{"title":"Psychometric properties of the performance fatigue index in people with stroke.","authors":"Lily Y W Ho, Claudia K Y Lai, Shamay S M Ng","doi":"10.1080/10749357.2026.2648213","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The performance fatigue index provides objective measures for assessing the impact of fatigue on performance and it may be utilized for monitoring functional outcomes in individuals with stroke; however, its psychometric properties have been minimally studied in this population.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To examine the test-retest reliability and agreement; known-group validity of the performance fatigue index; and its correlations with self-perceived fatigue, depressive symptoms, sleep quality, and reintegration to normal living in people with stroke.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Participants with and without stroke completed a 6-minute walk test for calculating the performance fatigue index. Participants with stroke also completed the Fatigue Assessment Scale, the Geriatric Depression Scale, the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index, and the Reintegration to Normal Living Index. The intra-class correlation coefficient, standard error of measurement, minimal detectable change, and known group validity of the performance fatigue index were determined. Spearman's correlation was used to examine the relationships between the index and other variables.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The intra-class correlation coefficient of the performance fatigue index was 0.99, the standard error of measurement was 0.53 and the minimal detectable change was 1.46. The performance fatigue index could be used to differentiate individuals with stroke from those without stroke. It significantly correlated with self-perceived physical fatigue subscore (r<sub>s</sub> = 0.29, <i>p</i> = .034) and reintegration to normal living (r<sub>s</sub> = -0.34, <i>p</i> = .012) but not correlated with self-perceived mental fatigue subscore, depressive symptoms, or sleep quality.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The performance fatigue index is reliable and valid in assessing and monitoring post-stroke physical fatigue in clinical and research settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":23164,"journal":{"name":"Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation","volume":" ","pages":"779-788"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10749357.2026.2648213","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/4/3 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: The performance fatigue index provides objective measures for assessing the impact of fatigue on performance and it may be utilized for monitoring functional outcomes in individuals with stroke; however, its psychometric properties have been minimally studied in this population.
Objectives: To examine the test-retest reliability and agreement; known-group validity of the performance fatigue index; and its correlations with self-perceived fatigue, depressive symptoms, sleep quality, and reintegration to normal living in people with stroke.
Methods: Participants with and without stroke completed a 6-minute walk test for calculating the performance fatigue index. Participants with stroke also completed the Fatigue Assessment Scale, the Geriatric Depression Scale, the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index, and the Reintegration to Normal Living Index. The intra-class correlation coefficient, standard error of measurement, minimal detectable change, and known group validity of the performance fatigue index were determined. Spearman's correlation was used to examine the relationships between the index and other variables.
Results: The intra-class correlation coefficient of the performance fatigue index was 0.99, the standard error of measurement was 0.53 and the minimal detectable change was 1.46. The performance fatigue index could be used to differentiate individuals with stroke from those without stroke. It significantly correlated with self-perceived physical fatigue subscore (rs = 0.29, p = .034) and reintegration to normal living (rs = -0.34, p = .012) but not correlated with self-perceived mental fatigue subscore, depressive symptoms, or sleep quality.
Conclusion: The performance fatigue index is reliable and valid in assessing and monitoring post-stroke physical fatigue in clinical and research settings.
背景:体能疲劳指数为评估疲劳对体能的影响提供了客观的衡量标准,并可用于监测脑卒中患者的功能结局;然而,在这一人群中,其心理测量特性的研究很少。目的:检验重测信度和一致性;绩效疲劳指标的已知组效度;它与中风患者自我感觉疲劳、抑郁症状、睡眠质量以及重新融入正常生活的相关性。方法:有和没有中风的参与者完成了6分钟的步行测试,以计算疲劳指数。卒中患者还完成了疲劳评估量表、老年抑郁量表、匹兹堡睡眠质量指数和重返正常生活指数。确定了性能疲劳指数的类内相关系数、测量标准误差、最小可检测变化和已知组效度。斯皮尔曼相关性被用来检验指数和其他变量之间的关系。结果:性能疲劳指数的类内相关系数为0.99,测量标准误差为0.53,最小可检测变化为1.46。性能疲劳指数可用于区分脑卒中患者和非脑卒中患者。与自我知觉体力疲劳分值显著相关(rs = 0.29, p =。034)和重新融入正常生活(rs = -0.34, p =。012),但与自我感知的精神疲劳亚评分、抑郁症状或睡眠质量无关。结论:性能疲劳指数在临床和研究中评估和监测脑卒中后身体疲劳是可靠和有效的。
期刊介绍:
Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation is the leading journal devoted to the study and dissemination of interdisciplinary, evidence-based, clinical information related to stroke rehabilitation. The journal’s scope covers physical medicine and rehabilitation, neurology, neurorehabilitation, neural engineering and therapeutics, neuropsychology and cognition, optimization of the rehabilitation system, robotics and biomechanics, pain management, nursing, physical therapy, cardiopulmonary fitness, mobility, occupational therapy, speech pathology and communication. There is a particular focus on stroke recovery, improving rehabilitation outcomes, quality of life, activities of daily living, motor control, family and care givers, and community issues.
The journal reviews and reports clinical practices, clinical trials, state-of-the-art concepts, and new developments in stroke research and patient care. Both primary research papers, reviews of existing literature, and invited editorials, are included. Sharply-focused, single-issue topics, and the latest in clinical research, provide in-depth knowledge.