Jennifer F Beatty-Wright, Jonathan E Doriscar, Patrick L Hill, Seanna Leath
{"title":"The process of racial bias awareness in White Americans: Qualitative themes of bias, justifications, and emotions across the lifespan.","authors":"Jennifer F Beatty-Wright, Jonathan E Doriscar, Patrick L Hill, Seanna Leath","doi":"10.1037/ort0000922","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In this study, we use a mixed methods approach to analyze how age-diverse White Americans (<i>N</i> = 344) make meaning of specific instances of personal racial bias. We used a postpositivist research paradigm (Ponterotto, 2010; Ryan, 2006) to better understand how White adults assigned meaning to their past experiences of perpetuating racial bias. By integrating and expanding models of emotions (Ekman, 1992; Ford et al., 2022; Grzanka et al., 2020; Stephan & Stephan, 1985) and bias justifications (Condor et al., 2006; Crandall & Eshleman, 2003; Ford et al., 2022), we examined how White adults reflected on their bias by spontaneously using bias justifications and emotions. Regarding themes of bias, 87% of participants displayed beliefs that a person's racial group provides information about how dangerous or criminal they are. Age-diverse adults offered a range of bias justifications, including attributing their bias to various intergroup processes, like intergroup anxiety. In addition, participants most frequently indicated forms of sadness (including self-conscious emotions such as shame) about their bias. These types of justifications and emotions interrupt motivations to seek out interracial contexts or regulate their bias in the future. Specific types of bias, emotions, and justifications only differed moderately by age. Qualitative analysis demonstrated that most individuals' bias recognition was disconnected from a critical examination of how their racial bias justifications and emotions may help them maintain bias. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2026 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":55531,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Orthopsychiatry","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Orthopsychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/ort0000922","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SOCIAL WORK","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
In this study, we use a mixed methods approach to analyze how age-diverse White Americans (N = 344) make meaning of specific instances of personal racial bias. We used a postpositivist research paradigm (Ponterotto, 2010; Ryan, 2006) to better understand how White adults assigned meaning to their past experiences of perpetuating racial bias. By integrating and expanding models of emotions (Ekman, 1992; Ford et al., 2022; Grzanka et al., 2020; Stephan & Stephan, 1985) and bias justifications (Condor et al., 2006; Crandall & Eshleman, 2003; Ford et al., 2022), we examined how White adults reflected on their bias by spontaneously using bias justifications and emotions. Regarding themes of bias, 87% of participants displayed beliefs that a person's racial group provides information about how dangerous or criminal they are. Age-diverse adults offered a range of bias justifications, including attributing their bias to various intergroup processes, like intergroup anxiety. In addition, participants most frequently indicated forms of sadness (including self-conscious emotions such as shame) about their bias. These types of justifications and emotions interrupt motivations to seek out interracial contexts or regulate their bias in the future. Specific types of bias, emotions, and justifications only differed moderately by age. Qualitative analysis demonstrated that most individuals' bias recognition was disconnected from a critical examination of how their racial bias justifications and emotions may help them maintain bias. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2026 APA, all rights reserved).
在这项研究中,我们使用混合方法来分析年龄不同的美国白人(N = 344)如何理解个人种族偏见的具体实例。我们使用后实证主义研究范式(Ponterotto, 2010; Ryan, 2006)来更好地理解白人成年人如何赋予他们过去持续存在的种族偏见的意义。通过整合和扩展情绪模型(Ekman, 1992; Ford et al., 2022; Grzanka et al., 2020; Stephan & Stephan, 1985)和偏见辩护模型(Condor et al., 2006; Crandall & Eshleman, 2003; Ford et al., 2022),我们研究了白人成年人如何自发地使用偏见辩护和情绪来反思他们的偏见。关于偏见的主题,87%的参与者认为一个人的种族群体提供了他们有多危险或犯罪的信息。年龄不同的成年人提供了一系列偏见的理由,包括将他们的偏见归因于不同的群体间过程,比如群体间焦虑。此外,参与者最常表示对自己的偏见感到悲伤(包括羞耻等自我意识的情绪)。这些类型的理由和情绪打断了寻求跨种族背景或在未来调节其偏见的动机。特定类型的偏见、情绪和理由只是在年龄上略有不同。定性分析表明,大多数人的偏见认知与他们的种族偏见辩护和情绪如何帮助他们维持偏见的批判性检查脱节。(PsycInfo数据库记录(c) 2026 APA,版权所有)。
期刊介绍:
The American Journal of Orthopsychiatry publishes articles that clarify, challenge, or reshape the prevailing understanding of factors in the prevention and correction of injustice and in the sustainable development of a humane and just society.