Comparative effectiveness of bilateral versus unilateral topical anesthesia in cataract surgery with hard grades of cataract by phacoemulsification technique: A focus on surgical comfort and efficiency.

Q3 Medicine
Oman Journal of Ophthalmology Pub Date : 2026-02-27 eCollection Date: 2026-01-01 DOI:10.4103/ojo.ojo_417_24
Rajesh Subhash Joshi, Bhavesh Gurudasani, Murtaza Hussain, Nikhil Darade, Riya Rajesh Joshi
{"title":"Comparative effectiveness of bilateral versus unilateral topical anesthesia in cataract surgery with hard grades of cataract by phacoemulsification technique: A focus on surgical comfort and efficiency.","authors":"Rajesh Subhash Joshi, Bhavesh Gurudasani, Murtaza Hussain, Nikhil Darade, Riya Rajesh Joshi","doi":"10.4103/ojo.ojo_417_24","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>This study aimed to compare the effectiveness of bilateral versus unilateral topical anesthesia in cataract surgery, with emphasis on surgical comfort and efficiency.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>In this prospective, randomized controlled study, 76 patients undergoing cataract surgery with phacoemulsification were divided into two groups: Group A received unilateral topical anesthesia, and Group B received bilateral topical anesthesia. The parameters assessed were intraoperative and postoperative pain scores, surgeon comfort score, total surgical time, and the need for supplemental anesthesia. Statistical analysis was performed to compare outcomes between the two groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean intraoperative pain scores were 0.92 ± 1.25 in Group A and 0.73 ± 1.35 in Group B (<i>P</i> = 0.54). The mean postoperative pain scores were 4.784 ± 1.054 in Group A 3.321 ± 1.222 in Group B (<i>P</i> = 0.66). The average surgical time was 10.54 ± 2.33 min in Group A and 9.46 ± 3.31 min in Group B (<i>P</i> = 0.66). The surgeon's comfort score was 0.34 ± 0.31 in Group A and 0.23 ± 0.23 in Group B (<i>P</i> = 0.34). Supplemental anesthesia was required in two patients from Group A, and one from Group B.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Both bilateral and unilateral topical anesthesia provided similar levels of patient comfort, surgeon comfort, and procedural efficiency during cataract surgery. The choice between bilateral and unilateral topical anesthesia can be based on surgeon preference and specific patient needs, without significantly affecting surgical outcomes or efficiency.</p>","PeriodicalId":19461,"journal":{"name":"Oman Journal of Ophthalmology","volume":"19 1","pages":"81-85"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-02-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13043110/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Oman Journal of Ophthalmology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/ojo.ojo_417_24","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim: This study aimed to compare the effectiveness of bilateral versus unilateral topical anesthesia in cataract surgery, with emphasis on surgical comfort and efficiency.

Materials and methods: In this prospective, randomized controlled study, 76 patients undergoing cataract surgery with phacoemulsification were divided into two groups: Group A received unilateral topical anesthesia, and Group B received bilateral topical anesthesia. The parameters assessed were intraoperative and postoperative pain scores, surgeon comfort score, total surgical time, and the need for supplemental anesthesia. Statistical analysis was performed to compare outcomes between the two groups.

Results: The mean intraoperative pain scores were 0.92 ± 1.25 in Group A and 0.73 ± 1.35 in Group B (P = 0.54). The mean postoperative pain scores were 4.784 ± 1.054 in Group A 3.321 ± 1.222 in Group B (P = 0.66). The average surgical time was 10.54 ± 2.33 min in Group A and 9.46 ± 3.31 min in Group B (P = 0.66). The surgeon's comfort score was 0.34 ± 0.31 in Group A and 0.23 ± 0.23 in Group B (P = 0.34). Supplemental anesthesia was required in two patients from Group A, and one from Group B.

Conclusions: Both bilateral and unilateral topical anesthesia provided similar levels of patient comfort, surgeon comfort, and procedural efficiency during cataract surgery. The choice between bilateral and unilateral topical anesthesia can be based on surgeon preference and specific patient needs, without significantly affecting surgical outcomes or efficiency.

双侧和单侧表面麻醉在硬级白内障超声乳化手术中的比较效果:手术舒适度和手术效率的重点。
目的:本研究旨在比较双侧和单侧表面麻醉在白内障手术中的效果,重点是手术的舒适性和效率。材料与方法:本前瞻性、随机对照研究将76例行白内障超声乳化手术的患者分为两组:A组单侧表面麻醉,B组双侧表面麻醉。评估的参数包括术中和术后疼痛评分、外科医生舒适度评分、总手术时间以及是否需要补充麻醉。对两组结果进行统计学分析比较。结果:A组平均术中疼痛评分为0.92±1.25,B组平均疼痛评分为0.73±1.35 (P = 0.54)。术后平均疼痛评分A组为4.784±1.054,B组为3.321±1.222 (P = 0.66)。A组平均手术时间为10.54±2.33 min, B组平均手术时间为9.46±3.31 min (P = 0.66)。A组患者舒适度评分为0.34±0.31,B组患者舒适度评分为0.23±0.23 (P = 0.34)。A组2例患者需要补充麻醉,b组1例患者需要补充麻醉。结论:双侧和单侧表面麻醉在白内障手术中提供相似水平的患者舒适度、外科医生舒适度和手术效率。双侧和单侧表面麻醉的选择可以根据外科医生的偏好和患者的具体需要,而不会显著影响手术结果或效率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Oman Journal of Ophthalmology
Oman Journal of Ophthalmology Medicine-Ophthalmology
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
68
审稿时长
50 weeks
期刊介绍: To provide a platform for scientific expression of the Oman Ophthalmic Society and the international Ophthalmic community and to provide opportunities for free exchange of ideas and information. To serve as a valuable resource for ophthalmologists, eye-care providers including optometrists, orthoptists, other health care professionals and research workers in all aspects of the field of visual science.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书