Katherine E. Richardson , Shelby L. Sullivan , Robert T. Meyer , Lisa E. Mills , Lucas Pittman
{"title":"Exploring the application potential of ecoacoustic indices as a rapid assessment tool of avian species richness in southeastern pine forests","authors":"Katherine E. Richardson , Shelby L. Sullivan , Robert T. Meyer , Lisa E. Mills , Lucas Pittman","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolind.2026.114802","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The efficacy of using ecoacoustic indices as a rapid assessment tool of the avian community has yet to be studied in southeastern pine forests. Here we use a passive recording method and information theoretic approach to explore whether the Acoustic Complexity Index (ACI) and Normalized Difference Soundscape Index (NDSI) vary in relation to avian species richness and factors considered to influence species richness. We also examine how patterns change depending on time-scale (seasonal average per hour versus seasonal average) and test whether these indices vary in relation to species connectedness of a site. Seasonal average ACI and NDSI did not change significantly with management actions (i.e., supplemental feeding, snag retention and prescribed burn recency), though management actions were included in the best-supported models. Anthrophony was included in the best models regardless of time-scale for both ACI and NDSI and had a significant, nonlinear effect on hourly average ACI depending on season. In general, there were nuanced differences in how ACI and NDSI related to factors thought to influence species richness, and the relationship to these variables depended on the timescale of analysis. Neither ACI nor NDSI related to the cooccurrence of indicator species or breeding season avian species richness. However, we found NDSI to be most consistent among highly connected recording sites that share many species with many of the other recording sites. Our results provide new insights into the application potential of ecoacoustic indices in southeastern pine forests.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11459,"journal":{"name":"Ecological Indicators","volume":"185 ","pages":"Article 114802"},"PeriodicalIF":8.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecological Indicators","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1470160X26002025","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The efficacy of using ecoacoustic indices as a rapid assessment tool of the avian community has yet to be studied in southeastern pine forests. Here we use a passive recording method and information theoretic approach to explore whether the Acoustic Complexity Index (ACI) and Normalized Difference Soundscape Index (NDSI) vary in relation to avian species richness and factors considered to influence species richness. We also examine how patterns change depending on time-scale (seasonal average per hour versus seasonal average) and test whether these indices vary in relation to species connectedness of a site. Seasonal average ACI and NDSI did not change significantly with management actions (i.e., supplemental feeding, snag retention and prescribed burn recency), though management actions were included in the best-supported models. Anthrophony was included in the best models regardless of time-scale for both ACI and NDSI and had a significant, nonlinear effect on hourly average ACI depending on season. In general, there were nuanced differences in how ACI and NDSI related to factors thought to influence species richness, and the relationship to these variables depended on the timescale of analysis. Neither ACI nor NDSI related to the cooccurrence of indicator species or breeding season avian species richness. However, we found NDSI to be most consistent among highly connected recording sites that share many species with many of the other recording sites. Our results provide new insights into the application potential of ecoacoustic indices in southeastern pine forests.
期刊介绍:
The ultimate aim of Ecological Indicators is to integrate the monitoring and assessment of ecological and environmental indicators with management practices. The journal provides a forum for the discussion of the applied scientific development and review of traditional indicator approaches as well as for theoretical, modelling and quantitative applications such as index development. Research into the following areas will be published.
• All aspects of ecological and environmental indicators and indices.
• New indicators, and new approaches and methods for indicator development, testing and use.
• Development and modelling of indices, e.g. application of indicator suites across multiple scales and resources.
• Analysis and research of resource, system- and scale-specific indicators.
• Methods for integration of social and other valuation metrics for the production of scientifically rigorous and politically-relevant assessments using indicator-based monitoring and assessment programs.
• How research indicators can be transformed into direct application for management purposes.
• Broader assessment objectives and methods, e.g. biodiversity, biological integrity, and sustainability, through the use of indicators.
• Resource-specific indicators such as landscape, agroecosystems, forests, wetlands, etc.