Andrea Salins, Courtney Hooton-Robinson, Jessie Ricketts
{"title":"Does Orthography Mitigate the Impact of Background Noise on Word Learning?","authors":"Andrea Salins, Courtney Hooton-Robinson, Jessie Ricketts","doi":"10.1177/17470218261442538","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Word learning usually takes place when there is background noise in the environment and these noise levels can hamper word learning. There is substantial evidence to suggest that orthography promotes word learning. This study tests the hypothesis that orthography could mitigate the impact of noise on word learning by reducing the cognitive load and providing stable scaffolding for phonology. Word learning occurred in a self-directed online learning paradigm which reflects the increasingly common learning context for university students. Participants were 125 native English-speaking university students (mean age = 28.21, <i>SD</i> = 4.41; 65 female). They were taught 16 novel words online across three training blocks that included repetition and picture naming. Orthography was manipulated between participants (present vs. absent), and background noise was manipulated within participants (quiet vs. noise). Learning was assessed through picture naming and spelling tasks before and after training. Noise impacted learning of word meanings, but not word forms (phonology and spelling) while orthography facilitated the learning of word forms but not word meanings. Further, there was greater orthographic facilitation for word phonology retrieval for words learned in noise suggesting that orthography may reduce the negative effects of noise on some aspects of word learning. This study demonstrated orthographic facilitation of word learning in a self-directed online learning paradigm with implications for naturalistic learning. Further, it suggested the need for further examination of orthography as a tool to reduce the negative impact of noise on word learning.</p>","PeriodicalId":20869,"journal":{"name":"Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology","volume":" ","pages":"2259-2267"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13498738/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/17470218261442538","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/4/3 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PHYSIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Word learning usually takes place when there is background noise in the environment and these noise levels can hamper word learning. There is substantial evidence to suggest that orthography promotes word learning. This study tests the hypothesis that orthography could mitigate the impact of noise on word learning by reducing the cognitive load and providing stable scaffolding for phonology. Word learning occurred in a self-directed online learning paradigm which reflects the increasingly common learning context for university students. Participants were 125 native English-speaking university students (mean age = 28.21, SD = 4.41; 65 female). They were taught 16 novel words online across three training blocks that included repetition and picture naming. Orthography was manipulated between participants (present vs. absent), and background noise was manipulated within participants (quiet vs. noise). Learning was assessed through picture naming and spelling tasks before and after training. Noise impacted learning of word meanings, but not word forms (phonology and spelling) while orthography facilitated the learning of word forms but not word meanings. Further, there was greater orthographic facilitation for word phonology retrieval for words learned in noise suggesting that orthography may reduce the negative effects of noise on some aspects of word learning. This study demonstrated orthographic facilitation of word learning in a self-directed online learning paradigm with implications for naturalistic learning. Further, it suggested the need for further examination of orthography as a tool to reduce the negative impact of noise on word learning.
期刊介绍:
Promoting the interests of scientific psychology and its researchers, QJEP, the journal of the Experimental Psychology Society, is a leading journal with a long-standing tradition of publishing cutting-edge research. Several articles have become classic papers in the fields of attention, perception, learning, memory, language, and reasoning. The journal publishes original articles on any topic within the field of experimental psychology (including comparative research). These include substantial experimental reports, review papers, rapid communications (reporting novel techniques or ground breaking results), comments (on articles previously published in QJEP or on issues of general interest to experimental psychologists), and book reviews. Experimental results are welcomed from all relevant techniques, including behavioural testing, brain imaging and computational modelling.
QJEP offers a competitive publication time-scale. Accepted Rapid Communications have priority in the publication cycle and usually appear in print within three months. We aim to publish all accepted (but uncorrected) articles online within seven days. Our Latest Articles page offers immediate publication of articles upon reaching their final form.
The journal offers an open access option called Open Select, enabling authors to meet funder requirements to make their article free to read online for all in perpetuity. Authors also benefit from a broad and diverse subscription base that delivers the journal contents to a world-wide readership. Together these features ensure that the journal offers authors the opportunity to raise the visibility of their work to a global audience.