{"title":"A Framework for MRI Characterization of Intracranial Metastatic Disease.","authors":"Arian Lasocki, Stefanie Catherine Thust, Grant A McArthur","doi":"10.1148/rycan.250627","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Intracranial metastases (IM) are far more common than primary malignant brain tumors, yet remain understudied, representing an important unmet clinical need. Although patients with IM have historically been excluded from clinical trials, thus limiting assessment of intracranial treatment efficacy, their inclusion is increasing; however, patients with suspected leptomeningeal metastatic disease (LMD) remain commonly excluded, likely due to poorer prognosis and anticipated limited treatment response. Despite established treatment response criteria for confirmed LMD, there is limited guidance on how LMD should be diagnosed or excluded in broader IM trials, creating substantial risk for variability and misclassification. This article addresses the gap by proposing MRI-based criteria for classifying IM appearances with respect to LMD suspicion, focusing on the exclusion of LMD, illustrated with real patient examples. IM-related MRI findings are categorized into three groups: <i>(a)</i> imaging consistent with LMD, not requiring cerebrospinal spinal fluid confirmation; <i>(b)</i> equivocal findings warranting further evaluation with cerebrospinal fluid analysis or spinal MRI; and <i>(c</i>) imaging with low suspicion for LMD. Common pitfalls, mimics, and recommended next steps for equivocal findings are discussed. <b>Keywords:</b> Intracranial Metastasis, Leptomeningeal Metastatic Disease, MRI © RSNA, 2026.</p>","PeriodicalId":20786,"journal":{"name":"Radiology. Imaging cancer","volume":"8 3","pages":"e250627"},"PeriodicalIF":7.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13231196/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Radiology. Imaging cancer","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1148/rycan.250627","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Intracranial metastases (IM) are far more common than primary malignant brain tumors, yet remain understudied, representing an important unmet clinical need. Although patients with IM have historically been excluded from clinical trials, thus limiting assessment of intracranial treatment efficacy, their inclusion is increasing; however, patients with suspected leptomeningeal metastatic disease (LMD) remain commonly excluded, likely due to poorer prognosis and anticipated limited treatment response. Despite established treatment response criteria for confirmed LMD, there is limited guidance on how LMD should be diagnosed or excluded in broader IM trials, creating substantial risk for variability and misclassification. This article addresses the gap by proposing MRI-based criteria for classifying IM appearances with respect to LMD suspicion, focusing on the exclusion of LMD, illustrated with real patient examples. IM-related MRI findings are categorized into three groups: (a) imaging consistent with LMD, not requiring cerebrospinal spinal fluid confirmation; (b) equivocal findings warranting further evaluation with cerebrospinal fluid analysis or spinal MRI; and (c) imaging with low suspicion for LMD. Common pitfalls, mimics, and recommended next steps for equivocal findings are discussed. Keywords: Intracranial Metastasis, Leptomeningeal Metastatic Disease, MRI © RSNA, 2026.
颅内转移性疾病的MRI表征框架。
颅内转移瘤(IM)远比原发性恶性脑肿瘤更常见,但仍未得到充分的研究,代表了一个重要的未满足的临床需求。虽然IM患者历来被排除在临床试验之外,从而限制了颅内治疗疗效的评估,但他们的纳入正在增加;然而,疑似轻脑膜转移性疾病(LMD)的患者通常被排除在外,可能是由于预后较差和预期的治疗反应有限。尽管已经建立了确诊LMD的治疗反应标准,但在更广泛的IM试验中,关于如何诊断或排除LMD的指导有限,这造成了变异性和错误分类的巨大风险。本文通过提出基于mri的关于LMD怀疑的IM外观分类标准来解决这一差距,重点是LMD的排除,并以真实患者的例子进行说明。与im相关的MRI检查结果分为三组:(a)与LMD一致的成像,不需要脑脊液确认;(b)模棱两可的发现,需要进行脑脊液分析或脊柱MRI进一步评估;(c) LMD低怀疑影像。讨论了常见的陷阱、模拟和建议的模棱两可结果的下一步步骤。关键词:颅内转移,轻脑膜转移性疾病,MRI©RSNA, 2026。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。