Evaluation of Patient Experience in a Private Hospital in Costa Rica-A Retrospective Study.

IF 1.8 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Journal of Patient Experience Pub Date : 2026-03-31 eCollection Date: 2026-01-01 DOI:10.1177/23743735261438031
Georgia Hanley-Vargas, Adriana Anchía-Alfaro, Diego Quesada-Loría, Sebastián Arguedas-Chacón, Abigail Fallas-Mora, Sergio Restrepo-Arango, Esteban Zavaleta-Monestel
{"title":"Evaluation of Patient Experience in a Private Hospital in Costa Rica-A Retrospective Study.","authors":"Georgia Hanley-Vargas, Adriana Anchía-Alfaro, Diego Quesada-Loría, Sebastián Arguedas-Chacón, Abigail Fallas-Mora, Sergio Restrepo-Arango, Esteban Zavaleta-Monestel","doi":"10.1177/23743735261438031","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study evaluated patient experience in a private hospital in Costa Rica using the Picker Patient Experience Questionnaire-33 (PPE-33). A digital survey administered via Qualtrics<sup>®</sup> targeted patients treated in emergency, surgical, or inpatient units between November 2024 and February 2025. A total of 567 valid responses were analyzed, exceeding the required sample size. The mean PPE-33 score indicated a satisfaction rate of 67.6%. The lowest-rated dimension was Patient Rights (27.9%), with few patients reporting being informed about their rights. In comparison, higher scores were observed for patient information (90.4%) and for confidentiality, privacy, pain management, and care (82.0%). Statistically significant differences were observed only by occupational status (<i>p = </i>.0122), with no variation by sex, age, educational level, or marital status. The emergency department consistently showed the lowest ratings across several dimensions. Overall, the findings highlight strengths and persistent gaps in patient-centered care and support the use of digital surveys as a feasible tool for monitoring patient experience and guiding quality improvement efforts in similar private hospital settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":45073,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Patient Experience","volume":"13 ","pages":"23743735261438031"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13039608/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Patient Experience","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/23743735261438031","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study evaluated patient experience in a private hospital in Costa Rica using the Picker Patient Experience Questionnaire-33 (PPE-33). A digital survey administered via Qualtrics® targeted patients treated in emergency, surgical, or inpatient units between November 2024 and February 2025. A total of 567 valid responses were analyzed, exceeding the required sample size. The mean PPE-33 score indicated a satisfaction rate of 67.6%. The lowest-rated dimension was Patient Rights (27.9%), with few patients reporting being informed about their rights. In comparison, higher scores were observed for patient information (90.4%) and for confidentiality, privacy, pain management, and care (82.0%). Statistically significant differences were observed only by occupational status (p = .0122), with no variation by sex, age, educational level, or marital status. The emergency department consistently showed the lowest ratings across several dimensions. Overall, the findings highlight strengths and persistent gaps in patient-centered care and support the use of digital surveys as a feasible tool for monitoring patient experience and guiding quality improvement efforts in similar private hospital settings.

哥斯达黎加一家私立医院患者体验评价——回顾性研究
本研究使用Picker患者体验问卷-33 (PPE-33)评估哥斯达黎加一家私立医院的患者体验。通过Qualtrics®进行的一项数字调查针对2024年11月至2025年2月期间在急诊、外科或住院病房接受治疗的患者。总共分析了567份有效回复,超出了所需的样本量。PPE-33平均评分满意率为67.6%。评分最低的维度是患者权利(27.9%),很少有患者报告被告知他们的权利。相比之下,患者信息(90.4%)和保密、隐私、疼痛管理和护理(82.0%)得分较高。仅职业状况差异有统计学意义(p =。0122),没有性别、年龄、教育水平或婚姻状况的差异。急诊科在几个方面的评分一直最低。总体而言,研究结果突出了以患者为中心的护理的优势和持续存在的差距,并支持将数字调查作为一种可行的工具,用于监测患者体验,并指导类似私立医院环境中的质量改进工作。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Patient Experience
Journal of Patient Experience HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
6.70%
发文量
178
审稿时长
15 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书