Laparoscopic versus open minor liver resections of colorectal cancer liver metastases in a state at war: A prospective cohort study

IF 1.7 Q3 SURGERY
Surgery open science Pub Date : 2026-04-01 Epub Date: 2026-03-20 DOI:10.1016/j.sopen.2026.03.006
Anton Burlaka , Serhii Zemskov , Veronika Rozhkova , Vitaliy Zvirych , Mykhailo Dupyk , Andrii Beznosenko , Volodymyr Bezverkhnyi , Volodymyr Skyba
{"title":"Laparoscopic versus open minor liver resections of colorectal cancer liver metastases in a state at war: A prospective cohort study","authors":"Anton Burlaka ,&nbsp;Serhii Zemskov ,&nbsp;Veronika Rozhkova ,&nbsp;Vitaliy Zvirych ,&nbsp;Mykhailo Dupyk ,&nbsp;Andrii Beznosenko ,&nbsp;Volodymyr Bezverkhnyi ,&nbsp;Volodymyr Skyba","doi":"10.1016/j.sopen.2026.03.006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>In 2017 the laparoscopic left lateral sectionectomy and minor resections of the anterior liver segments were considered the standard of practice worldwide. However, in 2023 only 5% of liver resections were conducted laparoscopically within the Ukrainian specialized centers.</div></div><div><h3>Aim</h3><div>To investigate whether the laparoscopic minor liver resections (LLR) have better financial, surgical and long-term oncological outcomes compared to open liver resections (OLR) in the two state specialized hospitals in Ukraine<strong>.</strong></div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Between January 2022 and June 2025, 205 patients with colorectal liver metastases (CLM) received either minor OLR or LLR. Primary end-points were the 30-day morbidity, surgical outcomes. Secondary endpoints were hospital costs and the oncological outcomes.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>There was a difference in postoperative morbidity between the groups in favor of the LLR – 3.8% (<em>n</em> = 4) vs 11.7% (<em>n</em> = 12) in OLR (<em>p</em> = 0.04). 1.9% (<em>n</em> = 2) in the OLR group had major complications. No mortality was registered in either group. The final sum of costs for treatment of 103 patients in LLR vs 102 patients in OLR was 3.8 M UAH vs 3.5 M UAH, respectively (<em>p</em> = 0.82). The 2-year recurrence-free survival (RFS) was 44% vs 54%, and 19.6 months vs 24.0 months respectively for OLR and LLR groups (<em>p</em> = 0.62)<strong>.</strong></div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>The laparoscopic minor liver resections in patients with colorectal cancer liver metastases in state specialized hospitals reduced the recovery period and the postoperative morbidity level with similar oncological outcomes and costs<strong>.</strong></div></div>","PeriodicalId":74892,"journal":{"name":"Surgery open science","volume":"31 ","pages":"Pages 54-59"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Surgery open science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2589845026000199","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/3/20 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

In 2017 the laparoscopic left lateral sectionectomy and minor resections of the anterior liver segments were considered the standard of practice worldwide. However, in 2023 only 5% of liver resections were conducted laparoscopically within the Ukrainian specialized centers.

Aim

To investigate whether the laparoscopic minor liver resections (LLR) have better financial, surgical and long-term oncological outcomes compared to open liver resections (OLR) in the two state specialized hospitals in Ukraine.

Methods

Between January 2022 and June 2025, 205 patients with colorectal liver metastases (CLM) received either minor OLR or LLR. Primary end-points were the 30-day morbidity, surgical outcomes. Secondary endpoints were hospital costs and the oncological outcomes.

Results

There was a difference in postoperative morbidity between the groups in favor of the LLR – 3.8% (n = 4) vs 11.7% (n = 12) in OLR (p = 0.04). 1.9% (n = 2) in the OLR group had major complications. No mortality was registered in either group. The final sum of costs for treatment of 103 patients in LLR vs 102 patients in OLR was 3.8 M UAH vs 3.5 M UAH, respectively (p = 0.82). The 2-year recurrence-free survival (RFS) was 44% vs 54%, and 19.6 months vs 24.0 months respectively for OLR and LLR groups (p = 0.62).

Conclusions

The laparoscopic minor liver resections in patients with colorectal cancer liver metastases in state specialized hospitals reduced the recovery period and the postoperative morbidity level with similar oncological outcomes and costs.
战争状态下结直肠癌肝转移的腹腔镜与开放式小肝切除术:一项前瞻性队列研究
2017年,腹腔镜左外侧切除术和肝前段小切除被认为是世界范围内的标准做法。然而,在2023年,只有5%的肝脏切除术是在乌克兰专业中心进行的腹腔镜手术。目的探讨乌克兰两家国立专科医院腹腔镜小肝切除术(LLR)与开放式肝切除术(OLR)相比,是否具有更好的经济、手术和长期肿瘤预后。方法在2022年1月至2025年6月期间,205例结直肠肝转移(CLM)患者接受了轻微的OLR或LLR。主要终点是30天的发病率,手术结果。次要终点是医院费用和肿瘤预后。结果LLR组与OLR组术后发病率差异有统计学意义,前者为3.8% (n = 4),后者为11.7% (n = 12) (p = 0.04)。OLR组有1.9% (n = 2)出现严重并发症。两组均无死亡记录。103例LLR患者和102例OLR患者的最终治疗费用总额分别为3.8 M UAH和3.5 M UAH (p = 0.82)。OLR组和LLR组2年无复发生存期(RFS)分别为44%和54%,19.6个月和24.0个月(p = 0.62)。结论国立专科医院腹腔镜结直肠癌肝转移患者行小肝切除术,恢复期短,术后发病率低,肿瘤预后相近,费用低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
66 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书