Fungal keratitis treatment: Unveiling strategies and emerging trends - A systematic review.

Q3 Medicine
Oman Journal of Ophthalmology Pub Date : 2026-02-27 eCollection Date: 2026-01-01 DOI:10.4103/ojo.ojo_67_25
Gabriella Hafidha Badruddin, Stella Nathania, Lukman Edwar
{"title":"Fungal keratitis treatment: Unveiling strategies and emerging trends - A systematic review.","authors":"Gabriella Hafidha Badruddin, Stella Nathania, Lukman Edwar","doi":"10.4103/ojo.ojo_67_25","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study evaluates the efficacy of antifungal medications for fungal keratitis through a systematic review in accordance with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis guidelines. A comprehensive search of PubMed, Cochrane, and ScienceDirect was performed, including randomized controlled trials (RCT), cohort, and case-control studies on antifungal therapy for fungal keratitis. Keywords and MeSH terms, including \"keratitis,\" \"fungal keratitis,\" \"antifungal,\" and \"therapy,\" were used to identify relevant studies. The screening process was facilitated through Rayyan, an online-based platform. The inclusion criteria were English-language, full-text human studies on antifungal therapy. Data extraction included study details, interventions, outcomes, and adverse effects, with efficacy evaluated on a scale of 0-2 based on clinical outcomes. Twelve RCT involving 1.715 adult patients from India, China, and Nepal were reviewed. The mean patient age was 48.1 years, with males predominating. All studies used 5% natamycin eye drops, with seven incorporating voriconazole in various forms. Additional therapies included chlorhexidine, amphotericin B, ciprofloxacin, levofloxacin, hypochlorous acid (HOCI), and ketoconazole. Seven studies reported significant improvements in best-corrected visual acuity, infiltrate size, and treatment success. Natamycin monotherapy was shown to have the highest efficacy with a score of 11. Combination therapies, including voriconazole showed effectiveness but with slightly lower scores. In severe cases, combining natamycin with systemic antifungals such as voriconazole, ketoconazole, or amphotericin B was necessary for optimal outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":19461,"journal":{"name":"Oman Journal of Ophthalmology","volume":"19 1","pages":"37-47"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-02-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13043117/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Oman Journal of Ophthalmology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/ojo.ojo_67_25","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study evaluates the efficacy of antifungal medications for fungal keratitis through a systematic review in accordance with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis guidelines. A comprehensive search of PubMed, Cochrane, and ScienceDirect was performed, including randomized controlled trials (RCT), cohort, and case-control studies on antifungal therapy for fungal keratitis. Keywords and MeSH terms, including "keratitis," "fungal keratitis," "antifungal," and "therapy," were used to identify relevant studies. The screening process was facilitated through Rayyan, an online-based platform. The inclusion criteria were English-language, full-text human studies on antifungal therapy. Data extraction included study details, interventions, outcomes, and adverse effects, with efficacy evaluated on a scale of 0-2 based on clinical outcomes. Twelve RCT involving 1.715 adult patients from India, China, and Nepal were reviewed. The mean patient age was 48.1 years, with males predominating. All studies used 5% natamycin eye drops, with seven incorporating voriconazole in various forms. Additional therapies included chlorhexidine, amphotericin B, ciprofloxacin, levofloxacin, hypochlorous acid (HOCI), and ketoconazole. Seven studies reported significant improvements in best-corrected visual acuity, infiltrate size, and treatment success. Natamycin monotherapy was shown to have the highest efficacy with a score of 11. Combination therapies, including voriconazole showed effectiveness but with slightly lower scores. In severe cases, combining natamycin with systemic antifungals such as voriconazole, ketoconazole, or amphotericin B was necessary for optimal outcomes.

真菌性角膜炎治疗:揭示策略和新趋势-系统综述。
本研究根据系统评价和荟萃分析指南的首选报告项目,通过系统评价评估抗真菌药物治疗真菌性角膜炎的疗效。我们对PubMed、Cochrane和ScienceDirect进行了全面的检索,包括随机对照试验(RCT)、队列研究和真菌性角膜炎抗真菌治疗的病例对照研究。关键词和MeSH术语,包括“角膜炎”、“真菌性角膜炎”、“抗真菌”和“治疗”,用于识别相关研究。筛选过程是通过网络平台Rayyan进行的。纳入标准为英文、全文人类抗真菌治疗研究。数据提取包括研究细节、干预措施、结果和不良反应,并根据临床结果对疗效进行0-2级评价。回顾性分析了来自印度、中国和尼泊尔的12项涉及1715名成年患者的随机对照试验。患者平均年龄48.1岁,以男性为主。所有的研究都使用了5%的纳他霉素滴眼液,其中7项研究使用了不同形式的伏立康唑。其他治疗包括氯己定、两性霉素B、环丙沙星、左氧氟沙星、次氯酸(HOCI)和酮康唑。七项研究报告了最佳矫正视力、浸润大小和治疗成功率的显著改善。纳他霉素单药治疗的疗效最高,得分为11分。包括伏立康唑在内的联合治疗显示出有效性,但得分略低。在严重的病例中,联合纳他霉素与伏立康唑、酮康唑或两性霉素B等全身抗真菌药物是获得最佳结果所必需的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Oman Journal of Ophthalmology
Oman Journal of Ophthalmology Medicine-Ophthalmology
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
68
审稿时长
50 weeks
期刊介绍: To provide a platform for scientific expression of the Oman Ophthalmic Society and the international Ophthalmic community and to provide opportunities for free exchange of ideas and information. To serve as a valuable resource for ophthalmologists, eye-care providers including optometrists, orthoptists, other health care professionals and research workers in all aspects of the field of visual science.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书