[Prognostic modeling of long-term outcomes after minimally invasive lumbar fusion based on complex clinical, radiological and neuroimaging analysis in employees of JSC «Russian Railways»].

Q4 Medicine
V A Byvaltsev, A A Kalinin, Yu Ya Pestryakov, E E Satardinova, S I Noskov
{"title":"[Prognostic modeling of long-term outcomes after minimally invasive lumbar fusion based on complex clinical, radiological and neuroimaging analysis in employees of JSC «Russian Railways»].","authors":"V A Byvaltsev, A A Kalinin, Yu Ya Pestryakov, E E Satardinova, S I Noskov","doi":"10.17116/neiro20269002144","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The incidence of unsatisfactory postoperative outcomes after treatment of degenerative lumbosacral spine diseases depends on surgical method. Their prediction is difficult due to heterogeneity of clinical and instrumental characteristics of patient groups. Development of predictive models of clinical outcomes may be useful for decision making and favorable postoperative outcomes.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To develop and validate the effectiveness of multivariate predictive model for assessing the risks and benefits of minimally invasive lumbar fusion in railway workers with degenerative lumbar spine diseases.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>We retrospectively analyzed prospective database consisting of 457 patients. They underwent minimally invasive lumbar fusion between 2020 and 2023. Comprehensive clinical, radiological and neuroimaging assessments were performed before surgery and 24 months later. Regression analysis was used to create prognostic models of long-term clinical outcomes (y0 - ODI; y1 - SF-36 PCS (physical component score); y2 - SF-36 MCS (mental component score); y3 - Macnab scale).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All clinical parameters (ODI, VAS, SF-36) significantly improved after surgery compared to preoperative values (<i>p</i><0.01). Within 90 days after surgery, redo surgery rate was 5.7%, and the number of readmissions throughout the entire follow-up period - 8.3%. About 87.3% of railway workers returned to previous work. Clinical deterioration was observed in 51 (11.2%) patients. Preoperative variables predict long-term clinical outcomes. Their role and dominance depend on prognostic model.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Predictive models may be valuable to improve long-term outcomes when planning minimally invasive lumbar spine fusion.</p>","PeriodicalId":24032,"journal":{"name":"Zhurnal voprosy neirokhirurgii imeni N. N. Burdenko","volume":"90 2","pages":"44-53"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Zhurnal voprosy neirokhirurgii imeni N. N. Burdenko","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17116/neiro20269002144","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The incidence of unsatisfactory postoperative outcomes after treatment of degenerative lumbosacral spine diseases depends on surgical method. Their prediction is difficult due to heterogeneity of clinical and instrumental characteristics of patient groups. Development of predictive models of clinical outcomes may be useful for decision making and favorable postoperative outcomes.

Objective: To develop and validate the effectiveness of multivariate predictive model for assessing the risks and benefits of minimally invasive lumbar fusion in railway workers with degenerative lumbar spine diseases.

Material and methods: We retrospectively analyzed prospective database consisting of 457 patients. They underwent minimally invasive lumbar fusion between 2020 and 2023. Comprehensive clinical, radiological and neuroimaging assessments were performed before surgery and 24 months later. Regression analysis was used to create prognostic models of long-term clinical outcomes (y0 - ODI; y1 - SF-36 PCS (physical component score); y2 - SF-36 MCS (mental component score); y3 - Macnab scale).

Results: All clinical parameters (ODI, VAS, SF-36) significantly improved after surgery compared to preoperative values (p<0.01). Within 90 days after surgery, redo surgery rate was 5.7%, and the number of readmissions throughout the entire follow-up period - 8.3%. About 87.3% of railway workers returned to previous work. Clinical deterioration was observed in 51 (11.2%) patients. Preoperative variables predict long-term clinical outcomes. Their role and dominance depend on prognostic model.

Conclusion: Predictive models may be valuable to improve long-term outcomes when planning minimally invasive lumbar spine fusion.

[基于俄罗斯铁路公司员工复杂的临床、放射学和神经影像学分析的微创腰椎融合术后长期预后模型]。
腰骶椎退行性疾病术后不满意的发生率与手术方式有关。由于患者组的临床和仪器特征的异质性,其预测是困难的。临床预后预测模型的发展可能有助于决策和良好的术后预后。目的:建立并验证多变量预测模型对铁路职工腰椎退行性疾病行微创腰椎融合术的风险和收益评估的有效性。材料和方法:我们回顾性分析前瞻性数据库,包括457例患者。他们在2020年至2023年间接受了微创腰椎融合术。术前和术后24个月进行全面的临床、放射学和神经影像学评估。采用回归分析建立长期临床结果的预后模型(y0 - ODI、y1 - sf - 36pcs(身体成分评分)、y1 - sf - 36pcs、y1 - sf - 36pcs);y2 - SF-36 MCS(心理成分评分);y3 - Macnab量表)。结果:与术前相比,术后所有临床参数(ODI、VAS、SF-36)均有显著改善(结论:预测模型在规划微创腰椎融合时可能对改善长期预后有价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
75
期刊介绍: Scientific and practical peer-reviewed journal. This publication covers the theoretical, practical and organizational problems of modern neurosurgery, the latest advances in the treatment of various diseases of the central and peripheral nervous system. Founded in 1937. English version of the journal translates from Russian version since #1/2013.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书