讨了传统环境模型在季节性强流域应用的局限性。结果表明,混合方法明显优于标准LSTM和基于过程的模型。基准LSTM模型的百分比偏差(PBIAS)为- 3.08%至- 126.57%,Nash-Sutcliffe效率(NSE)为0.13-0.95。混合模型将PBIAS降低至- 1.88% ~ 47.21%,将NSE提高至0.66 ~ 0.99。值得注意的是,这种改善在雨季明显,表明结合基流信息增强了峰值流量条件下的预测精度。这些发现表明,考虑基流贡献可以增强机器学习框架中的养分负荷预测,特别是在水文变异性高的流域。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of The American Water Resources Association
Journal of The American Water Resources Association 环境科学-地球科学综合
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
12.50%
发文量
100
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: JAWRA seeks to be the preeminent scholarly publication on multidisciplinary water resources issues. JAWRA papers present ideas derived from multiple disciplines woven together to give insight into a critical water issue, or are based primarily upon a single discipline with important applications to other disciplines. Papers often cover the topics of recent AWRA conferences such as riparian ecology, geographic information systems, adaptive management, and water policy. JAWRA authors present work within their disciplinary fields to a broader audience. Our Associate Editors and reviewers reflect this diversity to ensure a knowledgeable and fair review of a broad range of topics. We particularly encourage submissions of papers which impart a ''take home message'' our readers can use.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书