Spatiotemporal patterns of drought-driven mechanism transition in the mu us Sandy land: A multi-scale observational perspective based on vegetation dynamics
Xue Shang , Zhaoquan He , Wenbo Chen , Xiukang Wang , Yingying Xing , Xiaoze Jin
{"title":"Spatiotemporal patterns of drought-driven mechanism transition in the mu us Sandy land: A multi-scale observational perspective based on vegetation dynamics","authors":"Xue Shang , Zhaoquan He , Wenbo Chen , Xiukang Wang , Yingying Xing , Xiaoze Jin","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolind.2026.114832","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study investigates a potential transition in vegetation drought-driving mechanisms within arid and semi-arid regions—from traditional water-supply dominance toward growing atmospheric-demand dominance. Focusing on China's Mu Us Sandy Land (2000−2022), we characterise this transition's spatiotemporal dynamics using multi-source remote sensing data integrated with Theil-Sen trend analysis, Mann-Kendall change detection, moving window regression, and spatial autocorrelation. The key findings are as follows: (1) Significant vegetation greening occurred (NDVI increased at 95.7% of sites), concurrently with stable water supply (SPI) and intensifying atmospheric aridity. This ‘greening-while-drying’ pattern challenges traditional water-supply-centric models. (2) Moving window regression identified a critical transition circa 2012, during which the dominance of the evaporative demand drought index (EDDI) strengthened markedly. By 2016, a new regional steady-state had emerged, signifying a gradual transition from “water supply limitation” to “water demand limitation”. (3) Spatial differentiation was pronounced: atmospheric demand-driven zones (26.4%) formed patchy clusters in central-eastern and southern low-elevation areas, while water supply-driven zones (11.2%) were dispersed in eastern and southern regions. (4) Land use and topography jointly moderated this pattern. Forests exhibited the highest sensitivity to atmospheric drought (55.6% atmosphere-driven), in contrast to the more resilient grasslands. Low-elevation areas proved more vulnerable to atmospheric drought stress. The absence of “Coordinated Improvement” and “Water-Limited Degradation” types provides supporting evidence for the mechanism transition, corroborating that historical vegetation degradation is linked to atmospheric drought rather than precipitation decline. These findings necessitate a strategic reorientation in arid-land management: moving from pursuing vegetation coverage alone toward building climate-resilient ecosystems adapted to the “demand-dominant” paradigm.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11459,"journal":{"name":"Ecological Indicators","volume":"185 ","pages":"Article 114832"},"PeriodicalIF":8.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecological Indicators","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1470160X26002323","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/4/3 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This study investigates a potential transition in vegetation drought-driving mechanisms within arid and semi-arid regions—from traditional water-supply dominance toward growing atmospheric-demand dominance. Focusing on China's Mu Us Sandy Land (2000−2022), we characterise this transition's spatiotemporal dynamics using multi-source remote sensing data integrated with Theil-Sen trend analysis, Mann-Kendall change detection, moving window regression, and spatial autocorrelation. The key findings are as follows: (1) Significant vegetation greening occurred (NDVI increased at 95.7% of sites), concurrently with stable water supply (SPI) and intensifying atmospheric aridity. This ‘greening-while-drying’ pattern challenges traditional water-supply-centric models. (2) Moving window regression identified a critical transition circa 2012, during which the dominance of the evaporative demand drought index (EDDI) strengthened markedly. By 2016, a new regional steady-state had emerged, signifying a gradual transition from “water supply limitation” to “water demand limitation”. (3) Spatial differentiation was pronounced: atmospheric demand-driven zones (26.4%) formed patchy clusters in central-eastern and southern low-elevation areas, while water supply-driven zones (11.2%) were dispersed in eastern and southern regions. (4) Land use and topography jointly moderated this pattern. Forests exhibited the highest sensitivity to atmospheric drought (55.6% atmosphere-driven), in contrast to the more resilient grasslands. Low-elevation areas proved more vulnerable to atmospheric drought stress. The absence of “Coordinated Improvement” and “Water-Limited Degradation” types provides supporting evidence for the mechanism transition, corroborating that historical vegetation degradation is linked to atmospheric drought rather than precipitation decline. These findings necessitate a strategic reorientation in arid-land management: moving from pursuing vegetation coverage alone toward building climate-resilient ecosystems adapted to the “demand-dominant” paradigm.
期刊介绍:
The ultimate aim of Ecological Indicators is to integrate the monitoring and assessment of ecological and environmental indicators with management practices. The journal provides a forum for the discussion of the applied scientific development and review of traditional indicator approaches as well as for theoretical, modelling and quantitative applications such as index development. Research into the following areas will be published.
• All aspects of ecological and environmental indicators and indices.
• New indicators, and new approaches and methods for indicator development, testing and use.
• Development and modelling of indices, e.g. application of indicator suites across multiple scales and resources.
• Analysis and research of resource, system- and scale-specific indicators.
• Methods for integration of social and other valuation metrics for the production of scientifically rigorous and politically-relevant assessments using indicator-based monitoring and assessment programs.
• How research indicators can be transformed into direct application for management purposes.
• Broader assessment objectives and methods, e.g. biodiversity, biological integrity, and sustainability, through the use of indicators.
• Resource-specific indicators such as landscape, agroecosystems, forests, wetlands, etc.