{"title":"Not an event but a process: challenging common misconceptions in subalpine forest decline","authors":"Dajeong Choi, Hyeon-Ho Myeong, Cheongok Jeon","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolind.2026.114745","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Extreme weather events (EWEs) are widely recognized as key drivers of ecological change because of their immediate and significant impacts. However, to date, most studies have focused on a most recent event, neglecting the history of EWEs which could reveal accumulated long-term climatic stress. In contrast to EWEs, Climate extremes (CEs) offer prolonged perspective that could address the limitations of a single EWE-based explanation for the abrupt decline of subalpine forest.</div><div>Here, using the recent subalpine forest decline and climatic dataset in Korea, we identified multiple EWEs occurring prior to dieback. Past EWEs had higher intensity and longer duration than the most recent EWE, suggesting that an EWE itself had limitations in explaining the whole decline process. We therefore propose a novel conceptual framework, which addresses abrupt forest decline with accumulated climatic exposures from CE and response detection threshold. Our conceptual framework explains how abrupt-delayed response is detected through various methods such as remote sensing and dendrometer.</div><div>In conclusion, CE represents one of the primary drivers of subalpine forest decline and offers an alternative explanation for abrupt dieback events that the latest EWE alone struggles to account for. Further research quantifying detection thresholds of indicators with frequency, intensity and duration of EWE will improve forecasting and management of subalpine forests under increasing climate variability.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11459,"journal":{"name":"Ecological Indicators","volume":"185 ","pages":"Article 114745"},"PeriodicalIF":8.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecological Indicators","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1470160X26001421","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/3/24 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Extreme weather events (EWEs) are widely recognized as key drivers of ecological change because of their immediate and significant impacts. However, to date, most studies have focused on a most recent event, neglecting the history of EWEs which could reveal accumulated long-term climatic stress. In contrast to EWEs, Climate extremes (CEs) offer prolonged perspective that could address the limitations of a single EWE-based explanation for the abrupt decline of subalpine forest.
Here, using the recent subalpine forest decline and climatic dataset in Korea, we identified multiple EWEs occurring prior to dieback. Past EWEs had higher intensity and longer duration than the most recent EWE, suggesting that an EWE itself had limitations in explaining the whole decline process. We therefore propose a novel conceptual framework, which addresses abrupt forest decline with accumulated climatic exposures from CE and response detection threshold. Our conceptual framework explains how abrupt-delayed response is detected through various methods such as remote sensing and dendrometer.
In conclusion, CE represents one of the primary drivers of subalpine forest decline and offers an alternative explanation for abrupt dieback events that the latest EWE alone struggles to account for. Further research quantifying detection thresholds of indicators with frequency, intensity and duration of EWE will improve forecasting and management of subalpine forests under increasing climate variability.
期刊介绍:
The ultimate aim of Ecological Indicators is to integrate the monitoring and assessment of ecological and environmental indicators with management practices. The journal provides a forum for the discussion of the applied scientific development and review of traditional indicator approaches as well as for theoretical, modelling and quantitative applications such as index development. Research into the following areas will be published.
• All aspects of ecological and environmental indicators and indices.
• New indicators, and new approaches and methods for indicator development, testing and use.
• Development and modelling of indices, e.g. application of indicator suites across multiple scales and resources.
• Analysis and research of resource, system- and scale-specific indicators.
• Methods for integration of social and other valuation metrics for the production of scientifically rigorous and politically-relevant assessments using indicator-based monitoring and assessment programs.
• How research indicators can be transformed into direct application for management purposes.
• Broader assessment objectives and methods, e.g. biodiversity, biological integrity, and sustainability, through the use of indicators.
• Resource-specific indicators such as landscape, agroecosystems, forests, wetlands, etc.