Exploring the application potential of ecoacoustic indices as a rapid assessment tool of avian species richness in southeastern pine forests

IF 8.7 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Katherine E. Richardson , Shelby L. Sullivan , Robert T. Meyer , Lisa E. Mills , Lucas Pittman
{"title":"Exploring the application potential of ecoacoustic indices as a rapid assessment tool of avian species richness in southeastern pine forests","authors":"Katherine E. Richardson ,&nbsp;Shelby L. Sullivan ,&nbsp;Robert T. Meyer ,&nbsp;Lisa E. Mills ,&nbsp;Lucas Pittman","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolind.2026.114802","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The efficacy of using ecoacoustic indices as a rapid assessment tool of the avian community has yet to be studied in southeastern pine forests. Here we use a passive recording method and information theoretic approach to explore whether the Acoustic Complexity Index (ACI) and Normalized Difference Soundscape Index (NDSI) vary in relation to avian species richness and factors considered to influence species richness. We also examine how patterns change depending on time-scale (seasonal average per hour versus seasonal average) and test whether these indices vary in relation to species connectedness of a site. Seasonal average ACI and NDSI did not change significantly with management actions (i.e., supplemental feeding, snag retention and prescribed burn recency), though management actions were included in the best-supported models. Anthrophony was included in the best models regardless of time-scale for both ACI and NDSI and had a significant, nonlinear effect on hourly average ACI depending on season. In general, there were nuanced differences in how ACI and NDSI related to factors thought to influence species richness, and the relationship to these variables depended on the timescale of analysis. Neither ACI nor NDSI related to the cooccurrence of indicator species or breeding season avian species richness. However, we found NDSI to be most consistent among highly connected recording sites that share many species with many of the other recording sites. Our results provide new insights into the application potential of ecoacoustic indices in southeastern pine forests.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11459,"journal":{"name":"Ecological Indicators","volume":"185 ","pages":"Article 114802"},"PeriodicalIF":8.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecological Indicators","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1470160X26002025","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The efficacy of using ecoacoustic indices as a rapid assessment tool of the avian community has yet to be studied in southeastern pine forests. Here we use a passive recording method and information theoretic approach to explore whether the Acoustic Complexity Index (ACI) and Normalized Difference Soundscape Index (NDSI) vary in relation to avian species richness and factors considered to influence species richness. We also examine how patterns change depending on time-scale (seasonal average per hour versus seasonal average) and test whether these indices vary in relation to species connectedness of a site. Seasonal average ACI and NDSI did not change significantly with management actions (i.e., supplemental feeding, snag retention and prescribed burn recency), though management actions were included in the best-supported models. Anthrophony was included in the best models regardless of time-scale for both ACI and NDSI and had a significant, nonlinear effect on hourly average ACI depending on season. In general, there were nuanced differences in how ACI and NDSI related to factors thought to influence species richness, and the relationship to these variables depended on the timescale of analysis. Neither ACI nor NDSI related to the cooccurrence of indicator species or breeding season avian species richness. However, we found NDSI to be most consistent among highly connected recording sites that share many species with many of the other recording sites. Our results provide new insights into the application potential of ecoacoustic indices in southeastern pine forests.
探讨生态声学指数作为东南松林鸟类物种丰富度快速评价工具的应用潜力
利用生态声学指标作为鸟类群落快速评价工具在东南松林的有效性尚待研究。本文采用被动记录方法和信息论方法,探讨了鸟类物种丰富度和影响物种丰富度的因素对声学复杂性指数(ACI)和归一化差声景观指数(NDSI)的影响。我们还研究了模式如何随时间尺度(每小时季节平均值与季节平均值)而变化,并测试了这些指数是否与一个站点的物种连通性有关。季节平均ACI和NDSI没有随着管理措施(即补充饲喂、阻滞保留和规定的烧伤近期)而显著变化,尽管管理措施包括在最佳支持模型中。无论时间尺度如何,ACI和NDSI的最佳模型都包含了人为干扰,并且随季节对小时平均ACI有显著的非线性影响。总体而言,ACI和NDSI与影响物种丰富度的因素之间存在细微差异,并且与这些变量的关系取决于分析的时间尺度。ACI和NDSI与指示种共发生和繁殖季节鸟类物种丰富度无关。然而,我们发现NDSI在与许多其他记录点共享许多物种的高度连接的记录点中是最一致的。研究结果为生态声学指标在东南松林的应用潜力提供了新的认识。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Ecological Indicators
Ecological Indicators 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
11.80
自引率
8.70%
发文量
1163
审稿时长
78 days
期刊介绍: The ultimate aim of Ecological Indicators is to integrate the monitoring and assessment of ecological and environmental indicators with management practices. The journal provides a forum for the discussion of the applied scientific development and review of traditional indicator approaches as well as for theoretical, modelling and quantitative applications such as index development. Research into the following areas will be published. • All aspects of ecological and environmental indicators and indices. • New indicators, and new approaches and methods for indicator development, testing and use. • Development and modelling of indices, e.g. application of indicator suites across multiple scales and resources. • Analysis and research of resource, system- and scale-specific indicators. • Methods for integration of social and other valuation metrics for the production of scientifically rigorous and politically-relevant assessments using indicator-based monitoring and assessment programs. • How research indicators can be transformed into direct application for management purposes. • Broader assessment objectives and methods, e.g. biodiversity, biological integrity, and sustainability, through the use of indicators. • Resource-specific indicators such as landscape, agroecosystems, forests, wetlands, etc.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书