Does Orthography Mitigate the Impact of Background Noise on Word Learning?

IF 1.8 3区 心理学 Q4 PHYSIOLOGY
Andrea Salins, Courtney Hooton-Robinson, Jessie Ricketts
{"title":"Does Orthography Mitigate the Impact of Background Noise on Word Learning?","authors":"Andrea Salins, Courtney Hooton-Robinson, Jessie Ricketts","doi":"10.1177/17470218261442538","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Word learning usually takes place when there is background noise in the environment and these noise levels can hamper word learning. There is substantial evidence to suggest that orthography promotes word learning. This study tests the hypothesis that orthography could mitigate the impact of noise on word learning by reducing the cognitive load and providing stable scaffolding for phonology. Word learning occurred in a self-directed online learning paradigm which reflects the increasingly common learning context for university students. Participants were 125 native English-speaking university students (mean age = 28.21, <i>SD</i> = 4.41; 65 female). They were taught 16 novel words online across three training blocks that included repetition and picture naming. Orthography was manipulated between participants (present vs. absent), and background noise was manipulated within participants (quiet vs. noise). Learning was assessed through picture naming and spelling tasks before and after training. Noise impacted learning of word meanings, but not word forms (phonology and spelling) while orthography facilitated the learning of word forms but not word meanings. Further, there was greater orthographic facilitation for word phonology retrieval for words learned in noise suggesting that orthography may reduce the negative effects of noise on some aspects of word learning. This study demonstrated orthographic facilitation of word learning in a self-directed online learning paradigm with implications for naturalistic learning. Further, it suggested the need for further examination of orthography as a tool to reduce the negative impact of noise on word learning.</p>","PeriodicalId":20869,"journal":{"name":"Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology","volume":" ","pages":"2259-2267"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13498738/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/17470218261442538","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/4/3 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PHYSIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Word learning usually takes place when there is background noise in the environment and these noise levels can hamper word learning. There is substantial evidence to suggest that orthography promotes word learning. This study tests the hypothesis that orthography could mitigate the impact of noise on word learning by reducing the cognitive load and providing stable scaffolding for phonology. Word learning occurred in a self-directed online learning paradigm which reflects the increasingly common learning context for university students. Participants were 125 native English-speaking university students (mean age = 28.21, SD = 4.41; 65 female). They were taught 16 novel words online across three training blocks that included repetition and picture naming. Orthography was manipulated between participants (present vs. absent), and background noise was manipulated within participants (quiet vs. noise). Learning was assessed through picture naming and spelling tasks before and after training. Noise impacted learning of word meanings, but not word forms (phonology and spelling) while orthography facilitated the learning of word forms but not word meanings. Further, there was greater orthographic facilitation for word phonology retrieval for words learned in noise suggesting that orthography may reduce the negative effects of noise on some aspects of word learning. This study demonstrated orthographic facilitation of word learning in a self-directed online learning paradigm with implications for naturalistic learning. Further, it suggested the need for further examination of orthography as a tool to reduce the negative impact of noise on word learning.

《快报》:正字法是否能减轻背景噪音对单词学习的影响?
单词学习通常发生在有背景噪音的环境中,这些噪音水平会阻碍单词学习。有大量证据表明,正字法促进单词学习。本研究验证了正字法可以通过减少认知负荷和为语音学习提供稳定的支架来减轻噪声对单词学习的影响。研究对象为125名以英语为母语的大学生(男性= 28.21,SD = 4.41;女性65名)。他们在网上学习了16个新颖的单词,分为三个训练模块,包括重复和图片命名。在参与者之间(在场和缺席)对正字法进行处理,在参与者内部对背景噪音进行处理(安静和噪音)。在训练期间和训练后,通过图片命名和拼写任务来评估学习情况。噪音影响了词义的学习,但对词形(音系和拼写)没有影响,而正字法促进了词形的学习,但对词义没有影响。此外,在噪音环境下学习的单词,正字法对单词音韵检索有更大的促进作用,这表明正字法可能会减少噪音对单词学习某些方面的负面影响。本研究证明了在自我导向的在线学习范式中,单词学习的正字法促进作用与自然主义学习的启示。此外,它建议需要进一步检查正字法作为一种工具,以减少噪音对单词学习的负面影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
5.90%
发文量
178
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Promoting the interests of scientific psychology and its researchers, QJEP, the journal of the Experimental Psychology Society, is a leading journal with a long-standing tradition of publishing cutting-edge research. Several articles have become classic papers in the fields of attention, perception, learning, memory, language, and reasoning. The journal publishes original articles on any topic within the field of experimental psychology (including comparative research). These include substantial experimental reports, review papers, rapid communications (reporting novel techniques or ground breaking results), comments (on articles previously published in QJEP or on issues of general interest to experimental psychologists), and book reviews. Experimental results are welcomed from all relevant techniques, including behavioural testing, brain imaging and computational modelling. QJEP offers a competitive publication time-scale. Accepted Rapid Communications have priority in the publication cycle and usually appear in print within three months. We aim to publish all accepted (but uncorrected) articles online within seven days. Our Latest Articles page offers immediate publication of articles upon reaching their final form. The journal offers an open access option called Open Select, enabling authors to meet funder requirements to make their article free to read online for all in perpetuity. Authors also benefit from a broad and diverse subscription base that delivers the journal contents to a world-wide readership. Together these features ensure that the journal offers authors the opportunity to raise the visibility of their work to a global audience.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书